The Role Of Visum Et Repertum As Evidence In Rape Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.13178Keywords:
Evidence, Visum et repertum, RapeAbstract
Visum and repertum is one of tool very important evidence in the process of enforcement law criminal, especially in case rape in general own difficulty proof consequence lack of witness eyes and often occurs in the space private. In context this, visa functioning as proof scientific that can confirm existence act violence sexual through findings medical objective, such as wound physical, damage to the reproductive organs, or footsteps biological perpetrators. Research This aiming for analyze in a way deep role strategic visa and report in proof law to case rape in Indonesia, as well as identify obstacles that affect its effectiveness. Method research used is approach legal normative and juridical empirical. Approach legal normative done with analyze provision law positive laws in force, such as the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP), while approach legal empirical done through studies field, including interview with apparatus enforcer law like police and prosecutors, as well as power medical forensics involved direct in the process of making visa. Research results show that visa and report own position strategic in proof elements act criminal rape, especially in prove element violence or threat violence as well as the occurrence connection sexual without victim's consent. Although thus, the effectiveness visa often hampered by various factors, including delays reporting by victims due to trauma or shame, lack of victim's understanding of urgency inspection medical quick after events, and limitations power experts and means infrastructure forensics in the regions isolated.
Downloads
References
Ali, Ismail, Junardi, and Andi Sulfiati. “Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ismail.” LEGAL: Journal of Law Vol. 2, no. 1 (2023): 43–55.
Anindita, Stephanie Renni, Christria Firsi Kiling, Wulandary Wungkana, and Birgitta Wangsa Winatha. “Penentuan Derajat Perlukaan Pada Visum et Repertum Korban Hidup: Tantangan Dan Solusi Bagi Dokter Umum.” Proceeding Masyarakat Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia 1, no. 01 (2024): 371–80.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Teori Dan Kapita Selekta Kriminologi. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2007.
DAUBERT. “Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993).” SpringerReference 509 (1993): 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/springerreference_183722.
Dewi, I Gst A.A Sintiana. “Legal Study Of Visum Et Repertum in the Stage of The Investigation in Disclosing the Crime Follow Up.” GaneshaCivicEducationJournal 2, no. 1 (2020): 30–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/gancej.v2i1.339.
Dr. Drs. Muzakkir, Dr. Drs. Muzakkir. “The Role of Visum Et Repertum as Evidence in The Crime of Rape.” International Journal of Social Science and Human Research 07, no. 01 (2024): 498–506. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-65.
FADILLA KHAN SAPUTRI, MIFTAHUL. “KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN VISUM ET REPERTUM DALAM PENGUNGKAPAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN (Studi Putusan Nomor 164/Pid. B/2018/PN Pre),” 2021.
Fardhyanti, Ardhya Fauzah, and Puti Priyana. “Visum Et Repertum Dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Pemerkosaan.” Widya Yuridika 5, no. 2 (2022): 389. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i2.3589.
Fatika syahda, Illa, and Herli Antoni. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kasus Pembunuhan Dengan Racun Sianida.” Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (July 2024): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrih.v4i1.3298.
Firmansyah, Muhammad, and Frans Simangunsong. “The Position of Visum Et Repertum as Evidence in Proving Criminal Cases in Indonesia” 7 (2024): 58–66.
Fromm, Erich. The Anatomi of Human Destructivenes, Terjemahan Imam Muttaqin. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2000.
Gusria Amara, Risdalina Siregar, and Indra Kumala Sari Munthe. “Role Of Visum Et Revertum And Provision In The Process Of Civil Action And Proposal Of Coveration (Study Resolution Number 50/Pid.Sus-Kids/2023/Pt Medan).” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 4, no. 3 (2024): 155–64. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.326.
Indonesia, Republik. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) No. 8 Tahun 1981, Kuhap § (1981).
Khoirunnisa, and Dani Sintara. “Kedudukan Visium et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Terhadap Tindakan Pidana Pemerkosaan (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Sei Rampah Kabupaten Serdang Bedagai).” Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains 2, no. 02 (2023): 102–11. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i02.209.
