Legal Study on The Criminal Offense of Tax Invoice Forgery That Has Received Tax Amnesty
Abstract
This study aims to determine how the legal consequences of criminal acts of falsification of tax invoices that have received tax amnesty. Criminal acts in the field of taxation are violations of the rules of the tax law that cause state financial losses and people who commit criminal acts can be prosecuted criminally. /Falsification of tax invoices is a concern of legal problems among the community that has the potential to harm state revenue. Many people falsify tax invoices but do not understand the impact on the state. By falsifying tax invoices, the taxpayer will reduce their tax payable. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, secondary data type. As a result of this study, researchers found a form of criminal liability for the criminal act of falsifying tax invoices that have obtained tax amnesty in criminal law in Indonesia, in the form of excuse (schulduitsluitingsgrond-faits d'exuce) as a reason for criminal elimination (strafuitsluitingsgronden), so that the perpetrator should be stopped from investigating at the investigation level or if it has entered the trial stage, the Panel of Judges should issue a verdict of release from all legal charges for the actions committed by the defendant (ontslag van recht vervolging), even though the Criminal Act of Falsification of Tax Invoice is proven or the unlawful nature is not lost, but the defendant cannot be held criminally responsible, because there are reasons that excuse according to the law.
Downloads
References
Al-Firdaus, Farid. “Studi Eksploratif Penanganan Faktur Pajak Yang Tidak Berdasarkan Transaksi Yang Sebenarnya.” JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review) 1, no. 2 (2018): 14–30. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v1i2.194.
Asmadi Syam. “Measuring The Concept Of Restoration In Criminal Justice System.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 16, no. 2 (2022): 363–76.
Damayanti, Nendy, Puspita Adhy Surya Ningsih, and Andi Ersandi Ramadhan. “Law Enforcement in the Criminal Act of Taxation Against Unauthorized Tax Invoices Carried Out By Pt. Dc.” Journal Lex Suprema 4, no. 1 (2022): 947–61. http://money.kompas.com/read/2020/08/07/114100226/palsukan-faktur-pajak-wajib-pajak-ini-divonis-penjara-.
Dwiasty, Refniayu, Mulyati Pawennei, and Baharuddin Badaru. “Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Perlindungan Justice Collaborator Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) 5, no. 1 (2024).
Fauzi, Harry, Seri Mughni Sulubara, Murthada, and Syafridha Yanti. “Penanganan Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Juctice Di Wilayah Kota Banda Aceh.” LAWYER: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2023): 7–12. https://doi.org/10.58738/lawyer.v1i1.139.
Harahap, Nirwana Dewi. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Wajib Pajak Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Ditinjau Dari UU No. 28 Tahun 2007 Tentang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara Perpajakan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Maksitek 5, no. 3 (2020): 68. https://www.makarioz.sciencemakarioz.org/index.php/JIM/article/download/179/172.
Lestari, Rezky Ayu, Syarif Saddam Rivanie, and Slamet Sampurno Soewondo. “SIGn Jurnal Hukum Implementation of Restorative Justice for Narcotic Abusers :” 5, no. 1 (2023): 207–20.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.
Michelle, and Tanudjaja. “Analisis Penerapan Sistem Dan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Terhadap Pidana Pembuatan Faktur Pajak Fiktif” 2 (2024): 91–103.
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Mukhlis. Hukum Pelaksanaan Pidana Di Indonesia. Pekanbaru: Taman Karya, 2019.
Pratiwi, Siswantari. “Delik Penyertaan Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).” Binamulia Hukum 1, no. 11 (2022).
Ramadhita, Savitri, and Sartika Nanda Lestari. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Atas Pencabutan Izin Usaha Perusahaan Sekuritas Oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Kasus PT Brent Securities).” DIPONEGORO LAW JOURNAL. Vol. 8, 2019.
Siallagan, Newman Indra Permana, Harrtanto, and Putr Hafidati. “Analisis Tindak Pidana Sengaja Menerbitkan Dan /Atau Menggunakan Faktur Pajak Yang Tidak Berdasarkan Transaksi Yang Sebenarnya (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor: 394/Pid.Sus/2020./PN.JKT BRT).” Jurnal Pemandhu 4, no. 1 (2023): 52–62.
Tanudjaja, and Rita Listiyarini. “Penegakan Hukum Dalam Menyelesaikan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Mengenai Faktur Pajak Tidak Sah (Fiktif).” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. 1, no. April (2024): 971–81.
Wibowo, Ribut Hari. “Pendekatan Keadilan Restorative Dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 9, no. 2 (2021): 146–57. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.9.2.146-157.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
