Reframing Prosecutorial Legitimacy: Embracing Restorative Justice in Criminal Case Discontinuation

  • Bintang Sekar Ayu Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Prosecutor, Termination of Prosecution, Restorative Justice

Abstract

This research aims to find out and understand the scope of the Prosecutor's office, especially in the field of prosecution in the criminal justice system, as explained in this journal, namely regarding regulations related to the authority of the Prosecutor in implementing the termination of prosecution for criminal cases based on the principle of restorative justice and regarding obstacles to the implementation of restorative principles. justice at the prosecution stage. This research was carried out using a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach using library data, namely normative juridical, which was carried out by examining library materials or secondary materials that were collected and analyzed qualitatively. The authority of the Prosecutor's Office in implementing the Termination of Prosecution is strictly regulated in the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution based on Restorative justice and is supplemented by the Circular Letter of the Deputy Attorney General for General Crimes Number 01/E/EJP/02/2022 dated 10 February 2022 and in its implementation Restorative justice is considered capable of being a solution in resolving cases quickly with the main principle of prioritizing participation between victims, perpetrators and the community as well as restoration of a situation. Furthermore, in implementing the termination of prosecution of a case, it is not impossible that there are obstacles that must be faced by the Prosecutor as Public Prosecutor, especially in reconciling the interests of the victim and the perpetrator in achieving peace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A., Ady Thea D. “LBH Makassar Beberkan Tantangan Penerapan Restorative Justice.” hukumonline.com, 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/lbh-makassar-beberkan-tantangan-penerapan-restorative-justice-lt646455fc68367/?page=2.

Andira, Ira. “PENERAPANRESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA (Studi Kasus Di Polres Tebing Tinggi).” Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) 1, no. 1 (2018): 29–43. http://jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id/index.php/IHP/article/view/72.

Cornelius, Arilasman, and Beniharmoni Harefa. “Penerapan Restoratif Justice Dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Yuridis 8, no. 1 (2021): 83–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v8i1.2734.

Effendy, Marwan. Kejaksaan RI: Posisi Dan Fungsinya Dari Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005.

Gunawan, T J. Konsep Pemidanaan Berbasis Nilai Kerugian Ekonomi: Menuju Sistem Hukum Pidana Yang Berkeadilan, Berkepastian, Memberi Daya Deteren Dan Mengikuti Perkembangan Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: Genta Press, 2015.

Hanum, Cholida. “Prospek Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Veritas 7, no. 1 (2021): 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v7i1.1231.

Herlina, Apong. “Restorative Justice.” Indonesian Journal of Criminology 3, no. 3 (2004): 4244. http://journal.ui.ac.id/index.php/jki/article/view/1247.

Ibrahim, Jhonny. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia Publishing, 2013.

Iskandar, Rudi. “Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Pendekatan Asas Restoratif.” Matriks Jurnal Sosial Dan Sains 3, no. 1 (2021): 27–35. https://doi.org/https://matriks.staiku.ac.id/index.php/jmt/article/view/76.

Kristiana, Yudi. Independensi Kejaksaan Dalam Penyidikan Korupsi. PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2018.

Macawalang, Candlely Pastorica. “Penerapan Dan Pengaruh Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Lex Crimen 10, no. 5 (2021): 142–50. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33432.

Manthovani, Reda. “Melihat Urgensi Terbitnya UU Keadilan Restoratif.” hukumonline.com, 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/melihat-urgensi-terbitnya-uu-keadilan-restoratif-lt63d752f9bad03/?page=all.

Nurdiyanto, Wahyu. “Pengaturan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif Sebuah Langkah Progresif Kejaksaan.” timesindonesia.co.id, 2020. https://www.timesindonesia.co.id/read/news/288144/.

Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (n.d.).

Pohan, Husein, Madiasa Ablisar, Marlina Marlina, and Mohammad Ekaputra. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dengan Pendekatan Restorative Justice Yang Dilakukan Oleh Kejaksaan: Studi Kasus Di Kejaksaan Negeri Medan.” Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2023): 52–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v3i1.41.

Suratman, and Philips Dillah. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Ke-2. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014.

Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia (n.d.).

Waluyo, Bambang. Desain Fungsi Kejaksaan Pada Restorative Justice. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.

Wicaksana, Pradnya. “Pakar Hukum Pidana Unair Berikan Catatan Kritis Dalam Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif.” fh.unair.ac.id, 2022. https://fh.unair.ac.id/pakar-hukum-pidana-unair-berikan-catatan-kritis-dalam-penerapan-keadilan-restoratif/.

Yulia, Rena. Viktimologi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Bandung: Graha Ilmu, 2010.

Published
2024-05-29