PEMBATASAN PEMILIKAN DAN PENGUASAAN HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF REFORMA AGRARIA

Authors

  • Natanael Dwi Reki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v0i0.1767

Abstract

The urgency of proprietary restriction and domination over the land more emphasized on the society’s interests at large. This view rely on philosophy of Pancasila related to the social justice meaning for whole Indonesia citizen. Then this restriction implementation intended State endowed a justice for land owner particularly the investors. State warrant the restriction by over taking   and revoke land title right and either individually or business entity whenever it against the general accepted. It remind the spirit of Article 33 paragraph (3) said : “earth and water and the richness contained inside them powered by State and utilized as much as possible for the people’s prosperityâ€. This provision confirmed by restriction guarantee through Article 7, 8, 9 and 10 which relevance with land domination restriction. Therefore in this case it is necessary to be organized and improvement in land restriction implementation systematically connected with agraria reform. Government enact the policies over attribution authority by laws to perform the restriction on domination and land proprietary for the sake of justice for whole Indonesia citizen. These authority can be run through concrete methods that is doing an action take over and revoke the land title permit as regulated Article 18 UUPA (Agraria Law).

Keywords: land proprietary, land domination, restriction guarantee, article 33 paragraph (3)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, A. (1991). Psikologi sosial (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Ahmadi, A. (2007). Psikologi sosial. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. ResearchGate.

Anwar, S. (2014). Pemikiran dan gerakan amr ma'ruf nahy munkar front pembela islam (fpi) di indonesia 1989 - 2012. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam , Volume 4, Nomor 1, 220 - 250.

Bahri, S. (2016, Oktober 14). FPI Demo, Foto Ahok Dipotong Pakai Parang. Retrieved Maret 17, 2018, from Tribunnews Aceh: http://aceh.tribunnews.com/amp/2016/10/14/fpi-demo-foto-ahok-dipotong-pakai-parang

Galtung, J. (1975). Entropy and general theory of peace. Peace: Research education action, essays in peace redearch. Volume 1.

Kite, M. E., & Whitley Jr, B. E. (2016). Psychology of prejudice and discrimination (Third Edition). Oxford UK: Routledge.

Myers, D. G. (2012). Psikologi sosial Edisi 10 Buku 2. Jakarta Selatan: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.

Nelson, T. D. (2016). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Pamungkas, A. S., & Octaviani, G. (2017). Aksi bela islam dan ruang publik muslim: dari representasi dari ke komunitas luring. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi UGM , Volume 4 No. 2, 65 - 87.

Perwita, Sabban A.A, Nabilla. (2015). Kajian konflik dan perdamaian. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu

Rini, A. P., Suryanto & Matulessy, A. (2016). The influence of private conformity, group self-esteem, fanaticism and obedience toward the aggressiveness of political party partisan. International Journal of Humanistics and Social Science Invention.

Riyanti. (2015). Intensi mencontek ditinjau dari theory of planned behavior. Jurnal Psikologi Terapan.

Syaf. (2016, Desember 30). Peneliti: teman FPI makin banyak setelah kasus penistaan agama ahok. Retrieved Maret 17, 2018, from VOA Islam: http://m.voa-islam.com/news/indonesiana/2016/12/30/48203/peneliti-teman-fpi-makin-banyak-setelah-kasus-penistaan-agama-ahok/

Wildan, M. (2016). Aksi damai 411-212, kesalehan populer, dan identitas muslim perkotaan indonesia. Maarif , Vol. 11, No. 2 (Setelah "Bela Islam": Gerakan Sosial Islam, Demokratisasi, dan Keadilan Sosial), 188 - 202.

Woodward, M., & Nurish, A. (2016). Quo vadis FPI dalam aksi bela islam. Maarif , Vol. 11 No. 2 (Setelah "Bela Islam" : Gerakan Sosial Islam, Demokratisasi, dan Keadilan Sosial ), 105 - 122.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-01