SIMBOL KOMUNIKASI PEDAGANG KELILING DI SIDOSERMO SURABAYA

Bertharia Sanny Pratiwi, Hamim Hamim, Judhi Hari Wibowo

Abstract


This research was motivated by the communication symbol or symbols like
this is very attached to the Indonesian nation and even many people who are not aware
that it was applying the theory of communication in their daily lives. Emblem usefulness
as a tool to influence the communicant, a tool to make someone understand the message
delivered, the tools to make sense of the messages being delivered, means to connect the
communicator to the communicant, a tool to achieve a goal of communication. The sound
of street vendors around the place we live, with a characteristic sound when the merchant
was around the area where you live to peddle his wares. Pedlar or commonly referred to
PKL is the term given to the hawkers who use carts.
As for supporting this study, the authors in the manufacture thesis using
qualitative methods deskripstif. Goal authors is that the notion of communication Symbol
traders we need to understand more, because a lot of symbols - symbols of merchants that
we do not understand.
Keywords : symbol communication , trader


Full Text:

PDF

References


A.N. Montgomery, Symbolism, Cambridge

University Press, 1986.

Alexander, danFeules, dalampawito. Periklanan

Komunikasi Pemasaran .Jakarta , 2007 :

Ramdina Prakarsa.

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism:

Perspective and Method.

Brehm, J . W., & Cohen, A. R, (1966).

Explorations in cognitive dissonance.

New York: John Wiley.

Bungin. Burhan. 2012. Analisis Data Penelitian

Kualitatif. Raja Grafindo. Persada.

Jakarta.

Elly M. Setiadi. 2007. Ilmu Sosial Budaya

Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media

Group.

Frearing, Franklin. 2014. Handbook dalam

Penelitian dan Evaluasi. San Diego

California: Penguin Penerbit.

Leach. Tubbs, Culture and Communication,

Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Littlejohn, Stephen W. 2002. Theoritis of

Human Communication. Seventh.

Bandung.

McLeod ,Kosicki. 2014. The Handbook Of

Communication Science, Bandung :

Nusa Media.

Moleong, Lexy J.2002. Metodologi Penelitian

Kualitatif. Bandung : PT Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, Deddy, Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu

Pengantar, PT Remaja Rosdakarya,

Bandung, 2005.

Mulyana, Dedi. 2001. Metode penelitian

komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja.

Rosdakarya.

R.M. Charron, Society, Macmillan, 1979, hlm

-174.

S.T. Ritzer (2009). Communication theories and

other curios. Communication

Monographs,New York.

S.T. Ritzer, Symbols Around Us, Van Nostrand

Reinhold, New York, 2003.

Soeprapto, Riyadi. 2007. Teori Interaksi

Simbolik. Jakarta.

Suharto. 2004. Sosiologi memahami dan

mengkaji masyarakat. Bandung:

grafindo media pratama.

Sumardi Suryabrata. 2004. Metodologi

Penelitian, Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo

Persada.

Suprapto. 2002. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi.

Jakarta : PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

West, Richard. Lynn H. Furner. 2007. “

Pengantar Teori Komunikasi “. Jakarta.

Salemba Humanika.

Wiryanto. 2004. Teori Komunikasi Massa.

PT.Grasindo. Jakarta.

Zetlin, Irving B., dan A. Michael Huberman.

Analisis Data

Kualitatif. Universitas Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30996/representamen.v2i02.1397

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Bertharia Sanny Pratiwi, Hamim Hamim, Judhi Hari Wibowo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




Jurnal Representamen
Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Lihat Statistik Jurnal Representamen View MyStat