Deconstructing the Criminal Justice System in Nepal: Toward a Victim-Centered Justice Paradigm within the Shadows of a Hybrid Legal System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v19i1.13160Keywords:
criminal justice system, legal reform, human rights, victim-centered justiceAbstract
Nepal’s criminal justice system, despite undergoing legislative reforms, remains entangled in a historical legacy rooted in hierarchical social structures and patriarchal values. This legal system, marked by minimal implementation of justice principles, has yet to realize a truly participatory and victim-centered model of justice. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which legal reforms in Nepal have ensured more equitable and victim-oriented justice, and how legal transformation within the criminal justice system can be actualized. Through a critical examination of Nepal’s legal history, constitutional texts, and legislative reform initiatives, this article assesses the dissonance between progressive legal theories and practical implementation. Employing a normative-juridical approach with an emphasis on critical legal analysis and a comparative-historical perspective, the study reveals that, despite legislative efforts to reduce inequality and discrimination, law enforcement practices continue to reflect structural disparities that neglect the needs of victims and reinforce state dominance in criminal proceedings. Accordingly, current reforms remain insufficient to achieve substantive change and necessitate an ideological transformation toward a legal paradigm that is more responsive and sensitive to victims’ rights.
Downloads
References
Acharya, Suman. “Historical Compartment of Nepalese Legal System.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3835576.
Armstrong, Gail. “Females under the Law— ‘Protected’ but Unequal.” Crime & Delinquency 23, no. 2 (April 4, 1977): 109–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112877702300202.
Aruan, Thommy. “Restorative Justice in Criminal Law Enforcement from a Legal Perspective as a Social Engineering Tool.” Journal of Community Development in Asia 7, no. 1 (January 20, 2024): 67–69. https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v7i1.2698.
Bhattarai, Achyutananda. “Translating Muluki Ain of 1854 for Intercultural Communication in Law.” JODEM: Journal of Language and Literature 15, no. 1 (August 22, 2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3126/jodem.v15i1.68908.
Bhattarai, Lokindra Hari. “Critical Appraisal of Governance and Justice: Then and Now in Nepal.” Molung Educational Frontier 8 (December 3, 2018): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.3126/mef.v8i0.22442.
Davis, Donald R. “Hinduism as a Legal Tradition.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 75, no. 2 (June 1, 2007): 241–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfm004.
Dearing, Albin, and Holly Huxtable. “Doing Justice for Victims of Violent Crime in the European Union - Reflections on Findings from a Research Project Conducted by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 45, no. 1 (January 2, 2021): 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2020.1762233.
Friedman, Barry. “Taking Law Seriously.” Perspectives on Politics 4, no. 02 (June 18, 2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060178.
Giri, Saroj Kumar. “The Rule of Law Under the Constitution of Nepal.” Gyanjyoti 3, no. 1 (March 7, 2023): 74–84. https://doi.org/10.3126/gyanjyoti.v3i1.53038.
Guragain, Govinda Prasad, Dol Raj Kafle, Sabita Kumari Mallik, and Bhawani Shankar Adhikari. “Human Rights in Nepal’s Democracy: Achieving Best Practices.” European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences 2, no. 4 (July 1, 2024): 237–47. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(4).20.
Hawkesworth, Mary. “Political Life and the Law.” In The Routledge Global History of Feminism, 303–19. London: Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050049-25.
Khadka, Bijaya. “Rights of Crime Victim under the Prevailing Laws of Nepal.” Shanti Journal 4, no. 1 (October 10, 2024): 109–28. https://doi.org/10.3126/shantij.v4i1.70560.
Lariviere, Richard W. “Justices and Paṇḍitas: Some Ironies in Contemporary Readings of the Hindu Legal Past.” The Journal of Asian Studies 48, no. 4 (November 23, 1989): 757–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2058113.
Lee, Jusil. “Why Have Policies Often Remained Symbolic? Understanding the Reasons for Decoupling between Policy and Practice.” Review of Policy Research 34, no. 5 (September 30, 2017): 617–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12241.
Lorinskas, Robert, David Kalinich, and Dennis Banas. “Symbolism and Rhetoric: The Guardians of Status Quo in the Criminal Justice System.” Criminal Justice Review 10, no. 1 (May 1, 1985): 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401688501000106.
Messerschmidt, Donald A. “The Caste Hierarchy and the State in Nepal: A Study of the Muluki Ain in 1854.” The Journal of Asian Studies 40, no. 4 (August 23, 1981): 824–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2055725.
Nemec, John. “Hindu Law and Society.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 140, no. 1 (September 19, 2021): 205–17. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.1.0205.
Pokharel, Prabhas. “The Caste Hierarchy and the State in Nepal.” Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 14 (December 30, 2020): 139–42. https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v14i0.31030.
Robins, S. “Towards Victim-Centred Transitional Justice: Understanding the Needs of Families of the Disappeared in Postconflict Nepal.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 5, no. 1 (March 1, 2011): 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijq027.
Singh, Rajendra Bahadur. “The ‘Criminalized’ Human Conducts in (Nepal) Country Penal (Code), Act 2017: A Critical Research Analysis.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3481013.
Skolnik, Terry. “Criminal Justice Reform: A Transformative Agenda.” Alberta Law Review 59, no. 3 (March 22, 2022): 631–68. https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2689.
Szablowinski, Zenon. “Punitive Justice and Restorative Justice Ss Social Reconciliation.” The Heythrop Journal 49, no. 3 (May 15, 2008): 405–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2007.00373.x.
Tomlins, Christopher. “How Autonomous Is Law?” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3, no. 1 (December 1, 2007): 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112741.
United Nations Nepal. “Literature Review on Harmful Practices in Nepal.” nepal.unfpa.org, January 2020. https://nepal.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Literature%20Review%20on%20Harmful%20Practices%20in%20Nepal.pdf.
Urscheler, Lukas Heckendorn. “Innovation in a Hybrid System: The Example of Nepal.” European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance 15, no. 3 (2013): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-45060009.
Wahl, Rachel. “Justice, Context, and Violence: Law Enforcement Officers on Why They Torture.” Law & Society Review 48, no. 4 (December 1, 2014): 807–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12108.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bimal Prasad Lamicchane, Kabita Dahal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mimbar Keadilan agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)








