Two Settlement Pathways for Gross Violations of Human Rights Based on The Dignified Justice Theory
Abstract
Settlement of gross violations of human rights might be pursued by choosing two “paths” provided. The first “path” is via the Human Rights Court. This route is also called litigation settlement. The second path is an alternative “path”, and has been coined as the out of the Human Rights Court settlement. The problem is the Constitutional Court states that the alternative “path” as referred to in the Explanation of Article 47 of the Law on Human Rights Courts is contrary to the Constitution. As a result of the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision, the alternative “path” seems to be in a state of limbo, and this presupposes a legal issue of the lack of clarity on the meaning of a formulation of the applicable statutory provisions. In this paper, it is argued that Article 47 of the Law on Human Rights Courts still recognizes two “paths” for solving or settling cases of gross violations of human rights in the Pancasila legal system. The research method used in this paper is normative legal research, often known as the pure legal research method. It examined the primary legal materials. The theory used for understanding and explaining the problem is the Dignified Justice theory, the Indonesian Jurisprudence.
Downloads
References
Begem, Sarah Sarmila, Nurul Qamar, And Hamza Baharuddin. “Sistem Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham) Berat Melalui Mahkamah Pidana Internasional.” Sign Jurnal Hukum 1, No. 1 (2019): 1–17. Https://Doi.Org/10.37276/Sjh.V1i1.28.
Fadhil, Moh. “Impunitas Dan Penerapan Keadilan Transisi: Suatu Dilema Penyelesaian Kasus Pelanggaran Ham Berat Di Masa Lalu.” Petitum 8, No. 2 (2020): 100–113. Https://Doi.Org/10.36090/Jh.V8i2.817.
Firmandiaz, Viddy. “Berat Di Indonesia Oleh Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Ditinjau Dari Kewenangannya (Studi Kasus Timor-Timur ).” Res Publica 4, No. 1 (2020): 92–105.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Cetakan Pe. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2000.
Nasution, Aulia Rosa. “Penyelesaian Kasus Pelanggaran Ham Berat Melalui Pengadilan Nasional Dan Internasional Serta Komisi Kebenaran Dan Rekonsiliasi.” Jurnal Mercatoria 11, No. 1 (2018): 90. Https://Doi.Org/10.31289/Mercatoria.V11i1.1509.
Nugroho, Aldiano Hadi. “Kebijakan Pemerintah Joko Widodo Dan Jusuf Kalla Dalam Upaya Membangun Dialog Untuk Penyelesaian Konflik Vertikal Papua Tahun 2014-2019.” Journal Of Politic And Government 2, No. 1 (2019): 1–18. Https://Ejournal3.Undip.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jpgs/Article/View/24056.
Nugroho, Andito, And Muntasya Tajmahal. “Upaya Penegakan Pelanggaran Ham Berat Di Masa Lampau Berbasis Lembaga Independen.” Al-Hakam Islamic Law & Contemporary Issues 3, No. October (2022): 90–100.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Penelitian Hukum: Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Cetakan I. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019.
———. Sistem Hukum Pancasila (Sistem, Sistem Hukum Dan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia) Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Cetakan I. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2016.
Prasetyo, Teguh, And Abdul Halim Barkatullah. Filsafat, Teori, & Ilmu Hukum: Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat Yang Berkeadilan Dan Bermartabat. Cetakan I. Jakarta: Raja Grafika Persada, 2012.
Prasetyo, Teguh, And Jeferson Kameo. “Pancasila As The First And Foremost Source Of Laws: A Dignified Justice Philosophy.” Journal Of Legal, Ethical And Regulatory Issues 24, No. I (2021): 1–8.
Santoso, Bambang. “Kewenangan Jaksa Agung Dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Ham Berat Dihubungkan Dengan Prinsip Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan 5 (2018). Https://Core.Ac.Uk/Download/Pdf/196255896.Pdf.
Senjaya, Rustandi. “Pelanggaran Ham Yang Terjadi Di Papua Dan Poso.” Journal Of Islamic And Law Studies 6, No. 1 (2022): 76–88. Https://Doi.Org/10.18592/Jils.V6i1.7123.
Sitompul, Sofyan, And Dahlan Sinaga. Penemuan Hukum: Dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat (The Dignified Justice Jurisprudence). Cetakan I. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2021.
Ticoalu, Novita Maria, Cornelis Dj. Massie, And Josepus J.Pinori. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Transparansi Pemerintah Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham) Di Indonesia.” Lex Administratum Xi (2023).
Winandi, Woro, And Endah Dwirokhmeiti. “Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Berat Hak Asasi Manusia.” Tsl: The Spirit Of Law 6, No. 1 (2019): 48–61.
Authors who publish with Mimbar Keadilan agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
