ANALISIS ALTERNATIF DESAIN BANGUNAN JEMBATAN DENGAN VALUE ENGINEERING

Authors

  • M. Hasan Busri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/exp.v7i01.955

Abstract

Planning or design phase of the bridge construction project is often not optimal, which affects the amount of waste and unnecessary costs of the construction phase of the bridge so that the application of Value Engineering efforts could be a solution to optimize the value of the benefits while reducing costs unnecessary.  Besides, designs and models of various bridge today requires us to be able to choose a model which bridges the most suitable and appropriate to the local natural conditions. This study was conducted to determine the structure of the bridge what is the most economical but still complied with the required strength. The bridge was built with spans of 40 m and a width of 7 m is equipped with 2 (two) sidewalk on the right and left. In this study, the analysis will be conducted on three types of bridges, namely precast bridge, bridge and bridge betonkonvensional steel frame. The method used is a value engineering analysis of the four models that will bridge over the pre-cast bridge, bridge frame of steel and conventional concrete bridge. In the value engineering method (value engineering), there are several steps that must be done is the information phase, the analysis phase function, the creative stage and phase of development.  The results showed that of the three (3) alternative bridge is a conventional concrete bridge, precast concrete bridge, and the bridge framework. Obtained by a conventional concrete bridge structures bridge the most economical, while for bridge steel frame and precast concrete bridge as an alternative.

Keywords: Value Engineering, Bridge Building Structure, cost efficiency

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Halim, Abdul, 2002. Analisis Investasi,

Penerbit Salemba Empat, Jakarta

Kota Makassar, 2009. Pemerintah, Rencana

Teknik Ruang Kota, Dinas Cipta

Karya dan Tata Kota, Makassar

Pujawan, I Nyoman, 1995. Ekonomi Teknik,

PT Guna Widya, Jakarta

-955,3 jt

329,5 jt

tahun

tahun

n=?

Jurnal Teknik Sipil Untag Surabaya 94

Extrapolasi Jurnal Teknik Sipil Untag Surabaya

Juni 2012, Vol. 05, No. 01, hal 80 - 95

Setionegoro, Wijoyo, 2008. Pengembalian

Investasi Pada Pembangunan

Gedung Futsal Centre, JTS ITS,

Surabaya

Suwarno, Suad, 2000. Studi Kelayakan

Proyek, Edisi Keempat, UPP AMP

YKPN, Yogyakarta

www.makassarkota.go.id

www.marketivaasia.com/definisi-danpengertian-investasi

www.semuabisnis.com/articles/53/1/3-ResikoInvestasi

Yacob Ibrahim, 2003. Studi Kelayakan Bisnis,

Edisi Revisi, Penerbit Rineka Cipta,

Jakarta

Downloads

Published

2014-07-10

Issue

Section

Articles