Keharmonisan Keluarga, Konsep Diri dan Interaksi Sosial Remaja

Farida Yunistiati, M. As'ad Djalali, M. As'ad Djalali, M. As'ad Djalali, Muhammad Farid, Muhammad Farid, Muhammad Farid

Abstract


Abstract. This study aims to examine the relationship between family harmony and self-concept of the adolescent social interaction in vocational students. The population in this study were students of SMK PGRI 3 Madiun class XII, 173 students and tested answers after totaling 157 eligible students. Collecting data using a scale of family harmony, self-concept scale and social interaction made by researchers. Data analysis method used is multiple regression analysis techniques to be treated with the help of computer statistical program SPSS 18 series. Testing multiple regression analysis obtained R = 0.103 and F of 8.841 to p = 0.000 (P < 0.05), which means that family harmony and self-concept has a significant relationship with adolescent social interaction. The results of the analysis of the correlation between family harmony with social interaction indicates t = 3.541 and p = 0.001 (p < 0.05), which means there is a significant positive correlation between family harmony with social interaction. The result of the analysisof correlation between self-concept and social interaction showed t = 1.187 and p = 0.237 (p > 0.05), which means there is no significant correlation betweenself-concept and social interaction. R square = 0.103 shows that the two independent variables self-concept and family harmony together to contribute effectively to the social interactions of adolescents are 10.299% and 89.701% of orther variables influence adolescent social interaction dependent variable in this study.


Keywords : harmony family, self-concept, social interaction.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ancok. (1997). Teknik Penyusunan Skala Ukur. Jogjakarta: Pusat Penelitian Pusat Kependu-dukan Universitas Gajah Mada Pustaka Pelajar Omset.

Azwar, S. (1999). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi, Jogjakarta.

Cerulo. (2011). Interaksi Sosial: apakah No- Manusia terhitung?. Jurnal Rutgers Univer-city.

Cozby. (2009). Methods in Behavioral Rese-arch. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bell, Fisher, Bauon, Greene. Environmental Psychology. Program Pascasarjana Psikologi Untag Surabaya.

Benoit, dkk. (2009) Mood (suasana hati) dan pengujian positif dalam interaksi social. Belgia.

Bodenhausen. (2009). Challeges komplesitas identity untuk persepsi social dan interaksi social. Jurnal USA.

Bottero. (2009). Relasionalitas dan interaksi social. Jurnal Universitas Manchester.

Burns. (1993). Konsep diri. Jakarta: Penerbit Arca.

Brooks, W.D. Emmart. (1976). Interpersonal Comunity. Lowa: Brow Company Publiser dari http://www.duniapsikologi.com/konsep diri positif/negatif.

Djalali, MA. (2012). Petunjuk Teknis Penyu-sunan dan Penulisan Tesis. Surabaya: Pro-gram Pascasarjana Psikologi Untag.

Hadiwongso. (2010). Artikel nilai-nilai kebang-saan dari http://lppkb.wordpress.com/2010/ 07/07.

Gerungan. (1983). Psikologi Sosial. Bandung – Jakarta: PT. Uresco.

Giannetti, dkk. (2009). Interaksi Sosial dan Kegiatan Wirausaha. Jurnal Massachusetts Avenue Canbridge.

Hadi, S. (2004). Statistik 1, 2. Jogjakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Hadi, S. (2004). Analisis Regresi. Jogjakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Hadi, S. (2000). SPS 2000. Jogjakarta: Gajah-mada.

Home. (2012). Artikel Sifat Orang Yang terbuka dari

hhtp://www.g.excess.com/5451/ perbedaan sikap tertutup dan terbuka pada manusia.

hhtp://blogingbersama.blogspdt.com/2011/06/pengertian tanggung jawab.htm, diakses 17 April 2012.

John B. Nezle, Astrid Schutz, Michela, Schroder-abe, Veronika Smith.

(2011). Sebuah Studi Lintas Budaya; Hubungan Antara Interaksi social sehari-hari dan Lima ffaktor model kepribadian. Jurnal German.

Ma’sum. (2001). Hubungan antara Pola asuh Demokratis Orang tua dengan Interaksi social pada Remaja. Tesis, tidak dipubli-kasikan, Program Pascasarjana Psikologi Untag Surabaya.

Robin, J. (2007). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Wirawan, S. (1987). Teori-teori Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Gunungjati.

Shin. (2009). Memahami Diperensial Interaksi Sosial. Jurnal Korea.

Suryabrata, S. (1990). Psikologi Umum. Jogja-karta: CD. Rajawali.

Turiel. (2010). Domain Ketegasan Interaksi Sosial, Pemikiran Sosial dan Pembangunan Sosial, Jurnal U.S.A.

Tan, dkk. (2011). Keluarga mengalami harmo-nis dan ketidakharmonisan dalam psiko-terapy sistemik dan pengaruhnya terhadap kehidupan keluarga. Jurnal USA.

Utari. (2010). Keharmonisan keluarga dan Konsep diri dengan Kenakalan Remaja. Tesis, tidak diterbitkan, Program Pasca-sarjana Psikologi Untag Surabaya.

Wansuk, dkk. (2010). Budaya dan presentas diri: Pengaruh Interaksi Sosial dalam hubu-ngan social yang diharapkan.

Wiliam and Marry. (2011). Regulasi emosi dan kualitas interaksi social: apakah kemampuan untuk mengevaluasi situasi emiosional dan efektifitas mengidentifikasi itu penting? Jurnal USA.

Willis. (2008). Remaja dan Masalahnya. Ban-dung: Alfabeta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30996/persona.v3i01.371

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Farida Yunistiati, M. As'ad Djalali, M. As'ad Djalali, M. As'ad Djalali, Muhammad Farid, Muhammad Farid, Muhammad Farid

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Member & Supported By:


Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia
Fakultas Psikologi Untag Surabaya
ISSN (online): 2615-5268, ISSN (print): 2301-5985
Email: jurnalpersona@untag-sby.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats