KETIDAKPASTIAN DAN KOMPLEKSITAS RANTAI PASOK DALAM KINERJA OPERASIONAL YANG BERKELANJUTAN

  • Soni Hartanto Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Keywords: Keywords, supply chain uncertainty, supply chain complexity, operational performance, resource dependence theory, supply chain strategy

Abstract

The purpose of this research plan is analyzing the different types of uncertainties and complexity in the supply chain and provide suggestion on strategies to deliver superior operational performance (OP) in disruption and dynamic situation using symmetrical and asymmetrical modeling approaches. Symmetrical modeling is applied via PLS-SEM in order to assess the theoretical relationships among the latent variables, while asymmetrical modeling is applied via fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to emphasize their combinatory causal relation.  This research contributes by providing an illustration of a PLS-SEM and fsQCA based estimation for the rapidly emerging field of sustainable supply chain management. This study assumes to provide empirical support for resource dependence theory (RDT) in explaining the relation between SCU and SCS as well as SCO and SCC which leads to sustainable OP.  From a methodological standpoint, this study also illustrates predictive validation testing of models using holdout samples and testing for causal asymmetry.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angkiriwang, Reina., Pujawan, I Nyoman., Santosa, Budi. Managing Uncertainty through supply chain flexibility: reactive vs proactive approaches: Production & Manufacturing Research, An open access Journal 2014. Vol.2, No.1, 50-70

Breton-Miller, L.; Miller, D. The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship. Strateg. Manag. J. 2015, 36, 397–415.

Bromiley, P.; Rau, D. Operations management and the resource-based view: Another view. J. Oper. Manag.2016, 41, 95–106.

Chandler, A.D., Jr. Strategy and Structure; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1962.

Colicchia, C.; Strozzi, F. Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag. 2012, 17, 403–418.

Fisher, M.L. What is the right supply chain for your product? Harv. Bus. Rev. 1997, 75, 105.

George, Joby., Pillai, V. Madhusudanan. A study of factors affecting supply chain performance: Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2019

Hult, G.T.M.; Ketchen, D.J.; Arrfelt, M. Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strateg. Manag. J. 2007, 28, 1035–1052.

Lee, H.L. Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2002, 44, 105–119.

Linton, J.D.; Klassen, R.; Jayaraman, V. Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. J. Oper. Manag. 2007, 25,1075–1082

Markley, M.J.; Davis, L. Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2007, 37, 763–774.

Qi, Y.; Zhao, X.; Sheu, C. The impact of competitive strategy and supply chain strategy on business performance: The role of environmental uncertainty. Decis. Sci. 2011, 42, 371–389

Salam, M.A.; Ali, M.; Seny Kan, K.A. Analyzing Supply Chain Uncertainty to Deliver Sustainable Operational Performance: Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Modeling Approaches. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2217

Serdasaran, Seyda. A review of supply chain complexity drivers; Computers & Industrial Engineering Volume 66, Issue 3, November 2013, Pages 533-540

Yusuf, Y.Y.; Gunasekaran, A.; Adeleye, E.O.; Sivayoganathan, K. Agile supply chain capabilities:Determinants of competitive objectives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 159, 379–392

Published
2021-05-28
Section
Articles