UNDERSTANDING INDONESIAN E-LAW AND DEMOCRACY: CHALLENGE, AND HOPE
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas bagaimana firma hukum dengan cepat memberikan nasihat kepada warga yang membutuhkan bantuan hukum di era digital dengan bantuan teknologi, smartphone, laptop, dan komputer untuk mendapatkan keadilan dan demokrasi di Indonesia. Kita membutuhkan data yang kita dapatkan secara elektronik tentang banyak komplikasi seperti prosiding jurnal, buku, dan materi lain yang membahas pemahaman dunia dan perkembangan demokrasi. Data yang kami temukan secara elektronik kemudian dianalisis untuk dipahami dengan melibatkan evaluasi tingkat tinggi dan sistem pengkodean untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian ini dengan prinsip validitas dan reliabilitas yang tinggi. Kami mengambil beberapa publikasi terkenal seperti aplikasi, Taylor dan Francis, buku Google, dan beberapa materi akademik yang kami terima bantuan teknologi. Setelah mendapatkan pemahaman dan diskusi, secara singkat dapat kami sampaikan temuan ini, dan perkembangan demokrasi Indonesia merupakan terobosan yang sangat signifikan di era dimana setiap orang telah dapat menjangkau informasi secara instan melalui teknologinya dengan harapan temuan ini akan menjadi sebuah penemuan baru. solusi dan masukan untuk kajian perkembangan dan perjalanan demokrasi di era digital.
Kata kunci: demokrasi; pemahaman;, perkembangan; tantangan dan keadilan hukum
Abstract
This study aimed to discuss how law firms quickly provide advice to citizens who need legal assistance in the digital era with the help of technology, smartphones, laptops, and computers to get justice and democracy in Indonesia. We need the data we get electronically on many complications such as journal proceedings, books, and other materials that discuss the world's understanding and development of democracy. The data we found electronically were then analyzed to understand involving a high level of evaluation and coding system to answer this research question with high principles of validity and reliability. We took several well-known publications such as application, Taylor and Francis, Google books, and some academic materials that we received technological assistance. After getting an understanding and discussion, we can briefly convey this finding, and the development of Indonesian democracy is a very significant breakthrough in an era where everyone has been able to reach information instantly through their technology with the hope that this finding will be a new solution and input for studies on the development and journey of democracy in the digital era.
Keywords: challenges; democracy; development; legal justice and understanding
Downloads
References
ALL, ON BEHALF OF, OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, LLC EDUTREK, dan CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. “LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, PC,” 2014.
Barton, Benjamin H. “A glass half full look at the changes in the American legal market.” International Review of Law and Economics 38 (2014): 29–42.
Benvenisti, Eyal. “Upholding Democracy Amid the Challenges of New Technology: What Role for the Law of Global Governance?” European Journal of International Law 29, no. 1 (2018): 9–82.
Criado, J. Ignacio, Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan, dan J. Ramon Gil-Garcia. “Government innovation through social media.” Elsevier, 2013.
Cropf, Robert. “The Challenges in Implementing E-Democracy in the United States.” Dalam User Centric E-Government, 3–22. Springer, 2018.
Crouch, Melissa. Law and Religion in Indonesia: Conflict and the courts in West Java. Routledge, 2013.
Cunningham, James A., Matthias Menter, dan Chris Young. “A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 42, no. 4 (2017): 923–56.
Dinovitzer, Ronit, Hugh P. Gunz, dan Sally P. Gunz. “Reconsidering lawyer autonomy: The nexus between firm, lawyer, and client in large commercial practice.” American Business Law Journal 51, no. 3 (2014): 661–719.
Edwards, Matthew, Awais Rashid, dan Paul Rayson. “A systematic survey of online data mining technology intended for law enforcement.” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 48, no. 1 (2015): 1–54.