Luh, Ni, Putu Ratih, Sukma Dewi, I Gusti Ngurah, and Parikesit Widiatedja. “Visum Et Repertum As Medical Legal Aspect to Foreigners As Victims Of Sexual Violence in Indonesia,” 2024, 946–61. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i04.p14.
Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto; Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Cet. 16. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.
Meilia, Putri Dianita Ika. “Prinsip Pemeriksaan Dan Penatalaksanaan Korban (P3K) Kekerasan Seksual.” Cermin Dunia Kedokteran 39, no. 8 (2012).
Misky, Nanda Raihanal. “PERANAN VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMERKOSAAN DI ACEH (Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh No.7/JN/2021/MS.Aceh).” Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, 2022.
———. “Peranan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Di Aceh (Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Syar�iyah Aceh No. 7/Jn/2021/Ms. Aceh).” UIN Ar-Raniry Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, 2023.
Noupel, M, Yanti Romlahayati, Ari Nurhaqi, Raden Henda, and Dessy Ika Putri. “The Power of Proof of Visum Et Repertum as Evidence in Murder Cases : A Case Study of Vina ’ s Murder” 2, no. 3 (2024): 231–42. https://doi.org/10.62885/legisci.v2i3.567.
Nurani, Siti Syahida, Absori Absori, Khudzaifah Dimyati, Kelik Wardiono, Zainur Wula, Arief Budiono, and Heru Santoso Wahito Nugroho. “The Visum et Repertum Forensic Examination as Evidence of a Rape Crime in the Trial Process of Kupang District Court.” Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology 14, no. 1 (2020): 1436–40. https://doi.org/10.37506/v14/i1/2020/ijfmt/193114.
Putri Natalie, Velisia, and I Made Wirya Darma. “Visum et Repertum as Evidence in Sexual Violence Prosecutions : A Criminal Law Literature Review.” Justisi 9, no. 3 (2023): 303–25. https://doi.org/10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v9i3.2427.
Samatha, Sie Ariawan, Tuntas Dhanardhono, and Sigid Kirana Lintang Bhima. “Aspek Medis Pada Kasus Kejahatan Seksual.” Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro (Diponegoro Medical Journal) 7, no. 2 (2018): 1012–29.
Sandicka Niar. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI HAKIM DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA CONTEMPT OF COURT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 1050/ Pid.B/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst).” Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, 2020.
Sepna Tampubolon (B1A023183). “KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ANTARA VISUM ET REPERTUM DENGAN KETERANGAN SAKSI PADA SUATU TINDAK PIDANA.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 6 (2024): 81–90. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461.
Sudarto. Hukum Pidana Dan Perkembangan Masyarakat (Kajian Terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana). Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1986.
Sughondo, R. Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anak. Bandung: Sinar Grafika, 1995.
Takahashi, M. “Sexual Offense Prosecution and Forensic Evidence in Japan.” Asian- Pacific Law & Policy Journal 21, no. 2 (2020): 148–70.
Tuti Gusmawati Simanjuntak, Lili Rahmayana Harahap, and Ahmad Mulia Sembiring. “The Role of Visum Et Repertum in Proving Criminal Matters in Indonesia.” International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities 1, no. 2 (November 2024): 83–90. https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v1i2.164.
Verawati, Raras, Sidik Sunaryo, and Yaris Adhial Fajrin. “Penyidikan Kasus Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku (Studi Di Kepolisian Resort Kota Batu).” Indonesia Law Reform Journal 2, no. 2 (2022): 222–36. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i2.22376.
Vries, I., & van den Eshof, P de. “Forensic Medical Examination in Sexual Assault Cases in the Netherlands: Legal Framework and Practice.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 67 (2021). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100505.
Werembinan, Petrus Carol, and Widhi Cahyo Nugroho. “Keabsahan Visum Et Repertum Dan Visum Psikiatrikum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan.” Journal Evidence Of Law 3, no. 3 (September 2024): 284–91. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i3.772.
Yamamoto, H., & Matsui, T. “Handling of Forensic Medical Evidence in Sexual Crime Cases in Japan: Issues and Improvements.” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 7, no. 5 (2018): 47–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.08.014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
