President Elections Mechanism: Comparative Studies from Indonesia, Russia, and Türkiye
Abstract
This study aims to determine the differences and similarities in the presidential election system in 3 (three) countries, as an example we choose Indonesia, Russia, and Türkiye. This research focuses on how the presidential election system is implemented in the countries of Indonesia, Russia, and Türkiye as well as, what are the differences in the presidential election system used, the pattern of nominations, and the requirements for presidential nominations by the countries of Indonesia, Russia, and Türkiye. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a comparative approach based on the constitution of each country. The results of the study show that there are similarities and differences in the presidential elections in the three countries. First, the similarity of the three countries is implementing a plural or district system with the Two Round System variant. The winner of the election must get absolute or absolute votes. Second, the differences between the three countries in presidential elections such as nomination patterns, terms of office, presidential requirements, and thresholds. However, in analyzing this difference, there are only two countries that are the same: Indonesia and Türkiye, for the same presidential term. Then the nomination pattern in Russia and Türkiye is the same. Then, the age requirements for Indonesian and Türkiye presidential candidates are the same
Downloads
References
Adjie Hari Setiawan. 2023. ‘Politik Hukum Presidential Threshold 20% Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017’, JAPHTN-HAN, 2.1 (Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi) <https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.64>
Andryan, S.H., MH. 2020. Lembaga Kepresidenan Sejarah Dan Dinamika Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia
Azhar, Ikhsan. 2018. ‘Manajemen Hakim (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia Dengan Turki)’, Mulawarman Law Review, 3.32: 48–65 <https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v3i1.33>
Clark, William A, and A Clark. 2015. ‘Presidential under and Democratic Constitution : Stability the Russian Analysis’, 28.3: 620–37
Emerson, Peter. 2020. ‘Parliamentary and Presidential Elections’, Majority Voting as a Catalyst of Populism: 31–52 <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20219-4_2>
Faiz, Pan Mohamad, and Muhammad Erfa Redhani. 2018. ‘Analisis Perbandingan Peran Kamar Kedua Parlemen Dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Proses Pemberhentian Presiden’, Jurnal Konstitusi, 15.2: 231 <https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1521>
Fajrian, M, and K Kurniawan. 2021. ‘Perbandingan Pemilihan Umum Presiden Dalam Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia Dan Republik Turki’, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum …, 5.1: 18–25 <http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/kenegaraan/article/view/18694>
Fikri, Sultoni, Idzhati Fitri Nabilah, Ika Sistia Wulan Sari, and Tio Fernida Siregar. 2022. ‘Perbandingan Pemilihan Umum Presiden Di Indonesia Dengan Korea Selatan’, Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14.1: 78 <https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i1.309>
Hariansah, Syafri, Anna Erliyana, Sekolah Tinggi, Ilmu Hukum Pertiba, Jalan Adiyaksa, and others. 2018. MEKANISME PENGISIAN JABATAN KEKOSONGAN JABATAN PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN; STUDI PERBANDINGAN DENGAN AMERIKA SERIKAT, BRAZIL DAN PERANCIS, Pakuan Law Review, IV
Heper, Metin, and Menderes Cinar. 1996. ‘Parliamentary Government with a Strong President: The Post-1989 Turkish Experience’, Political Science Quarterly, 111.3: 483 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2151972>
Al Hidayat, Nanang. 2018. ‘Pemilihan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Langsung Dalam Demokrasi Pancasila Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 3.1: 1–7 <https://doi.org/10.24269/jpk.v3.n1.2018.pp1-7>
KE, Molaba. 2016. ‘No Title مقياس مقترح لتقييم جودة’, مقياس مقترح لتقييم جودة’, جلة الإداري، معهد الإدارة العامة، سلطنة عمان، مسقط:, 147.March: 11–40
Malang, Universitas Muhammadiyah. 2022. ‘PERBANDINGAN KONSTITUSI NEGARA INDONESIA DAN RUSIA Ilham Dwi Rafiqi’, Widya Yuridika, 5.1: 1–14
Nadir, Win Yuli Wardani, and Agustri Purwandi. 2022. ‘Urgensi Pendidikan Politik Menyongsong Pemilihan Umum Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2024 Untuk Menciptakan Pemilihan Umum Yang Jujur Dan Adil’, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4.6: 1349–58
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe/Parliamentary Assembly. 2018. ‘Republic of Turkey – Early Presidential and Parliamentary Elections – 24 June 2018’, International Election Observation Mission
Penelitian, Pusat, and Bidang Ekonomi. 2019. ‘Menyingkap Tudingan Intervensi Rusia Dalam Pilpres Di Amerika Serikat Dan Indonesia Elections and Foreign Interventions : Dislosing the Alleged Russia ’ S Intervensions in Presidential Elections in the United States and Indonesia’, Jurnal Kajian, 24.1: 1–14
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2016. Penelitian Hukum
Qoroni, Waisol, and Indien Winarwati. 2021. ‘Kedaulatan Rakyat Dalam Konteks Demokrasi Di Indonesia’, Inicio Legis, 2.1: 51–65 <https://doi.org/10.21107/il.v2i1.11079>
Review, T H E Eu-russia Centre. 2011. ‘THE EU-RUSSIA CENTRE REVIEW The Electoral System of the Russian Federation Issue Seventeen’, Foreign Affairs, 2011.17: 47
Roffi, Huria Rifdah. 2018. ‘Sistem Pemilihan President Di Indonesia’, Parapolitika, 3.4: 5
Rohma, Elva Imeldatur. 2019. ‘PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN, IRAN, DAN PERANCIS’, Jurnal Ummul Qura , XIII.1: 117–34
Schmidt, Gerlind. 2015. ‘Russian Federation’, The Education Systems of Europe, Second Edition: 679–706 <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07473-3_40>
Sumodiningrat, Aprilian. 2021. ‘Meninjau Ulang Ketentuan Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 1.1: 49 <https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v1i1.23349>
Tamrin, Abu. 2013. ‘Urgensi Pemilu Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Secara Langsung Di Era Reformasi’, Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1.2 <https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.2990>
Tosun, Gülgün Erdoğan. 2016. Reconsidering the Presidential System in Turkey, XVIII <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26300456?seq=1&cid=pdf->
Triwahyuningsih, Susani. 2019. ‘Sistem Demokrasi Dalam Pemilihan Umum Secara Langsung Di Indonesia’, Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3.2: 62 <https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v3i2.2023>
Authors who publish with Mimbar Keadilan agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