Fenwick, Mark, dan Erik PM Vermeulen. “The Lawyer of the Future as ‘Transaction Engineer’: Digital Technologies and the Disruption of the Legal Profession.” Dalam Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain, 253–72. Springer, 2019.
Foster, Allan. “Let’s integrate–information services, content, technologies and collaboration: The Business Information Survey 2012.” Business information review 29, no. 1 (2012): 9–28.
Glavinic, Tonei. “Watergate and the" Washington Post:" Questionable Tactics in Service to Democracy.” Inquiries Journal 4, no. 02 (2012).
Goodenough, Oliver, dan Marc Lauritsen. Educating the Digital Lawyer. LexisNexis, 2012.
Granat, R., dan STEPHANIE Kimbro. “The future of virtual law practice.” Haskins, P. The Relevant Lawyer Re-imaging the Future of the Legal Profession. Chicago, ABA Standing Committee on Professionalism Center for Professional Responsibility, 2017.
Ha-Redeye, Omar. “Virtual Offices Provide Promising Opportunities.” Ontario Bar Association TECHxpo (2013), 2013.
Hildebrandt, Mireille, dan Bert-Jaap Koops. “The challenges of ambient law and legal protection in the profiling era.” The Modern Law Review 73, no. 3 (2010): 428–60.
Horowitz, Donald L. Constitutional change and democracy in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Hussain, Wan Mohd Hirwani Wan, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol, dan Noor Inayah Yaakub. “Internet legal service marketing: are Malaysian lawyers getting left behind?” International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry 3, no. 1–2 (2010): 155–64.
Keene, Douglas L., dan Rita R. Handrich. “Values, priorities, and decision-making: Intergenerational law offices, intergenerational juries.” Jury Expert 25 (2013): 23.
Kharlie, Ahmad Tholabi, dan Muhammad Ishar Helmi. “The Role of the law on electronic information and transactions in overcoming challenges of democracy in Indonesia,” 2019.
Kimbro, Stephanie L. “Practicing law without an office address: How the bona fide office requirement affects virtual law practice.” U. Dayton L. Rev. 36 (2010): 1.
Klinkner, Blake. “Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Law Offices Expected to Be Top Technological Trends Impacting the Legal Profession in 2017.” The Wyoming Lawyer, February, 2017.
Leeuw, Frans L., dan Hans Schmeets. Empirical legal research: A guidance book for lawyers, legislators and regulators. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.
Liang, Sitai, James Mele, Yuehong Wu, Rochelle Buffenstein, dan Peter J. Hornsby. “Resistance to experimental tumorigenesis in cells of a long-lived mammal, the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber).” Aging cell 9, no. 4 (2010): 626–35.
Lintang, Loresta Cahyaning, Adriano Martufi, dan J. W. Ouwerker. “The Alternative Concepts of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia: Legal Comparison with Ireland and Canada.” BESTUUR 9, no. 1 (2020): 13–25.
Margolis, Michael, dan Gerson Moreno-Riaño. The prospect of internet democracy. Routledge, 2016.
Moore, Tamara J., Micah S. Stohlmann, Hui Hui Wang, Kristina M. Tank, Aran W. Glancy, dan Gillian H. Roehrig. “Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education.” Dalam Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices, 35–60. Purdue University Press, 2014.
Musofiana, Ida. “Legal Protection For Victims Of Cybercrime In The Digital Era In Strengthening Cyber Democracy In Indonesia Post 2019 General Election.” Dalam The 2nd International Conference And Call Paper, Vol. 1, 2021.
Noveck, Beth Simone. “Five hacks for digital democracy.” Nature News 544, no. 7650 (2017): 287.
Pambudi, Agung, dan Krista Yitawati. “Dinamika dan Tantangan Cyber Law di Indonesia.” Dalam Proceeding of Conference on Law and Social Studies, 2021.
Parthasarathy, Shobita. “Approaching intellectual property scholarship differently: A qualitative research review and agenda.” Science and Public Policy 47, no. 5 (2020): 627–37.
