Examining the Legality of Adultery Restrictions for Laborers: A Study in Employment Law

  • M. Lutfi Rizal Farid Equitable Law Firm, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5829-2884
  • Muhammad Khananul Ikhsan Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Calvin Anthony Putra Universitas Pertahanan, Indonesia
Keywords: labor law, laborers/workers, adultery

Abstract

The research aims to analyze and propose recommendations concerning regulations prohibiting acts of infidelity committed by workers/laborers from the perspective of labor law. Unlike labor laws and regulations, which do not specifically address the prohibition of acts of infidelity, autonomous rules can address such provisions. This study employs a normative legal research methodology, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials serve as the basis for analysis. Findings indicate that provisions prohibiting acts of infidelity for workers/laborers can be integrated into autonomous principles without contravening existing laws and regulations. Furthermore, acts of infidelity may also fall under the purview of urgent offenses or criminal acts. The inclusion of such prohibitions in autonomous rules is not indicative of bad faith on the part of employers seeking to expedite termination of employment relations. Rather, it serves as a preventive measure against violations of laws, regulations, and ethical standards by workers/laborers. Regarding dispute resolution, termination of employment cannot be immediate in cases related to allegations of infidelity. Instead, due process must be followed to ascertain the veracity of such accusations and determine the culpability of the worker/laborer involved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardha, Dea Justicia, Nur Husni Emilson, Helwan Kasra, Yudistira Rusydi, Reny Okpirianty, Febrina Hertika Rani, and Hasanal Mulkan. “Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Zina.” Suluh Abdi 4, no. 2 (2022): 78–85.

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia VI Daring.” Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia, 2016. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/selingkuh.

Destrie Aisha, Berliana. “Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Yang Didasarkan Pada Pelanggaran Kerja Bersama.” Jurist-Diction 2, no. 1 (2019): 63–76.

Hanifah, Ida. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Di Indonesia. Medan: CV. Pustaka Prima, 2020.

Husni, Lalu. Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.

Iman Soepomo. Pengantar Hukum Perburuhan. Djambatan, 1987.

Khakim, Abdul. Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003. 2nd ed. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum. 15th ed. Jakarta: KENCANA, 2021.

Millah, Shofiyatul. “Citilink Larang Pilot Dan Pramugari Selingkuh Terbang, Kisah Cinta Terlarang Yang Terbongkar Di Media Sosial.” jurnalfaktual.id, 2024. https://jurnalfaktual.id/rupa-rupa/citilink-larang-pilot-dan-pramugari-selingkuh-terbang-kisah-cinta-terlarang-yang-terbongkar-di-media-sosial/.

Muhajarah, Kumla. “Perselingkuhan Suami Terhadap Istri Dan Upaya Penanganannya.” Sawwa 12, no. 1 (2016): 23–40.

Munawaroh, Nafiatul. “Kepergok Selingkuh, Bisakah Dipidana?” hukumonline, 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/kepergok-selingkuh-bisakah-dipidana-cl34.

Putri Amelia, Weny. “Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Akibat Tindakan Perselingkuhan Antar Pekerja Sekantor.” Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Jakarta, 2021.

R. Soesilo. KUHP Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politea, 1995.

R, Emilya Costa Yolanda, and Gunardi. “Pelaksanaan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Terhadap Pekerja Yang Terkena Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak Karena Kesalahan Berat Berdasarkan Putusan Mk No. 012/Puu-I/2003.” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 4, no. 2 (2021): 4682–4702.

Rizal Farid, M. Lutfi. “Analisis Yuridis Tentang Alasan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Karena Kesalahan Berat.” Novum 8, no. 3 (2021).

Rizal, Moch. Choirul, Rizki Dermawan, Mochammad Agus Rachmad, and Muhammad Fajar Sidiq Widodo. Ragam Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kediri: Lembaga Studi Hukum Pidana, 2022. https://repositori.lshp.or.id/index.php/buku/article/view/45/65.

Santoso, Budi. “Justifikasi Efisiensi Sebagai Alasan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 25, no. 3 (2014): 402. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16080.

———. “Pengaturan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dalam Perspektif Kepentingan Ekonomi Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Media Hukum 24, no. 2 (2017): 115–23. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2017.0087.115-123.

Sidik, Ahmad. “Psikologi Perselingkuhan: Asmara Di Atas Meja Kerja.” Kumparan, 2023. https://kumparan.com/sidika50068/psikologi-perselingkuhan-asmara-di-atas-meja-kerja-21hg2tFRMeG/full.

Suheri, Mhd, and Irwan. “Memviralkan Kasus Perselingkuhan Dalam Rumah Tangga Di Media Sosial Tiktok Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia 8, no. 3 (2023): 292–301.

Sulaiman, Abdullah, and Andi Walli. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan/Perburuhan. Pertama. Jakarta Timur: Yayasan Pendidikan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, 2019.

Voss, Guus Heerma Van, and Surya Tjandra. Bab-Bab Tentang Hukum Perburuhan Di Indonesia. Pertama. Bali: Pustaka Larasan, 2012.

Wijayanti, Asri. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Pasca Reformasi. 8th ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Published
2024-05-31