TEKS BERITA KONFLIK PEKERJA PT FREEPORT INDONESIA: ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS FOUCAULT

  • Yudhi Hari Wibowo

Abstract

ABSTRACT. This study reports a critical discourse analysis on news reports on labour conflicts at PT Freeport Indonesia. The study adopts Foucault’s approaches to critical discourse analysis. According to Foucault, a discourse is an organized language constructing social practice in order to change or to maintain power domination. In this perspective, language is recognized as both the power and the instrument. The analysis article examines the news on the PT Freeport Indonesia labour conflict from the viewpoints of topic, data, theme identification, the search of hidden discourse elements, the search of meaning relationship among the discourse elements, the contextualization of the discourse elements of the power-knowledge network. The results show that the difference of the wages based on biopolical practices under the basis of race discrimination among the Freeport labours triggered the horizontal conflict that was settled under the control of the company. The study also found an indication of a practice of panoptic. This control was effective to settle the conflict because it demanded the obediance productivities on the side of the labours. However, this kind of control camuflased the reality of the Freeport’s massive profit gaining, Freeport’s exploration that damaged the environment, and Timika people’s living in poverty. 

 

Key words: critical discourse analysis, race discrimination, biopolitic, hidden elements, knowledge power

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alba-Juez, L. 2009. Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Berita Metro, 22 Februari 2012. “Desak Freeport Naikkan Royaltiâ€, hal. 1, 7.

Berita Metro, 27 Februari 2012. “Menata Aturan Pertambangan di Indonesia: Rawan KKN, Kontrol dan Pengawasan Lemahâ€, hal. 5.

Berita Metro, 28 Februari 2012. “Produksi Freeport Berhenti Sementara Akibat Intimidasi Karyawanâ€, hal. 5.

Bungin, B. 2003. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Eriyanto. 2005. “Wacana: Perspektif Foucaultâ€, (65—84) dl. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKIS.

Foucault, M. 2011. “The History of Sexualityâ€. http://socialmasterpice.blogspot.com (Akses 2 Januari 2013)

Harsono, A. 2008. “Fakta, Fakta, Fakta†(hal. Xii—xxv) dlm. Jurnalisme Sastrawi: Antologi Liputan Mendalam dan Memikat. A. Harsono & B. Setiyono (ed.). Jakarta: KPG & Yayasan Pantau.

Haryatmoko. 2010. “Michel Foucault Membuka Kedok Pengetahuan, Kekuasaan, dan Kebenaranâ€, (8-13) dlm. Dominasi Penuh Muslihat: Akar Kekerasan dan Diskriminasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Haryatmoko. 2012. “Michel Foucault dan Politik Kekuasaan: Membongkar Teknik, Mekanisme, dan Strategi Kekuasaanâ€. Materi Pelatihan Analsisis Wacana Michel Foucault. UK2JT, FIB Unair, 1 Maret 2012.

Jawa Pos, 22 Februari 2012. “2011, Freeport Setor Rp 21 Tâ€, hal. 5.

Jupriono, D. 2012. “Analisis Wacana Deskriptif & Analisis Wacana Kritis: Analisis Berita Konflik Buruh Tambang PT Freeport Indonesia†(17—27) dlm. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Wacana Bahasa dan Sastra Bandingan sebagai Khasanah Nusantara. Ed. Misnadin-Masduki. Surabaya: CV Putra Media Nusantara. http://sastra-bahasa.blogspot.com (Akses 2 Januari 2013)

Jupriono, D. 2012a. “Race Discrimination as Conflict Base of Freeport Indonesia Corporation Labor in Foucault Perspectiveâ€. Kertas kerja The 3rd International Conference, Urban Mobility: Its Impacts on Socio-cultural and Health Issues, World Health Organization (WHO) & Faculty of Humanities, Unair Surabaya, 7—8 December 2012.

Kelly, M. 2010. “Michel Foucaultâ€. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/foucault/ (Akses 20 Agustus 2012)

Kompas, 20 Februari 2012. “Tambang Banyak Picu Masalahâ€, (1, 15).

Kovach, B. & T. Rosenstiel. 2001. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Crown Publishers.

Kovacs, A. 2005. “The Role of a Political Identity Code in Defining the Boundaries of Public and Private: The Example of Latent Antisemitism†(269—281) dlm. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinary. R. Wodak & P. Chilton (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publ. Co.

Littlejohn, S.W. 1996. Theories of Human Communication. Belmont: Wardsworth Publ. Co.

Mulyana, D. 2008. Komunikasi Massa: Kontroversi, Teori, Aplikasi. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.

O’Farrell, C. 2007. “Key conceptsâ€. www.michel-foucault.com/concepts/index.html

Santoso, A. 2010. “Teori Wacana: dari Paradigma Deskriptif ke Paradigma Kritisâ€. http://studibahasakritis. Blogspot.com/2010/05/ (Akses 20 Agustus 2012)

Sumadiria, A.S.H. 2005. Jurnalistik Indonesia, Menulis Berita dan Feature: Panduan Praktis Jurnalis Profesional. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Tjandra, S. 2012. “Orientasi Gerakan Buruhâ€. Kompas, 1 Mei, hal. 6.

Van Dijk, T.A. 2005. “Contextual Knowledge Management in Discourse Production: A CDA Perspective††(71—100) dlm. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinary. R. Wodak & P. Chilton (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Woodside-Jiron, H. 2004. “Language, Power, and Participation: Using Critical Discourse Analysis to Make Sense of Public Policy†(173—206) dlm. An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. R. Rogers (ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associaties, Inc.

Published
2013-02-01
How to Cite
1.
Wibowo Y. TEKS BERITA KONFLIK PEKERJA PT FREEPORT INDONESIA: ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS FOUCAULT. parafrase [Internet]. 1Feb.2013 [cited 28Apr.2024];13(01). Available from: https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/parafrase/article/view/226
Section
Articles