Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan MK NO: 18/ PUU-XVII/ 2019 dan PUTUSAN MK NO: 2/ PUU-XIX/2021
Abstract
This research aims to provide an overview of the execution of the fiduciary security object following the read of the two Constitutional Court Decisions which altered the understanding of the legal norms for the execution of the fiduciary security. The research method used is a normative juridical research method. The novelty of this article is related to the new legal norms in the execution of fiduciary guarantees related to the implementation of executive titles on fiduciary guarantee certificates and parate executive as well as the researcher's views which contradict the legal considerations and legal orders of the Constitutional Court in both decisions. Subsequent to the enactment of the two Constitutional Court Decisions, the creditor as the fiduciary recipient cannot immediately perform the execution of the object of the fiduciary security belonging to the debtor as the fiduciary recipient in the event that the debtor does not agree to the breach of contract and the debtor refuses to submit the object of the fiduciary guarantee voluntarily to the creditor. In addition, the legal norms contained in the two decisions of the Constitutional Court are a form of affirmation of the legal norms that should be carried out by creditors in carrying out the executorial title in a fiduciary guarantee certificate, namely by submitting an application for the execution of the object of guarantee to the Head of the local District Court.
Downloads
References
Akhsin, Muhammad Hilmi dan Anis Mashdurohatun, 'Akibat Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Menurut UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999', Jurnal Akta, 4.3 (2017) < http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i3.1825>.
Alizon, Joni, ‘Rekonstruksi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/ PUU-XVII/2019', Eksekusi, 2.1 (2020), < http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/je.v2i1.9741>.
Bouzen, Robert dan dan Ashibly, 'Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitur Yang Wanprestasi Setelah Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019', Gagasan Hukum, 3.2 (2021) < https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/gh/article/view/8907>.
Budi, Antonius, ‘Hapusnya Lembaga Parate Eksekusi Sebagai Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51.2 (2021), < http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.3053>.
Dewi, Retno Puspo, ‘Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia’, Jurnal Repertorium Volume, 4.1 (2017) <https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/213284-kekuatan-eksekutorial-sertifikat-jaminan.pdf>.
Dinata, Ari Wirya, ‘Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia: Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, Nagari Law Review, 3.2 (2020), <https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.3.i.2.p.84-99.2020>.
Harahap, M. Yahya, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian, II (Bandung: Alumni, 1986).
Jati, Imam Wahyu, ‘Eksistensi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia’, ’AAINUL HAQ: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1.1 (2021), < https://ejournal.an-nadwah.ac.id/index.php/ainulhaq/article/view/233>.
Kosasih, Johannes Ibrahim, Anak Agung Istri Agung, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, 'Parate Eksekusi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) No. 18/ PUU-XVII/ 2019 dan No: 02/ PUU-XIX/ 2021 Terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Atas Lembaga Pembiayaan Leasing', Jurnal Ius Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 10.1 (2022) < http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v0i0.971>.
Lestari, Kadek Cinthya Dwi Lestari, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti, ‘Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan’, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2.3 (2020) <https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2502.383-387>.
Manurung, Martin Anggiat Maranata dan Jawade Hafidz, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Apabila Objek Jaminan Fidusia Ternyata Hilang Dan Debitor Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus Di PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Dinamika Bangun Arta Salatiga)’, Jurnal Akta, 4.1 (2017) <https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i1.1557>.
N, Debora R. N., 'Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Terhadap Parate Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia', Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 3.3 (2015)
Prasetyo, Eko Surya, ‘Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, Refleksi Hukum, 5.1 (2020) <http://ejournal.uksw.edu/refleksihukum>.
Pratama, Angga and Endang Pandamdari, ‘Analisis Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Hak Eksekutorial Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Dimiliki Kreditur Pada Pasal 15 Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3.1 (2020) < http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v3i1.8920>.
Riskawati, Shanti Riskawati, ‘Rasio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/ PUU-XVII/ 2019 dan Perubahan Konstruksi Norma Eksekusi dan Wanprestasi Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia', ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 5.1 (2021), < https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i1.613>.
Saradila, Finka, ‘Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Penjualan Dibawah Tangan Sebagai Penyelesaian Kredit Macet’, Jatiswara, 32.3 (2017) <http://jatiswara.unram.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/130>.
Sepalia, Weni, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Yang Berbasis Asas Proporsional Terhadap Debitur dan Kreditur Dalam Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia', Jurnal Lex Lata, 2.3 (2020), < http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/LexS/article/view/821>.
Sinaga, Niru Anita dan Nurlely Darwis, 'Wanprestasi dan Akibat Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian', Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 7.2 (2015), < https://journal.universitassuryadarma.ac.id/index.php/jmm/article/view/534>.
Sonata, Depri Liber, 'Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum', Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283>.
Sukma, Indah, Sirajuddin, Solehoddin, 'Efekktivitas Putusan Majelis Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Putusan Pengadilan Negeri', The 4th Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Technology (CIASTECH 2021), (2021), < https://publishing-widyagama.ac.id/ejournal-v2/index.php/ciastech/article/view/3307>.
Supianto dan Nanang Tri Budiman, ‘Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Sebagai Pemenuhan Asas Publisitas’, Ijlil, 1.3 (2021) <https://doi.org/10.35719/ijl.v1i3.84>.
Suryoutomo, Markus, Ahmad Hendroyono, dan Dan Siti Maryam, ‘Implementasi Model Parate Executie Atas Jaminan Fidusia: (Uji Model Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia)’, Mmh Undip, 4.4 (2014) < 10.14710/mmh.43.4.2014.497-504 >.
Syafrida, Ralang Hartati, 'Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU/XVII/2019', ADIL, 11.1 (2020) < https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1447>.
Tawalujan, Kaisar M.B., 'Tinjauan Atas Eksekusi Fidusia Yang Dilakukan Di Bawah Tangan', Lex Privatum, 4.5 (2016).
Tedjosaputro, Liliana, ‘Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Terhadap Obyek Jaminan Fiducia’, Spektrum Hukum, 18.1 (2021) .
Authors who publish with Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
