SISTEM KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH DALAM KOMPLEKSITAS POKTAN FIKTIF PENGEMBANGAN KAMBING KALIGESING DI PURWOREJO
Abstract
Government development system encouraged environment complexity like fictif farmers group. Those farmer groups existance when giving of Kaligesing goat from government. The aim of the research is to know how government communication system adapted in complexity of fictif farmer groups in Kaligesing goat farmings in Purworejo regency. Theory that had used is communication system in Niklas Luhmann perspective.Research methods that had used is conducted explorative case study.Population of the research in Purworejo regency which was the center of Kaligesing goat farming.The result of this research shown that government communication system was produced information about giving letter of decision from village heads for farmer groups which have activity in farmings. Government communication system was reproduced information about classification of farmer groups by subdistrict extension center and legacy of farmer groups. But those producing and reproducing of information wasn’t solved complexity effective because two factors. First, government communication system less interrelated with its sub systems. Second, government communication system less interrelated with others systems, especially political system.
Keywords: government communication system, adaptation, complexity, fictif farmer groups, farmings of Kaligesing goat.
Abstrak Sistem komunikasi Pemerintah menghadapi kompleksitas lingkungan berupa poktan fiktif. Poktan ini sering muncul ketika pemberian bantuan kambing Kaligesing oleh Pemerintah. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana sistem komunikasi Pemerintah beradaptasi dalam kompleksitas poktan fiktif pengembangan kambing Kaligesing di kabupaten Purworejo. Teori yang digunakan adalah sistem komunikasi dalam perspektif Niklas Luhmann. Metode penelitian adalah studi kasus eksploratif. Populasi penelitian di kabupaten Purworejo yang menjadi sentra pengembangan kambing Kaligesing. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem komunikasi Pemerintah sudah memroduksi informasi berupa pemberian Surat Keputusan Kepala Desa (SK Kades) untuk kelompok tani (poktan) yang aktif berkegiatan. Sistem juga mereproduksi informasi berupa pendataan poktan aktif oleh BPK dan kewajiban berbadan hukum. Namun produksi dan reproduksi ini tidak efektif menyelesaikan kompleksitas karena dua hal. Pertama, sistem kurang berinterrelasi dengan sub sistemnya. Kedua, sistem lemah dalam berinterrelasi dengan sistem diluar dirinya, terutama sistem politik. Kata
kunci:sistem komunikasi Pemerintah, adaptasi, kompleksitas, poktan fiktif, pengembangan kambing Kaligesing
Downloads
References
Albert, Mathias &LenaHilkermeier (ed).(2004).Observing International Relations: Niklas
Luhmann and World Politics. New York: Routledge.
Daymon, Christine &Immy Holloway.(2005).Qualitative Research Methods in Public
Relations and Marketing Communications. New York: Routledge.
Fuchs, Stephan. (1999).Niklas Luhmann.Journal of Sociological Theory. Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.
-119. American Sociological Association.
Hagen, Roar.(2000). Observing Luhmann.Acta Sociologica. Vol. 43. No. 1, pp. 3-4. SAGE
Publications Ltd.601
Handaka, Tatag. (2014). Struktur Adaptif (Adaptive Structure) dalam Sistem Komunikasi
Budidaya Kambing Peranakan Etawa (PE) di Kabupaten Purworejo. Prosiding
Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Peternakan Indonesia Berbasis Riset Inovatif.
Program Studi Peternakan. Fakultas Pertanian UNS. Hal. 243-246.
Handaka, Tatag. (2015). Relasi Kuasa dan Sistem Komunikasi Pemerintah dalam Budidaya
Kambing Peranakan Ettawa (PE) Kaligesing di Kabupaten Purworejo. Prosiding
Peran dan Kontribusi Kajian Komunikasi dalam Era Komunitas ASEAN. Fakultas
Ilmu Komunikasi UMN. Hal. 280-305.
Handaka, Tatag, Hermin Indah Wahyuni, Endang Sulastri, Paulus Wiryono. (2016).
Kompleksitas New Media dalam Budidaya Kambing Peranakan Ettawa (PE) di
Kabupaten Purworejo. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penyuluhan dan Komunikasi
Pembangunan. Program Studi Penyuluhan dan Komunikasi Pembangunan. Sekolah
Pascasarjana UGM. Hal. 467-475.
Hardiman, F. Budi. (2008).Teori Sistem Niklas Luhmann.Jurnal Filsafat Driyarkara. Th.
XXIX No. 3. Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat (STF) Driyarkara.
Hartley, Jean.(2004). Case Study Research, in Cassell, Catherine &Gillian Symon.Essential
Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: SAGE
Publications Ltd.
Jupp, Victor (2006).The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London: SAGE
Publications Ltd.
King, Michael &Chris Thornhill.(2003).Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law. New
York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, Daniel.(2000). The Society of Society: The Grand Finale of Niklas Luhmann.Journal of
Sociological Theory.No. 18. American Sociological Association, USA.
Leydesdorff, Loet.(2000).Luhmann, Habermas, and the Theory of Communication.Journal of
Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Vol. 17, No. 3, p.273-288.
Luhmann, Niklas.(1995).Social Systems. Translated by John Bednarz, Jr. with Dirk Baecker.
Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas.(2000).The Reality of the Mass Media. Translated by Kathleen Cross.
California: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas.(2000).Art as A Social System. Translated by Eva M. Knodt. Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas.(1986).Love as Passion: the Codification of Intimacy. Translated by Jeremy
Gaines and Doris L. Jones. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas.(2002).Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Description of Modernity.
Translated by Joseph O’Neil [et al.]. California: Stanford University.
Neergard, Helle & John Parm Ulhoi(ed.).(2007).Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods
in Entrepreneurship. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Patton, Michael Quinn.(2002).Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd Edition.
California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Ritzer, George.(2012).Sociological Theory. 8th Edition. Dialihbahasakan oleh Saut Pasaribu
dkk. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Stake, Robert E.(2005). Qualitative Case Studies, in Denzin, Norman K., &Yvonna S.
Lincoln (eds).The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd Edition. California:
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Stark, Sheila &Harry Torrance.(2005). Case Study, in Somekh, Bridget &Cathy
Lewin.Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Viskovatoff, Alex.(1999). Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Social
Systems.Journal of Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 481-516
