MENGGUGAH FONDASI KEILMUAN ILMU HUKUM DALAM PENGAKUAN PERKAWINAN HOMOSEKSUAL DI MASSACHUSETTS MELALUI EFISIENSI EKONOMI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.1787Keywords:
law and economics, efficiency, homosexual marriagesAbstract
Law and economics are two independent sciences that compliment each other in analyzing forms of legal issues. The limitations of each independent sciences in fact have brought these two came even closer in resolving the issue of the legalization of homosexual marriages in Massachusetts. As a scientific method, Law and Economics, also known as the economic analysis of law, explores the law and jurisprudence in new ways through different dimensions. The use of economics broaden the field of law especially as a tool to create incentives to change human behavior in achieving its objectives based on its idealism of efficiency. The use of Law and Economics in this writing provided economic rationales that the legalization of homosexual marriages in Massachusetts are efficient therefore the law shall produce rules that lead to the most efficient change that the society desire the most.
Downloads
References
Andisti dkk. (2011). Religiusitas dan Perilaku Seks Bebas pada Dewasa Awal. Jurnal Psikologi Volume 1, No. 2, 170.
Azwar, Saifuddin. (2004). Dasar-dasar Psikometri. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
________,__. (2004). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baron, Robert dan Donn Byrne. (2004). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Haboddin, Muhtar. (2013). Konflik Partai: Perbandingan Antara PKB Dan PDIP. governance, Vol.1, No. 2.
Kerlinger, F. (2004). Asas – Asas Penelitian Behavioral. Edisi 3. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.
Rowell Huesmann, L. (2010). The Effect of Religious Participation on Aggression Over One’s Lifetime and Across Generations. Journal of University of Michigan and Bowling Green State University.
Muller, E.N & Godwin, R.K. (1984). Democratic and Aggressive political participation: Estimation of a Nonrecursive model. Journal Political Behavior Vol 6. No.2.129-146
Ritter and Hernandez. (2010). Principles of Religious Prosociality: A Review and Reformulation . Journal compilation: 574-590
Sugiyono, Prof.Dr. (2008). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susan, Novri. (2010). Surplus kekerasa Lokal. Jawa Pos
Suyanto, Badrun. (2013). Memahami Perilaku Agresif (Sebuah Tinjauan Konseptual). Jurnal psikologi .Vol. 16 No. 03
Thontowi , Ahmad. (2009). Hakekat relegiusitas. Makalah
Ttremblay, R.E. (2000). The development of aggressive behaviour during childhood: What have we learned in the past century. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24 (2), 129–141
Wahyudi, R.A. (2013). Hubungan Inferiority Feeling Dan Agresivitas PadaRemaja Delikuen. Skripsi. Jurusan psikologi. Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Unibversitas Negeri Semarang
Widyanta, Arie. (2005). Sikap Terhadap Lingkungan dan Religiusitas. Jurnal Psikologi Vol. 1. No.2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
