Measuring the Logistics Performance Index on the Logistics Market Evidence from the Indonesian logistic industry
Abstract
Performance Index is a tool for logistics bridging gaps that aims to measure supply chain efficiency, especially distribution. Reliability of delivery in the supply chain is key to logistics performance because consumer characteristics require a high degree of certainty about when and how to carry out processes. This study aims to determine the Logistics Performance Index model for Asian countries and its impact on world trade. This study is quantitative research by collecting forty logistics performance data based on data from the World Bank with logistical metrics related to six operational performances: tracking and tracing, customs, timeless, infrastructure, and international shipments. Descriptive analysis using Principle Component Analysis and TANAGRA software. The results of this study show that the two principal component (ζ) models formed significantly affect the best logistics performance in Asia.
Downloads
References
M. Barad and D. E. Sapir, “Flexibility in logistic systems - Modeling and performance evaluation,” in International Journal of Production Economics, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00107-5.
I. N. Pujawan, Inovasi Digital dan Logistik Indonesia : Pemikiran Kontemporer. 2018.
Z. Kamal, M. Lachgar, and H. Hrimech, “Blockchain , IoT and AI in logistics and transportation : A systematic review,” Transp. Econ. Manag., vol. 2, no. September, pp. 275–285, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.team.2024.09.002.
IMF, “WORLD ECONOMIC OUTLOOK INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND The Great Lockdown,” no. May, p. 177, 2020.
D. Aloini, E. Benevento, A. Stefanini, and P. Zerbino, “Process fragmentation and port performance: Merging SNA and text mining,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 51, no. February, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.012.
M. Ha, Z. Yang, T. Notteboom, A. K. Y. Ng, and M. Heo, “Revisiting port performance measurement : A hybrid multi- stakeholder framework for the modelling of port performance indicators,” Transp. Res. Part E, vol. 103, pp. 1–16, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.008.
S. Çakır, “Measuring logistics performance of OECD countries via fuzzy linear regression,” J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., vol. 24, no. 3–4, pp. 177–186, 2017, doi: 10.1002/mcda.1601.
M. M. Yu and B. Hsiao, “Measuring the technology gap and logistics performance of individual countries by using a meta-DEA–AR model,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 98–120, 2016, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2015.1037372.
M. H. Ha, Z. Yang, T. Notteboom, A. K. Y. Ng, and M. W. Heo, “Revisiting port performance measurement: A hybrid multi-stakeholder framework for the modelling of port performance indicators,” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., vol. 103, pp. 1–16, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.008.
A. M. R. Cabral and F. de S. Ramos, Cluster analysis of the competitiveness of container ports in Brazil, vol. 69. Elsevier Ltd, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.005.
A.-R. Kim and J. Lu, “A Study on the Evaluation of Port Competitiveness in Busan Port and Shanghai Port,” OALib, vol. 03, no. 04, pp. 1–8, 2016, doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102623.
M. Rosa Pires Da Cruz, J. J. Ferreira, and S. Garrido Azevedo, “Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 416–443, 2013, doi: 10.1057/mel.2013.14.
S. H. Woo, S. Pettit, and A. K. C. Beresford, “Port evolution and performance in changing logistics environments,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 250–277, 2011, doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.12.
T. C. Lirn, H. A. Thanopoulou, M. J. Beynon, and A. K. C. Beresford, “An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: A global perspective,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 70–91, 2004, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093.
G. T. Yeo, A. K. Y. Ng, P. T. W. Lee, and Z. Yang, “Modelling port choice in an uncertain environment,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 251–267, 2014, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.839515.
R. Teerawattana and Y. C. Yang, “Environmental Performance Indicators for Green Port Policy Evaluation: Case Study of Laem Chabang Port,” Asian J. Shipp. Logist., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.03.009.
P. M. Panayides and D. W. Song, “Evaluating the integration of seaport container terminals in supply chains,” Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 562–584, 2008, doi: 10.1108/09600030810900969.
L. Development and P. Measurement, “Logistics Development Strategies and Performance Measurement”.
ITF, “Drivers of Logistics Performance. A Case Study of Turkey Corporate Partnership Board Report,” ITF Corp. Partnersh. Board Rep., p. 53, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/15cpb_logistics-turkey.pdf
J.-F. Arvis et al., “Connecting to Compete 2018,” Connect. to Compete 2018, 2018, doi: 10.1596/29971.
W. H. Hausman, H. L. Lee, and U. Subramanian, “The impact of logistics performance on trade,” Prod. Oper. Manag., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 236–252, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01312.x.
B. Logistics and P. Perspectives, The performances of logistics services in developed and developing countries: A review and cluster analysis. 2014.
I. Katip, C. Universitesi, and S. Harun, “Analyzing the Dependency Between National Logistics Performance and Competitiveness: Which Logistics Competence is Core for National Strategy?,” J. Compet., vol. 2011, no. 4, pp. 4–22, 2011.
R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1173–1182, 1986, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
C. Wan, D. Zhang, X. Yan, and Z. Yang, “A novel model for the quantitative evaluation of green port development – A case study of major ports in China,” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., vol. 61, pp. 431–443, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.021.
P. H. Tseng and N. Pilcher, “Evaluating the key factors of green port policies in Taiwan through quantitative and qualitative approaches,” Transp. Policy, vol. 82, pp. 127–137, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.014.
A. Kaliszewski, A. Kozłowski, J. Dąbrowski, and H. Klimek, “Key factors of container port competitiveness: A global shipping lines perspective,” in Marine Policy, vol. 117, no. September 2019, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103896.
B. S. Sergi, V. D’Aleo, S. Konecka, K. Szopik-Depczyńska, I. Dembińska, and G. Ioppolo, “Competitiveness and the Logistics Performance Index: The ANOVA method application for Africa, Asia, and the EU regions,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 69, no. January, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102845.
W. Sheikh, M. M. H. Chowdhury, and K. K. Mahmud, “A comprehensive performance measurement model for maritime Logistics: Sustainability and policy approach,” Case Stud. Transp. Policy, vol. 14, no. October, p. 101097, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101097.
S. Cui, X. Gu, W. Xie, and D. Wu, “Research on Cold Chain Routing Optimization of Multi-distribution Center Considering Traffic Performance Index,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 221, pp. 1343–1350, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.08.124.
M. Qiu, L. Gao, Z. Lin, M. Zheng, and Q. Lin, “Green logistics optimization for coal supply in a power plant connecting maritime port,” Clean. Logist. Supply Chain, vol. 13, no. September, p. 100177, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.clscn.2024.100177.
H. E. Gürler, M. Özçalıcı, and D. Pamucar, “Determining criteria weights with genetic algorithms for multi-criteria decision making methods: The case of logistics performance index rankings of European Union countries,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 91, no. July 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101758.
V. Roy, S. K. Mitra, M. Chattopadhyay, and B. S. Sahay, “Facilitating the extraction of extended insights on logistics performance from the logistics performance index dataset: A two-stage methodological framework and its application,” Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., vol. 28, no. October 2017, pp. 23–32, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.10.001.
Authors who publish with Heuristic agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
