Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga
Abstract
This study aims to find out and understand the judge's considerations, which is one aspect that is crucial in determining the realization of the value of a judge's decision that gives a sense of justice (ex aequo et bono). From legal considerations that are considered prismatically, it will produce values of legal certainty, justice, and benefits simultaneously. This research is a normative legal research conducted by examining laws and regulations, books, and journals related to the writing theme. Based on the results of the research, it was concluded that the criminal responsibility of perpetrators of domestic violence based on court decisions consists of 2 components, namely juridical considerations, namely judgments made by judges based on judicial facts that were revealed at trials determined by law and required to be included in decisions and non-juridical considerations based on legal provisions and a sense of social justice. As for implementing restorative justice in domestic violence cases, it is applied as a consideration to protect family coherence, especially in fortifying children's futures. Humans think the best way to help victims of crime is to catch the criminals. By paying attention to the Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence and the Criminal Procedure Code, the results of court decisions relating to crimes of domestic violence consider the concept of punishment based on restorative justice which is oriented towards recovery efforts and the interests of the perpetrator and the victim of the crime carried out through 5 methods, namely the sufferer culprit mediation, own family organization conferencing, restorative conferencing, community restorative forums, and restorative circles or restorative
Downloads
References
Adriyanti, E. F. (2021). Urgensitas Implementasi Restorative Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Education and Development . Vol.8 No. 4 , 326.
Angrayni, L. (2016). Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan Perspektif Restorative Justice. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, Vol. 16 No. 1, 91.
Chazawi, A. (2021). Kejahatan Terhadap Tubuh & Nyawa. PT .Raja Grafindo.
Darmoko Yuti Witanto, A. P. (2013). Diskresi Hakim Sebuah Instrumen Menegakkan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Perkara-Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Djamali, R. (2003). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia” , Cetakan Ke Sembilan. Jakarta: PT.RajaGrafindo Persada.
Elsa Rina Maya, H. Z. (2021). Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan Pada Masa Pandemi Covid Virus Disaese (COVID-19). jurnal ilmu hukum, 273.
Farida, N. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Penellitian Pendidikan Bahasa . Solo: Cakra Books.
Firmansyah, A. (2022). “Peran Lembaga Assesment Terpadu Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Melalui Pendekeatan Restorative Justice. IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 66-78.
Gurusi, L. (2017). “Tinjauan Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kelalaian Lalu Lintas Yang Menyebabkan Hilangnya Nyawa Orang (Studi Kasus No. 154/PID.B2015/PN.PW. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Pendidikan Indonesia 1, no. 2 , 5.
Hambali, A. R. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana. Kalabbirang Law Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, 71.
Hamzah, A. (1984). Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. Penerbit Chalia Indonesia
Hana Nelsri Kaban, D. (2022). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (STUDI PUTUSAN NO.1972/PID.SUS/2018/PN.MDN). Jurnal Retentum, 3(1).
Harahap, S. &. (2017). Gagasan Pengatu Ran Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Dengan Berorientasi Pada Korban. Jurnal Yuridis. Vol. 1, No. 2, 93 -108.
Karim, L. O. (2018). Analisa Hukum Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 16/Pid.Sus-Anak/2015/PN.Bau Terhadap Tindak Pidana Membawa Atau Memiliki Senjata Tajam Oleh Anak. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 3, no. 2 , 64.
Lili rasyidi, i. r. (1983). pengantar filsafat dan teori hukum . bandung: citra aditya bakti.
Lizda, L. F. (2010). The Role of Restorative Justice in the Batterered Women's Movement”, in Restorative Justice And Violence Against Women Edited by James Ptacek. Oxford University Press. London: Oxford University Press.
Lorenza, A. (2021). Putusan Hakim Yang Mengesampingkan Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Anak Berhadapan Dengan Hukum. 2.
Mahsun, L. (2020). PENGARUH PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM YANG MENGADILI PEREMPUAN SEBAGAI PELAKU KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 180 Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Smn.). Caraka Justitia, 1(1).
Mansyur, R. (2010). “Mediasi Penal Terhdap Perkara KDRT (Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga). Jakarta: Yayasan Gema Yuditia Indonesia.
Marbun, R. (2015). “Membangun Restorative Justice Dan Penal Mediation Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press.
Mertokusumo, S. (2016). Teori hukum. Yogyakarta: cahaya atma pustaka.
Miharja, M. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. (CV. Penerbit Qiara Media.
Mulyadi, L. (2007). Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Teoritis Dan Prakter Pradilan. Mandar maju .
Mustofa, M. (2021). Mengaktualisasikan Gagasan Restorative Justice Di Indonesia.
Nainggolan, P. D. (2020). Penerapan Resyorative justice terhadap pencurian buah kelapa sawit oleh anak di bawah umur (studi kasus di PTPN IV Unit Air Batu). Juncto jurnal imliah hukum .
Pratidina, A. N. (2019). “Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Pencurian Buah Kelapa Sawit Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur (Studi Kasus PTPN IV UnIt Air Batu) . SKRIPSI, 1.
Rabbani, A. (2020). Penyelesaian tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dalam perspektif Restorative Justice. Jurnal Hukum Al Adl.
Rokamah, R. (2013). Restorative Justice Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Anak Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif. Justicia Islamica, 268-269.
Salim, R. D. (1956). Hukum Pidana Khusus. Depok: PT.Raja Grafindo.
Samosir, D. (1992). Fungsi Pidana Penjara Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Indonesia. Bandung: Binacipta.
Satria, H. (2018). Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana. urnal Media Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 , 113.
Sartika, E. (2023). TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH SUAMI TERHADAP ISTRI (Analisis Putusan Hakim No. 36/Pid. us/2021/PN Ttn). Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry.
Sianturi, E. &. (2002). Asas Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Storia Grafika.
Soesilo, G. B. (2021). Criminal Policy Dan Re Storative Justice Sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Terjadinya Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. mnesti Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 2, 94.
Suratman, P. D. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Alfabeta.
Syarifuddin, ". F. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Abstract Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (Studi Penelitian Pada Polrestabes Medan). Jurnal Hukum Kaidah Media Komunikasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 193.
Tajuddin, M. J. (2020). Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Pendampingan Anak Asli Papua Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Jatiswara. Vol. 35 No. 1, 66.
Authors who publish with Mimbar Keadilan agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
