Budaya Transaksional dalam Kelas Menengah, Diametral Pilihan antara Idealisme dan Pragmatisme (dalam Perspektif Sociological Imagination C.Wright Milss)

  • Arie Wahyu Prananta Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Zainal Abidin Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Abstract

Abstract

 

This article is to understand, analyze and interpret the movement diametrically space between idealism and pragmatism transaksionalisme cultural anti middle class groups conducted by using sociological perspectives Imagination C. Wright Mills. This article tries to find that the room is diametrically between idealism and pragmatism that appeared in diametraletis middle class anti-culture transaksionalisme get that high integrity to break away from the role of private and public roles, venue selection in anti culture transaksionalisme so they choose a place that can accommodate their anti-mainstream and dare to get out of your comfort zone, to change the system, although the risk will become a person who alienated, unpopular and always in solitude space. Diametric between idealism and pragmatism and for groups in the area of anti-culture transaksionalisme lighter because dilemma ethical in the role of his own, while a group in the area of power and politics is heavier because some can only see and experience the shock remarkable to stress but do not have the power to report it, some others even splashed in the cultural world transaksionalisme.

 

Keywords: Idealism, Pragmatism, diametraletis, sociological imagination

References

Benda, Julian Hary. 1999. “Pengkhianatan Kaum Cendekiawan, Terj. Winarsih P. Arifin, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama,.” “Pengkhianatan Kaum Cendekiawan, Terj. Winarsih

P. Arifin, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama,.”

Daniel Dhakidae. 2003. “Cendekiawan Dan Kekuasaan Dalam Negara Orde Baru, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Hal 62.”

Edward Said. 1998. “Peran Kaum Intelektual: Kuliah-Kuliah Reith Tahun 1993, Diterjemahkan Oleh Rin Hindryati P. Dan P. Hasudungan Sirait, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Hal.

” Edward Said. 1998. “Peran Kaum Intelektual: Kuliah-Kuliah Reith Tahun 1993, Diterjemahkan Oleh Rin Hindryati P. Dan P. Hasudungan Sirait, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Hal. 33.”

Faqih, Mansour. 1992. “Jalan Lain: Manifesto Intelektual Organik, Yogyakarta: INSIST.” Faqih, Mansour. “Jalan Lain: Manifesto Intelektual Organik, Yogyakarta: INSIST.”

Geary, Daniel. 2009. Radical Ambition, C. Wright Mills, the Left, and American Social Thought. Gingerich, D. W. 2014. “Yesterday’s Heroes, Today’s Villains: Ideology, Corruption, and Democratic Performance.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 26(2): 249–82. http://jtp.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0951629813495120.

Gramsci, Antonio. 1929. “Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, Available at London Publish 1929.” Gramsci, Antonio. 1929. “Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, Available at London Publish 1929.”

Heryanto, A. & Hadiz, V.R. 2005. “Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 37(2), Pp.251–275.”

Jefrey winters. 1988. “No Title.” Indonesia: The Rise of Capital Review 45((Apr., 1988)): 109– 128.

Kurzsman, C & Owens lins. 1993. “The Sociology of Intellectuals. Theory, Culture & Society, 10(3), Pp.69–80.”

Mannheim, K. 1993. “The Sociology of Intellectuals.” Theory, Culture & Society 10(3): 69–80. Mills, C. Wright. 1958. “The Structure of Power in American Society.” The British Journal of

Sociology 9(1): 29–41.

Quah, Jon S T. 1997. “Corruption In Asian Countries: Can It Be Minimized?” II(1). Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. “Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform.” Ch 4 Reducing Incentives and Increasing Costs: 263. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/cam029/98043631.html.

Stachowicz-Stanusch, Agata. 2013. “Relationship Between National Intellectual Capital and Corruption: Cross National Studies.”

Suseno, F M. 1997. “13 Tokoh Etika Sejak Jaman Yunani Sampai Abad Ke 19, Yogyakarta: Kanisius,.”

Talshier, G. 2005. “Intellectual as a Political Actor? Four Models of Theory / Praxis.” Wiratmo, S. 1986. “Cendekiawan Dan Politik Penerbit LP3ES, Jakarta.”

Wright Mills, C. 2013. The Sociological Imagination, Contemporary Perspective. Contempora. ed. Ann Nilsen Scoot John. United Kingdom.

———. 2014. “C. Wright Mills, the Power and Power of the Elite - a Reassessment.”

Published
2020-10-27