Legal Analysis of Appointment of Former Corruption Concvicts As Commissioner Of BUMN
This study aims to clearly describe the regulation on the appointment of former corruption convicts as commissioners in BUMN and provides an understanding of the legal implications that can occur in the appointment of corruption convicts in BUMN. theoretically this writing is built with a legal perspective on the appointment of former corruption convicts as commissioners of BUMN and is supported by the Theory of Authority, and Review of the principles of good governance. All arguments, facts, and theoretical frameworks in this study are expressed using empirical normative legal research methods. Data obtained and collected through books, journals, papers and papers. Finally, the results of interviews and articles related to the problem. The research method of this case combines elements of normative law which is then added with data or empirical elements. This research is a qualitative research with analytical descriptive nature. The results of this study, namely where the appointment of former corruption convicts as the board of commissioners in a subsidiary of a BUMN has been in accordance with applicable regulations. However, according to Law No. 19 of 2003 article 28 paragraph (1), it is stated that members of the Board of Commissioners are appointed based on integrity considerations, in this case the author assumes that there is a legal loophole that can be used as a legal basis for the appointment of the board of commissioners in BUMN. The integrity requirement as a material requirement is only used as a supporting requirement for the appointment of a commissioner. Meanwhile, integrity is an important requirement that must be carefully considered by the deputy as an assessor of the prospective commissioner to be appointed. Integrity greatly affects the sustainability and application of good corporate governance principles in the scope of SOEs. Fulfillment of integrity is a requirement and element of assessment in which integrity concerns the track record of the prospective commissioner concerned.
Abdulkadir, Muhammad. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Adrian Sutedi, S H. Buku Pintar Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: PT Niaga Swadaya, 2015.
Ansari, Muhammad Insa. “Badan Usaha Milik Negara dan Kewajiban Pelayanan Umum pada Sektor Pos.” Jurnal Penelitian Pos dan Informatika 8, no. 1 (2018): 1–20.
Atmosudirdjo, Prajudi. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 1981.
Busyra, Azheri. Corporate Social Responsibility: Dari Voluntary Menjadi Mandatory. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2011.
Hadi, Zarman. Karakteristik Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Pemegang Saham Komisaris dan Direksi dalam Perseroan Terbatas. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2011.
Ilmar, Aminuddin. Hak Menguasai Negara dalam Privatisasi BUMN. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012.
Kansil, Christine S T. Pokok-Pokok Pengetahuan Hukum Dagang. Jakarta: Sinar Baru, 2017.
Khairandy, Ridwan. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2013.
Kurniawan. Hukum Perusahaan. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2014.
Mahardika, Ahmad Gelora. “Rekonstruksi Syarat Pengangkatan Jabatan Komisaris BUMN: Antara Idealita dan Realita.” Majalah Hukum Nasional 50, no. 1 (2020): 45–59.
Mulhadi. Hukum Perusahaan Asuransi di Indonesia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2010.
Nugroho, Afrizal Rachmat, S Deasy, dan M M Mercy. “Pengawasan Komisaris Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Persero terhadap Direksi dalam Rangka Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” LEX ADMINISTRATUM 9, no. 1 (2021).
Pangestu, M. Teguh, dan Nurul Aulia. “Hukum Perseroan Terbatas dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia.” Business Law Review 1, no. 3 (2017).
Pratiwi, Risanti Suci. “Legalitas Rangkap Jabatan Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara yang Berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas.” Lex Renaissance 4, no. 2 (2019): 266–284.
Purbopranoto, Koentjoro. Beberapa Catatan Hukum Tata Pemerintaan dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Bandung: Alumni, 1978.
Rahadiyan, Inda. “Kedudukan BUMN Persero sebagai Separate Legal Entity dalam Kaitannya dengan Pemisahan Keuangan Negara pada Permodalan BUMN.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 20, no. 4 (2013): 624–640.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Kesadaran Hukum & Kepatuhan Hukum: Suatu Percobaan Penerapan Metode Yuridis-Empiris untuk Mengukur Kesadaran Hukum dan Kepatuhan Hukum Mahasiswa Hukum terhadap Peraturan Lalu Lintas. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1982.
Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Pengertian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.
Valerine, J L K. Modul Metode Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2009.
Authors who publish with Mimbar Keadilan agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)