TEKS BERITA KONFLIK PEKERJA PT FREEPORT INDONESIA: ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS FOUCAULT

Authors

  • Yudhi Hari Wibowo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/parafrase.v13i01.226

Abstract

ABSTRACT. This study reports a critical discourse analysis on news reports on labour conflicts at PT Freeport Indonesia. The study adopts Foucault’s approaches to critical discourse analysis. According to Foucault, a discourse is an organized language constructing social practice in order to change or to maintain power domination. In this perspective, language is recognized as both the power and the instrument. The analysis article examines the news on the PT Freeport Indonesia labour conflict from the viewpoints of topic, data, theme identification, the search of hidden discourse elements, the search of meaning relationship among the discourse elements, the contextualization of the discourse elements of the power-knowledge network. The results show that the difference of the wages based on biopolical practices under the basis of race discrimination among the Freeport labours triggered the horizontal conflict that was settled under the control of the company. The study also found an indication of a practice of panoptic. This control was effective to settle the conflict because it demanded the obediance productivities on the side of the labours. However, this kind of control camuflased the reality of the Freeport’s massive profit gaining, Freeport’s exploration that damaged the environment, and Timika people’s living in poverty. 

 

Key words: critical discourse analysis, race discrimination, biopolitic, hidden elements, knowledge power

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2011. Conversation Technique.http://changingminds.org/techniques/conversation/ interrupting/interrupting.htm

Anonymous.2010 Developing a Communicative Strategy.http://www.idrc.ca/uploads/user-S/11606746331Sheet01_CommStrategy

Anonymus.2010 Persuasive technique.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_definition

Anonymous. 2010. Politeness Theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/politeness

Anonymous. 2000. Talk Show Definition.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk_show

Bayram, F. 2010. Ideology and Political Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Erdogan Political Speech. http://research.ncl.ac.uk/ARECLS/vol7_documents/bayram_vol7.pdf

Belinda, W. 2009. Adjacency Pairs of Initiating and Responding Acts Produced by the Host and the Guests in Kick Andy Show. Petra Christian University Surabaya.

Bogdan, R. C. and Biklen. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allen and Bacon, Inc.

Fairclough, N. 2002.The dialectics of discourse.http://www.geogr.ku.dk/couses/phd/ globloc/ papers/phdfairclough2.pdf

Fairclough, N. 1995.Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. 1989.Language and power. London: Longman.

Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. ibid. Reprinted in Studies in the Way of Words, ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1989).

Jorgensen, M., Phillips, L. 2002.Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Kick Andy Show profile available at http://www.kickandy.com.

Kick Andy video playback available at www.youtube.com

Luke, A. 1997.Theory and Practice in Critical Discourse Analysis in L. Saha (Ed): International encyclopedia of the sociology of education Elseiver Science, Ltd.

McGregor, S.2003 Critical Discourse Analysis-a primer. http://www.gslis.untexas.edu./ï¾

Palmquis/courses/discourse.

Oktavianty, I.N. 2008. A Comparative Study of Language, Power and Ideology in Insert Investigasiand SiletInfotainment Programs: A Study of Critical Discourse Analysis. Thesis. Malang:Brawijaya University.

Orlich, C.D., Harder, R.J., Callahan, R.C., Trevisan, M., Brown, A.H. 2010. Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction. http://books.google.com/books.

Penz, H. 1996. Language and Control in American TVTalk Shows: An Analysis of Linguistic Strategies. Germany: Gunter NarrVerlag Tubingen.

Pramadhani, S.I. 2009.Politeness Strategy Used in Kick Andy Talk Show. Unpublished.Thesis. Surabaya: Airlangga University.

Rasyidah, I. 2010. Conversational Implicatures in Kick Andy Talk Show. Unpublished.Thesis.Surabaya: Airlangga University.

Sheyholislami, J. 2001. Critical Discourse Analysis.http://www.carleton.ca/~jsheyhol/cda.htm

Downloads

Published

2013-02-01

How to Cite

1.
Wibowo YH. TEKS BERITA KONFLIK PEKERJA PT FREEPORT INDONESIA: ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS FOUCAULT. parafrase [Internet]. 2013Feb.1 [cited 2026Feb.6];13(01). Available from: https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/parafrase/article/view/226

Issue

Section

Articles