ANALISIS TINDAK TUTUR WACANA HUMOR AGAMA-AGAMA DI INDONESIA

  • Jupriono Jupriono Prodi Ilmu Komunikasi, FISIP, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya;
  • Ambar Andayani Prodi Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Abstract

Abstract. The colorful and dynamic relation between religious people in Indonesia arises not only various differences of perception, point of view, and social conflict even terrorism, but it also grows religious humor in social interaction. Religious humor includes exclusive-esoteric humor and inclusive-exoteric humor. Exclusive-esoteric humor is dominated with human perception which views that belief, ritual service and social praxis of other's are wrong, strange and shallow. Inclusive-exoteric humor is properly in the form of paradox, parody and satire of social attitude from the leader of a religion. The quality of humor from exclusive-esoteric as well as inclusive-exoteric are built by violating speech act norms in common, the cooperative principle, politeness principle, and pragmatic parameter which operate in communication of religious people in daily social interaction. Keywords: humor discourse, exclusive-esoteric humor, inclusive-exoteric humor, speech act, pragmatic parameter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benton, L. 2015.“Fighting Terrorism: The Armor Called Humorâ€. Havok Journal, 01, 2015. http://havokjournal.com/politics/fighting-terrorism-armor-called-humor/ (akses 29/01/2018)

Bowo, M. 2012. Cerita tentang Kiai Sabar.http://sufisbook.blogspot.com/2012/02/anekdot-sufi-jawa-cerita-tentang-kiai.html (akses 29 Januari 2018)

Bungin, B. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kdebijakan Publik, Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Prenada MediaGroup.

Chiaro, D. 2002. The Language of Jokes. London: Routledge.

Dananjaya, J. 1997. Folklor Indonesia: Ilmu Gosip, Dongeng, dll. Cet. V. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Dennet, D.C. 2007. Breaking The Spell:Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. London: Penguin.

Haryatmoko. 2010. Dominasi Penuh Muslihat: Akar Kekerasan dan Diskriminasi. Jakarta:PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Istiningtyas, L. 2014. “Humor dalam Kajian Psikologi Islamâ€. Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 15(1).http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/JIA/article/view/479(akses 29/01/2018)

Jupriono, D. 2009. “Wacana Humor Gus Dur dalam Perspektif Tindak Tuturâ€. http://sastra-bahasa.blogspot.com(akses 29/01/2018)

Jupriono, D. 2010. “Lelucon Etnis Madura dalam Perspektif Multikulturalismeâ€. Dlm. Prosiding Seminar Nasional 2 Bahasa dan Sastra dalam Perspektif Multikultural, R. Inayati & S. Hanifa (ed.) (hal. 29-44). Surabaya: Lima-Lima Jaya & Prodi Sastra Inggris, FISIB, Unijoyo, Bangkalan.

Jupriono, D. 2013. “Wacana Humor Agama di Indonesiaâ€. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pemberdayaan Bahasa dan Sastra, (hal. 32-42). UTM Bangkalan, Juni 2013.

Jupriono, D.; Hamim; Darmawan, D. 2017. “Komunikasi Humor pada Berita Hoax di Media Sosialâ€. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Membangun Etika Komunikasi Politik dalam Ruang Media Massa, (hal. 165-180). ASPIKOM & Univ. PGRI Ronggolawe, Tuban, 09/07/2017.

Levinson, S.C. 2005. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Littlejohn, S.W. 2012. Theories of Human Communication. Belmont: Wardsworth Publ. Co.

Martin,E. 2011. “Terrorism, humor, and American popular cultureâ€. Global Media and Communication 7(3), 233-237

Mulyana, D. 2006. Komunikasi Jenaka: Parade Anekdot, Humor, dan Pengalaman Konyol. Cet III. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Yule, G. 2013. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published
2018-05-31
How to Cite
1.
Jupriono J, Andayani A. ANALISIS TINDAK TUTUR WACANA HUMOR AGAMA-AGAMA DI INDONESIA. parafrase [Internet]. 31May2018 [cited 3May2024];18(01). Available from: https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/parafrase/article/view/1381
Section
Articles