The Role of Judges in Criminal Case Evidence : A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Thailand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v9i1.133037Keywords:
Criminal Justice System, Criminal Procedure Law , Evidentiary SystemAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of judges in the criminal evidence system based on the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana/KUHAP) and the Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand, as well as to identify the fundamental differences arising from the characteristics of each country’s judicial system. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches through document analysis of relevant literature and regulations. The findings indicate that Indonesia adopts the negative statutory evidentiary system (negatief wettelijk bewijstheorie), as regulated in Article 183 of the KUHAP, which requires at least two valid pieces of evidence accompanied by the judge’s conviction. The role of judges is active but remains within a strict procedural framework. Meanwhile, Thailand applies a mixed adversarial–inquisitorial system with a standard of proof of beyond reasonable doubt without a minimum evidentiary requirement. The Thai Criminal Procedure Code grants judges broad authority to examine facts, question witnesses, and order the collection of additional evidence, as stipulated in Sections 228, 229, and 235. A comparison of the two systems shows that Thailand positions judges as more dominant truth-finders, whereas Indonesia emphasizes a balance between formal legality and judicial conviction. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the structural and philosophical implications of both systems in the enforcement of criminal justice.
Downloads
References
Arya, L., Pambudi, R., & Purwanto, H. (2020). Peran Bantuan Ahli Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Pada Tahap Penyidikan. 1, 95–105. Https://Doi.Org/10.18196/Mls.V1i2.8345
Aling, Daniel F. “PERANAN VISUM ET REPERTUM DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA,” no. 2 (2023). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/49755
Anggara, Matius Evan, and Prija Djatmika. “THE AUTHORITY OF JUDGES IN GOVERNING THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN INDONESIA ’ S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM” 5, no. 5 (2025): 3942–47. DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.4010
Arya, Luthfi, Ravi Pambudi, and Heri Purwanto. “Peran Bantuan Ahli Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Pada Tahap Penyidikan” 1 (2020): 95–105. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v1i2.8345.
Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi. “The Evolution of Scientific Evidence Theory in Criminal Law: Transformative Insight.” Media Iuris 7, no. 2 (2024): 221–40. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v7i2.51095.
Gulo, Nimerodi, Cornelius Dikae, and Zolohefona Gulo. “Timbulnya Keyakinan Hakim Dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Di Peradilan Indonesia” 6, no. 3 (2024): 8115–22.
Hasanal. “PERANAN HAKIM DALAM PERSIDANGAN PERKARA PIDANA SEBAGAI PENGUBAH DAN PEMBAHARU HUKUM PIDANA” 16, no. 2021 (2021): 305–19.
keovalin Torpanyacharn. “Development of Legal Measures to Regulate Online Advertising of High Fat, Sugar or Sodium Foods and Beverages for Protecting Children and Youth” 8, no. 2 (2021): 21–31. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3949014
Khundiloknattawasa, Suwanna, Chiengtawan Yoddamnoen, and Aekkalak Nakphoung. “Regulation and Guideline for Juvenile Justice in Thailand : A Case Study of Drug-Related Offenses” 17, no. 2 (2022): 252–72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756123.
Onan Purba, Rumelda Silalahi. “PERAN ILMU KEDOTERAN FORENSIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN Onan Purba 1) Rumelda Silalahi 2).” Jurnal Retenrum 1, no. 02 (2023) http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v2i2.711
Pathomphong. “THE PROBLEMS ON THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION PROCESS OF THE POLICE OFFICERS : CASE STUDIES IN THAILAND” 7, no. 2023 (2023): 12–21 https://doi.org/10.14456/apsr.2023.7
Rahayu, Sri Dewi, and Yulia Monita. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika” 1 (2020): 125–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v14i1.98467
Rustamaji, Muhammad, Shalih Mangara Sitompul, Tojiboyev Sarvar Zafarovich, and Rahimah Embong. The Reduction of Criminal Justice Policy in Indonesia: Justice versus Virality. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System. Vol. 5, 2025. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.637.
Sanitphot, Pemika, Sunee Kanyajit, Thanapat Patchim, and Patchara Sinloyma. “Thai Police Officers and Prosecution of Children In” 16, no. 2 (2021): 316–31. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756078.
Stiklif John Ridel Loway. “KEDUDUKAN HAKIM DALAM PROSES PEMBUKTIAN PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA,” 2021.
Sudirman, Antonius, Konstantinus Bahang, and Joel Casimiro Pinto. “The Role of A Judge’s Conscience in Deciding Criminal Cases: Practice of Criminal Justice in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 6, no. 4 (2025): 2259–92. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i4.34799.
Tantikul, Thanyanuch. “Cultural Differences in Control : How Thailand ’ s Order-Centric Legal Mentality Shapes Its Constraining Lower-Court Practices,” 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745221148662.
Thatchapong, and Tidarat Cholprasertsuk. “Prosecution in Bad Faith under the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 161/1, Paragraph Two, and the Limitation of the Right to Prosecute,” no. December (2023): 295–308. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMHR/article/view/aA-020
Tianprasit, Yada Dejchai. “Safeguarding Vulnerable Victims Under the Criminal Procedure Code : Has Thailand Done Enough ?” 5, no. 1 (2025): 49–74. DOI:10.54157/tls.279620
Tuti Gusmawati Simanjuntak, Lili Rahmayana Harahap, and Ahmad Mulia Sembiring. “The Role of Visum Et Repertum in Proving Criminal Matters in Indonesia.” International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities 1, no. 2 (2024): 83–90. https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v1i2.164.
Wulandari, Eka, and Arrie Budhiartie. “Veteran Law Review Veteran Law Review,” no. 1 (2023): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v8i1.10108
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
