POLA KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL MAHASISWA YANG BERORIENTASI SEKSUAL GAY

  • Reza Ardiansyah Putra
  • Noorshanti Sumarah
  • AAI. Prihandari Satvikadewi

Abstract

This research entitled patterns of Interpersonal Communications Students with Gay sexual
orientation (a case study of Interpersonal Communication in daily interactions of Gay Students). The
purpose of this research is to know the symbols (Non Verbal Communication) and to know the symbol
language (Verbal communication) used in the gay student interact with her environment
(homosexuals and Heterosexuals) as well as how communication affects the gay student identification
in social environment in berinterak. that verbal and non verbal communication students in her social
environment is not gay so real in the world of hetroseksual. Gay covered many of which straddle
different from gay open is more conspicuous, even so homosexuals could identify one another from
the gaze of the eyes, body language, looks, and fragrances are used in excess, as well as language
and speech they use, but communication also happens to homosexuals in the virtual world by
demonstrating the full form of interaction and language use homosexual in shows themselves freely
on social media. In his intercourse the formation of gay student identification of its communication is
the creation of new languages to keep eksistentsinya and although most shut down, homosexuals have
always had a natural trait with hand gestures that are curved, and talk with supple lip movements that
are a little bit like a woman.
Key words: Interpersonal Communication Patterns, Gay Students in daily interactions.

References

Akbar, Ilham. 2011. Pola Komunikasi

Antarpribadi Kaum Homoseksual

Terhadap Komunitasnya di Kota

Serang (Studi Fenomenologi

Komunikasi Antarpribadi

Komunitas gay di Kota Serang

Banten). Skripsi. Program Studi Ilmu

Komunikasi, Universitas Sultan

Ageng Tirtayasa. Banten

Bungin, B. (2013). Metode Penelitian

Sosial & Ekonomi. Jakarta: Fajar

Interpratama Mandiri.

Hadi, T. (2000). Psikologi Kepribadian.

Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Hafied, C. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu

Komunikasi. jakarta: PT. Raja

Grafindo Persada.

http://adiyusuf2.blogspot.co.id/ 04-01-

(10.36)

http://atullaina.blogspot.co.id/2012/04/pen

gertian-homoseksual.html 04-01-

(11.47)

http://www.alodokter.com/faktor-penentuseseorang-

menjadi-homoseksual 06-

-2016 (22.10)

http://www.theory.org.uk/ctr-butl.html 07-

-2016 (23.07)

http://gayanusantara.or.id/sejarah.html 07-

-2016 (23.55)

http://gnintern.

blogspot.co.id/2009/05/kamus

-bahasa-gay.html 07-01-2016

(23.55)

J, M. L. (2007). Metode Penelitian

Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Kusworo, E. (2009). Fenomenologi

Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi.

Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.

Muhammad Budyatna, L. M. (2011). Teori

Komunikasi Antarpribadi. jakarta:

Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mulyana, D. (2008). Metode Penelitian

Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya .

Mulyana, D. (2010). Ilmu Komunikasi

Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT.

Remaja Rosdakarya.

Powell, J. (2008). Komunikasi

Antarpribadi. Jogjakarta: Konisiur.

Rakhmat, J. (2008). Psikologi Komunikasi.

Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sobur, A. (2004). Semiotika Komunikasi.

Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Stephen W. Littlejohn, K. A. (2014). Teori

Komunikasi. Jakarta: Salemba

Humanika.

Tarigan, Megawati. 2011. Komunikasi

Interpersonal Kaum Lesbi di Kota

Pontianak Kalimantan Barat.

Skripsi. Program Studi Ilmu

komunikasi, Universitas

Pembangunan Nasioanl “Veteranâ€.

Yogyakarta.

Uchjana, E. O. (2006). Ilmu Komunikasi

dan Praktek. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Published
2018-07-03
Section
Articles