The Ideal Concept of Requirements for Ad Hoc Human Rights Judges at the Supreme Court to Achieve Justice
Abstract
Resolving severe human rights abuses in Indonesia requires serious efforts. One significant case, the human rights abuses in Paniai, remains unresolved and has not yet found justice. After the accused was acquitted, the Attorney General filed an appeal to the Supreme Court. However, the cassation process has not proceeded due to the absence of ad hoc human rights judges at the Supreme Court. The stringent requirements for ad hoc judges at the Supreme Court level serve as a barrier to attracting competent candidates. This study employs normative legal research methodology, utilizing both legislative and case approaches. The findings indicate that there is a need to amend the administrative requirements outlined in Paragraph 4, clauses (d) and (e), which pertain to the age and experience of prospective ad hoc judges. These requirements hinder qualified candidates, particularly those with expertise in severe human rights abuses, from applying. The inefficiency and ineffectiveness of these administrative criteria contribute to delays in resolving such cases. The study advocates for revising the age and experience requirements, emphasizing that the critical factor in resolving severe human rights abuses is the ad hoc judges' knowledge of victim rehabilitation and the imposition of appropriate penalties on perpetrators. Revising these requirements is essential to expedite the resolution of severe human rights abuses and to ensure a more effective judicial process.
Downloads
References
Ahmad Samawi. Pendidikan Hak Asasi Manusia. Edited by Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta, 2018.
Arifin, Andi. “Peran Hakim Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Law Research 1, no. 1 (2023):
Ashri, Muhammad. Hak Asasi Manusia:Filosofi, Teori Dan Instrumen Dasar. Edited by Cv. Social Politic Genius. Makasar, 2018.
Bone, Sholihin. “Penataan Kewenangan Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia: Telaah Sistem Hukum.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum AMANNA GAPPA 29, no. 1 (2021):
Diajeng Wulan Christianty, Ifdhal Kasim, Trihoni Nalesti Dewi. Pengadilan Pura-Pura: Eksminasi Publik Atas Putusan Pengadilan HAM Kasus Abepura. Jakarta: ELSAM, 2007.
Fatma Faisal. “Eksistensi Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan.” Gorontalo Law Reviewer Vol. 2, no. 1 (2019):
Handayani, S, M R Lubis, D Sintara, and ... “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Mekanisme Upaya Hukum Kasasi Perkara Pidana Anak Di Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Pakam (Studi Kasus Putusan ….” Neraca Keadilan 1, no. 2 (2023): https://puskapad.co.id/index.php/mp/article/view/38%0Ahttps://puskapad.co.id/index.php/mp/article/download/38/38.
Hasril Hertatno. “Eksistensi Hakim Ad Hoc Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Sebagai Upaya Menumbuhkan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Pada Lembaga Pengadilan.” Universitas Indonesia, 2008.
Hidayat, Eko. “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia.” Asas: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 2 (2016): 80–87. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/asas/article/view/1249.
Huda, Muhammad Miftakhul. “Implementasi Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Pelanggaran HAM Berat Paniai Prespektif Teori Efektivitas Hukum Soerjono Soekanto.” Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol. 11, no. No. 1 (2022): Hlm 118.
Khaidar Rohman, Sutrisno, Zaidah Nur Rosidah, Fairuz Sabiq. “Implementasi Perma Nomor 5 Tahun 2016 Tentang Sertifikasi Hakim Ekonomi Syariah Terhadap Penanganan Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama Sukoharjo.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 5, no. 1 (2023): 34–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/el-iqthisady.vi.35621.
Kumbul Kusdwidjanto Sudjasi dan Yusuf Setyadi. “Problematika Proses Peradilan Perkara Pelanggaran HAM Di Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic And Law Studies Vol. 6, no. No. 1 (2022): Hlm. 52.
Kurnianto, Jodhy. “Potert Suram Terhadap Penanganan Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Paniai.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kota Ramah Hak Asasi Manusia 3, no. 3 (2023):
M. Nur Sholikin. “Penataan Untuk Menjalankan Reformasi Regulasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pasar Modal VIII (2018):
M. Yahya Harahap. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Edisi Ke Dua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Majda El Muthaj. Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia Dari UUD 1945 Sampai Dengan Amandemen UUD 1945 Tahun 2002. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2005.
Oemar Senin Adji. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1981.
Prihastuti, Dina. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pemeriksaan Persidangan Biasa Dengan Hakim Berjumlah Genap.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganeraan 2, no. 1 (2024):
Ridwan, Moch. “Pendekatan Sistem Dalam Penyelesaian Upaya Kasasi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 15, no. 2 (2021): https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.v15.305-326.
Rosiwati, Dian. Seri Bahan Bacaan Kursus HAM Untuk Pengacara XI Tahun 2007. Jakarta: ELSAM, 2007.
Sadli Sabir, Muh. “Analisis Perbandingan Kewenangan Executive Review Dan Judicial Review Terhadap Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 3, no. 1 (2023):
Santoso, Gunawan. “Kajian Penegak Hukum Di Indonesia Untuk Membentuk Perdamaian Dalam Bhineka Tunggal Ika Indonesia Abad 21.” Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif 2, no. 1 (2023):
Sardari, Ahmad Asif, and Ja’far Shodiq. “Peradilan Dan Pengadilan Dalam Konsep Dasar, Perbedaan Dan Dasar Hukum.” JIFLAW : Journal Of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 1 (2022):
Suparman Marzuki. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: PUSHAM UII, 2017.
Ticoalu, Novita Maria. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Transparansi Pemerintah Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia.” Lex Administratum XI, no. 04 (2023):
Widjaja. “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Studi Kasus: Putusan PN MAKASSAR Nomor.1/Pid.Sus-AM/2022/PN.Mks.” Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara 1, no. 2 (2024):
Wilde, Aisya Avrylia Elskan. “Kelemahan Penanganan Pelanggaran Tindak PIdana Pemilihan Umum Di Negara Republik Indonesia.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 4 (2024):
Yustina Trihoni Nalesti Dewi. “Hak Konstitusional Korban Atas Pengadilan HAM Yang Kompeten, Independen Dan Imparsial.” Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 2, no. 1 (2014):
Authors who publish with Mimbar Keadilan agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
