Legality of Electronic Contracts in the Context of Good Faith Principle Application in E-Commerce Transactions within the Modern Economy: A Review Based on Wilstheorie
Abstract
Seeing the many facilities provided by E-commerce, especially related to electronic contracts, legal problems arise from the side of civil law related to the validity of the agreement and the legal relationship of the parties. This research aims to determine the validity of electronic contracts from the perspective of the application of the principle of good faith in e-commerce transactions in the context of modern economics according to Wilstheorie. Electronic contracts are the result of advances in technology and information, where buying and selling transactions are carried out online through electronic media. The provisions regarding the legal requirements and legal force of electronic contracts in the laws governing electronic transactions are still uncertain. Electronic contracts are often made in a standardized contract format, where the clauses made do not pay attention to the application of the principle of good faith and applicable laws and regulations. Wilstheorie emphasizes the importance of moral and intellectual agreements with integrity and honesty and has an important role in shaping social structures that are not only fair but also sustainable. The research method used in this scientific work is normative juridical research method. The results of this study state that Wilstheorie about standard contracts is an agreement or contract based on a shared understanding of the values and principles that underlie common life in society with integrity and honesty. This concept emphasizes the importance of moral and intellectual agreements in shaping a fair and sustainable social order.
Downloads
References
Agus Yudha Hernoko. Hukum Perjanjian, Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersil. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.
Amalia, Selma Dwi, Gian Muzakir Hayat, Hafizh Aulia Rahman, and Mouna Suez Sianturi. “Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Kontrak Online Pada Layanan,” no. December (2023).
Amiruddin, and Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.
Ani Purwati. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori Dan Prakte. Surabaya: CV. Jakad Media Publishing, 2020.
Cahayani, Dian. “Kesepakatan Dalam Perjanjian Sebagai Langkah Preventif Terhadap Pencegahan Wanprestasi.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial 2, no. 10 (2023): 1–3. https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/JISOS/article/view/7315.
Farhan, Ibnu A’thillah, and Moh. Safil Kafi. “Peranan Pelaksanaan Asas Iktikad Baik Dalam Hukum Perjanjian.” Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student 1, no. 2 (2023): 532–38.
Fatimatuzzahra, Maria Franciska Limanto, Frangky Jonatan, and Imelda Martinelli. “Efektivitas Legalitas Kontrak Elektronik Dalam Transaksi Elektronik Berdasarkan Hukum Perikatan.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 2 (2023): 2176–84.
Josephine, Josephine, Sinta Dewi Rosadi, and Sudaryat Sudaryat. “Perlindungan Konsumen Daring Dan Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Marketplace Atas Data Privasi Konsumen.” Jurnal Suara Keadilan 21, no. 1 (2020): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.24176/sk.v21i1.5686.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.
Nugraha, Ida Bagus Prasadha Sidhi Nugraha, and I Gede Ysa. “Legalitas Kontrak Perdagangan Secara Ditinjau Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.” Kertha Semaya 8, no. 5 (2020): 689–98.
Nurhayati, Bernadeta Resti. “Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Sebagai Dasar Pembatalan Perjanjian.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 5, no. 1 (2019): 66. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i1.16752.
R. Subekti. Hukum Acara Perdata, 1981.
Rudy, Dewa Gde, and I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari. “Kekuatan Mengikat Klausula Arbitrase Dalam Kontrak Bisnis Dari Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 11, no. 2 (2022): 427–37. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p14.Klausula.
Shidarta. “Teori Timbulnya Perjanjian Dalam Transaksi Konsumen Elektronik.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 12, no. 2 (2023): 185–210.
Sopamena, Ronald Fadly. “Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian.” Batulis Civil Law Review 2, no. 1 (2021): 1. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.451.
Sudarini, Ni Luh Putu, and dewa gede pradnyana yustiawan. “Keabsahan Kontrak Secara Elektronik Sebagai Alat Pembuktian Di Tinjau Secara Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik 1, no. 4 (2023): 266–75.
Susiana. “Kontrak Baku Franchise Ditinjau Dari Ketentuan Unidroit Dan KUH Perdata.” Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 1 (2015): 61–82.
Wijaya, Kadek Agus Mahendra, A. A Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Perijinan Dan Tindak Pidana Terhadap Juru Parkir Liar Di Kota Denpasar.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 4, no. 3 (2022): 260–65. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.4.3.2022.260-265.
Authors who publish with DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
