MEMETAKAN TIPOLOGI PEMILIH DKI DALAM PILKADA 2017

Authors

  • Lely Arrianie Dosen Komunikasi Politik universitas Bengkulu Dan Ketua Program Pascasarjana Komunikasi Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta

Abstract

Pilkada 2017 telah digelar, yang menarik pada pilkada serentak tahap dua tersebut adalah bahwa DKI Jakarta menjadi salah satu peserta Pilkada paling banyak disorot media baik lokal, nasional maupun internasional, tidak heran, karena DKI Jakarta menjadi baromoter pemerintahan dari seluruh pemerintahan daerah di seluruh Indonesia.. Perebutan kekuaasaan kepemimpinan di DKI juga menjadi wacana publik yang terus menjadi kajian menarik untuk dilihat dari sudut manapun. Baik bagi para bakal calon yang maju bertarung, tim kampanye , isu dan propaganda politik yang dimainkan oleh para pendukung, maupun oleh para pengelola medis. Pertarungan akhirnya dimenangkan oleh pasangan Anies dan Sandy. Bagaimana tipologi pemilih DKI yang terpetakan dalam Pilkada itu, pertanyaan menarik yang perlu dalam tulisan ini. Kata kunci : Pilkada DKI, Tipologi Pemilih dan Propanda dalam kampanye.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman, R, A., Witt, E, A., Donnellan, M, B., Trzesniewski, K, H., Robins, R, W., Kashy, D, A. (2011). What Does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory Really Measure?, Assessment, 18(1) 67–87

Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440-450.

Chik, W. (2008). Harassment through the Digital Medium A Cross-Jurisdictional Comparative Analysis on the Law on Cyberstalking. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 3 (1), 13-44

Dehue, F., Bolman, C., Vollink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ Experiences and Parental Perception. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11 (2), 217-223, doi : 10.1089/cpb.2007.0008

Fu, K., Chan, C.H., &Ip, P. (2014). Exploring the relationship between cyberbullying and unnatural child death: An ecological study of twenty-four European countries. BMC Pediatrics,14, 195-201

Garcia, D., Andrianson, L., Archer, T., Rosenberg, P. (2015). The Dark Side of the Affective Profiles: Differences and Similarities in Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism. SAGE Open October-December 2015: 1–14.

Goebert, D., Else, I., Matsu, C., Chung-Do, J., & Chang, J.Y. (2011). The impact of cyberbullying on substance use and mental health in a multiethnic sample. Maternal Child Health Journal, 15, 1282-1286.

Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Tay, L., Donnellan, M. B., Harms, P. D., Robins, R. W., & Yan, T. (2015). Gender differences in Narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 261–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038231.

Hinduja, S., Patchin, J. W. (2010). Cyberbullying and Suicide; Cyberbullying ResearchSummary.http://www.cyberbulying.us/cyberbullyingand_suciede_research_fact_sheet.pdf, 2010, retrieved August 20, 2011

Internet World Stats Usage and Population Statistics. (2020). Alphabetical List of Countries. Diakses dari http://www.internetworldstats.com pada tanggal 25 Maret 2020.

Juvonen, J, & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496-505.

Lee, K., Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571-1582.

Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in school; A research of gender differences. School Psychology International. 27. 157-170.

Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in school. Computer in Human Behavior. 23, 1777 – 1791.

Nixon, C, L. (2014). Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143–158

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 336, 556-563.

Ramli, A. (2004). Cyber Law dan HAKI dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Bandung : Rafika Aditama.

Reed, C. (2010). Why Must You Be Mean to Me? Crime and the Online Persona. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 13 (3), 485-514

Safaria, T. (2016). Prevalence and impact of cyberbullying in a sample of Indonesian junior high school students. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15,(1), 82-91.

Safaria, T., Temtama, F., Suyono, H. (2016). Cyberbully, Cybervictim, and Forgiveness among Indonesian High School Students. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15,(3), 40-48.

Schneider, S. K., O’Donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. W. S. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1),171-177.

Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of researchon cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 277–287.

---------------, 2000 Komunikasi Politik : Khalayak dan Efek, Bandung : Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Mc, Nair, Brian, 1995, Introduction to Political Communication, London, Routlrdge

Mc.Quail, Dennis 1996, Teori Komunikasi Massa suatu Pengantar , Jakarta, Erlangga

____________& Sven Windahl 1985, Communication Models for The Study Mass of

Communication, New York. Longman Inc

Downloads

Published

2021-04-09