Pender, Joshua P., Gaurav Jha, Duck Hyun Youn, Joshua M. Ziegler, Ilektra Andoni, Eric J. Choi, Adam Heller, dkk. “Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries.” ACS Nano 14, no. 2 (25 Februari 2020): 1243–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b04365.
Prasetyo, Teguh, Rizky PP Karo Karo, Vena Pricilia, dan Natasha Setiadinata. “The Urgency of Law Establishment Regarding Block-Chain Technology in Indonesia Based on the Perspective of Dignified Justice (Keadilan Bermartabat).” UNIFIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (2019): 177–98.
Putra, Dedi. “A modern judicial system in Indonesia: legal breakthrough of e-court and e-legal proceeding.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (2020): 275–97.
Regan Jr, Milton C., dan Palmer T. Heenan. “Supply chains and porous boundaries: the disaggregation of legal services.” Fordham L. Rev. 78 (2009): 2137.
Reid, Melanie. “A Call to Arms: Why and How Lawyers and Law Schools Should Embrace Artificial Intelligence.” U. Tol. L. Rev. 50 (2018): 477.
Richards, Neil, dan Woodrow Hartzog. “The Pathologies of Digital Consent.” Wash. UL Rev. 96 (2018): 1461.
Samborn, Hope Viner. “Virtual Law Offices Are Blooming Everywhere.” Perspectives 20 (2011): 10.
Shirazi, Arezoo, dan Amir H. Behzadan. “Design and assessment of a mobile augmented reality-based information delivery tool for construction and civil engineering curriculum.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 141, no. 3 (2015): 04014012.
Silva, Petrônio CL, Paulo VC Batista, Hélder S. Lima, Marcos A. Alves, Frederico G. Guimarães, dan Rodrigo CP Silva. “COVID-ABS: An agent-based model of COVID-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 139 (2020): 110088.
Spirakis, Grigorios, Christina Spiraki, dan Konstantinos Nikolopoulos. “The impact of electronic government on democracy: e-democracy through e-participation.” Electronic Government, an International Journal 7, no. 1 (2010): 75–88.
Street, Leslie A., dan David R. Hansen. “Who Owns the Law: Why We Must Restore Public Ownership of Legal Publishing.” J. Intell. Prop. L. 26 (2019): 205.
Stuckey, Kent D., dan Robert L. Ellis. Internet and online law. Law Journal Press, 2021.
Sturm, Martina. “Konzepte und Modelle zur wertschätzenden Begleitung mehrsprachiger Kinder im Rahmen der Kindergarten-und Vorschulpädagogik: Das internationale Forschungsprojekt KINDINMI.” R&E-SOURCE, 2019.
Subagyo, Agus. “Implementasi Pancasila Dalam Menangkal Intoleransi, Radikalisme Dan Terorisme.” Jurnal Rontal Keilmuan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 1 (2020): 10–24.
Syarif, Nurrohman. “Sharia and Democracy: Efforts to Synergize the Demands of Faith with the legal System in Indonesia,” 2019.
Terry, Laurel S. “Trends in global and Canadian lawyer regulation.” Sask. L. Rev. 76 (2013): 145.
Tushnet, Rebecca. “‘I’ma lawyer, not an ethnographer, Jim’: Textual Poachers and Fair Use.” The Journal of Fandom Studies 2, no. 1 (2014): 21–30.
Wassom, Brian. Augmented reality law, privacy, and ethics: Law, society, and emerging AR technologies. Syngress, 2014.
Winters, Jeffrey A. “Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia.” Dalam Beyond Oligarchy, 11–34. Cornell University Press, 2014.
Xie, Junfeng, Helen Tang, Tao Huang, F. Richard Yu, Renchao Xie, Jiang Liu, dan Yunjie Liu. “A survey of blockchain technology applied to smart cities: Research issues and challenges.” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 21, no. 3 (2019): 2794–2830.
Authors who publish with DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
