Legal Protection for Trademark Applicatints in Good Faith in Retroactive issuance of Certificate Based On Supreme Court Decision

Muhammad Aditya Pramana; Fokky Fuad; Suartini Suartini

doi:10.30996/dih.v0i0.132312

Authors

Muhammad Aditya Pramana Al-Azhar University Indonesia
Fokky Fuad Al-Azhar University Indonesia
Suartini Suartini Al-Azhar University Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.132312

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Trademark Applicant, Retroactive Certificate

Abstract

The process by which a trademark certificate issued by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property is retroactively valid from the date the trademark registration application is submitted, not from the date the certificate is officially issued . brand which was resolved through criminal channels in Court Nganjuk State with the Defendant Rudy Mulyanto who can analyzed more far is a dispute between Trademarks resolved through criminal channels which then in the Cassation Decision at the Supreme Court Number 3733 K / Pid.Sus / 2020 Rudy Mulyanto was declared not legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a crime as in the First or Second indictment. The research method used is normative juridical library materials or secondary data as basic material for research by conducting a search for regulations and literature related to the problem being studied. The results of this study are that legal protection for trademark certificates issued by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia is retroactive from the date of submission of the application, not from when the certificate was issued. In the Decision of this trademark dispute case, there was negligence in providing legal protection to the applicant or trademark registrant, the author does not agree with the decision of the panel of judges at the first level and the high court level and concludes that trademark disputes should be resolved first through civil channels, while criminal channels are used as a last resort in resolving trademark disputes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amelia Cahaya, Kristina Dwi Wulan Asri, Witta Dewi Mustika Takarsi, R. S. A. “Perlindungan HKI Terhadap Merek Dagang ‘Ps Glow’ (Analisis Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/Pn.Niaga Sby).” Jurnal Riset Hukum Dan Pancasila, n.d.

Angelica, Catherine, Gunardi Lie, and Moody P Rizqy Syailendra. “Sengketa Hak Merek Dagang Geprek Bensu Melawan I Am Geprek Bensu.” Nilai Budaya Indigenous Sebagai Pendukung Sustainable Development Di Era Industri 4.0., 2021, 311–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/pserina.v1i1.16381.

Anggraen, Adelia Dwi, Budi Santoso, and Adya Paramita Prabandari. “Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Pada Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah (UMKM) Di Bidang Pengrajin Batik Dan Kuliner.” Notarius 14, no. 2 (2021): 650–65. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43711.

Ar, Azhari, M Hum, and Daniel Simanungkalit. “Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Merek Terdaftar Pertama Atas Tindakan Pendaftaran Oleh Pihak Lain (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 750 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018).” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Hikmah 1, no. 2 (2020): 208–24.

Betlehn, Andrew, and Prisca Oktaviani Samosir. “Merek Industri Umkm Di Indonesia.” Law Dan Justice Jurnal 3, no. 1 (2018): 3–11.

Bimarcelline Agatha, and Krisnadi Nasution. “ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR. 836 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022 TENTANG PEMBATALAN MEREK TERDAFTAR ‘STARBUCKS ROKOK.’” Yustisi 11, no. 1 (2024): 170–82. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v11i1.16201.

Elvira Rosa Astrianto, Kiara Dhafa Nahdah Azalia, Natalia Evira Palit, Ramot Andrew Christian Siagian, Rumagam Amputua Hasian Siregar, and Asep Saripudin. “Penggunaan Merek Atas Peningkatan Pendapatan Dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek UMKM Sego Pedes Basman.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik 2, no. 1 (2023): 144–52. https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i1.2110.

Joy Sinaga, Syafrida, Erna Amalia. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENDAFTAR MEREK PERTAMA BERDASARKAN PRINSIP FIRST-TO-FILE TERHADAP PERKARA MEREK STRONG (STUDI KASUS : NOMOR 22PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022).” Jurnal Kliendi Law 1, no. 1 (2022): 1–16.

Kusuma, Nadya Enjelin, and R Rahaditya. “Tinjauan Prinsip Itikad Baik Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Sengketa Merek (Studi Putusan Nomor 3/Pdt. Sus. Hki/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Mdn).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4516–23.

Lathif, Nazaruddin. “Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana Alat Untuk Memperbaharui Atau Merekayasa Masyarakat.” Palar | Pakuan Law Review 3, no. 1 (2017): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v3i1.402.

Maharani, Raden Ajeng Cendikia Aurelie, and Hernawan Hadi. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK ATAS MEREK ASING DI INDONESIA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 264/K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015).” Jurnal Privat Law 8, no. 1 (2020): 130. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v8i1.40386.

Mahfuz, Abdul Latif. “Problematik Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 2 (2020): 47. https://doi.org/10.32502/khdk.v1i2.2592.

Muliasari, Ruri Suci, Budi Santoso, and Irawati Irawati. “Pelanggaran Prinsip Itikad Baik Dalam Sengketa Merek Internasional.” Notarius 14, no. 2 (2021): 972–589. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43788.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis, BPK Ri § (2016).

Puteri, Megawangi Kusumaning (2023). “ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGGUNAAN HAK ATAS MEREK YANG MENYERUPAI MEREK ORANG LAIN ANTARA MEREK MS GLOW DENGAN PS GLOW (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR: 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga Mdn Dan 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga Sby). U.” Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur., 2023.

Republik Indonesia. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” JDIH BPK, 2009.

Roisah, Kholis. “Kebijakan Hukum ‘Tranferability’ Terhadap Perlindungan Hak.” Jurnal Law Reform 11, no. 2 (2015): 241–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i2.15772.

Sandi Yudha Prayoga, Reza Adi Hioctava Darsana. “STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 3733 TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK RUDY MULYANTO.” Justice Dialectical 1, no. 1 (2022): 24–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70720/jjd.v1i1.13.

Soekanto, S. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Sulasno, and Uul Nabila. “Penerapan Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Atas UMKM Melalui.” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (AsIAN) 08, no. 01 (2020): 27–32.

Suryasaladin, Ranggalawe. “Pengembangan Kapasitas Usaha Kecil Menengah Dalam Memanfaatkan Sistem Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Peningkatan Daya Saing Usaha.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 1 (2020): 159. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2488.

Wilopo, Tjahyo Harry. Jurus Jitu Membangun Merek Untuk UKM. Grhatama Pustaka, 2007.

WIPO. “Membuat Sebuah Merek: Pengantar Merek Untuk Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah.” In Publikasi WIPO No. 900, 3, 2008.