REBELLION OF MAIN CHARACTER IN LAUREN DESTEFANO’S WITHER

  • Nadiah Nur Fatimah
  • Linusia Marsih
Keywords: rebellion, dystopian-life

Abstract

This study aims to reveal rebellion of main character in Lauren DeStefano’s Wither. The discussion is focused on Rhine’s rebellion which is trigerred by dystopian-life happened in the society. In revealing the rebellion reflected in the novel, Mercuse’s theory of rebellion and Millner’s theory of dystopian-life are applied. The research method applied in this study is descriptive qualitative with intrinsic and extrinsic approaches. Based on the analysis, the writer finds out that among the nine dystopian society characteristics, the writer has found five characteristics that are reflected in Wither, namely the society is an illusion of utopia world; the natural world is being a banished and distrusted world; perception under constant surveillance; fear ot the outside world; and information, independent thought, and freedom are restricted. In addition, the analysis of the main character’s rebellion shows that the rebellion happens as the impact of dystopian society faced by the main character. Rhine’s rebellion is done in four ways – having intention to escape from Linden’s house, refusing to be consummated by her husband, having relationship with Gabriel, and escaping. The reasons of Rhine’s rebellion are wanting to be reunited with her brother and wanting to have freedom. After doing the analysis, the writer finds out that science and technology should be developed for human’s better condition. Science and technology must not be expected beyond God’s power. When science and technology is developed without consideration in terms of humanity, it will result in chaosness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arabi, L. Titan. (2016). Dystopia In Lauren Kate’s Rapture. Departments of English Language

Coman, A., Johnson, B., Briggs, G., and Aha, D.W. (2017). Social Attitudes of AI Rebellion: A Framework. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 93-104.

Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitatve, and Method Approached. California: Sage Publication.

Demir, A., and Selma, V.J. (2016). To Read And Learn: The Necessity For A New Definition Of Dystopia And Bridging The Gap Between The Old And Contemporary Dystopias. Anafora, 4(2), pp.421-439. http://doi.org/10.29162/ANAFORA.v4i2.16

Gheeta, M. (2014). Theory of Dystopia Unfolded - A Bird’s-eye View of Shirshendu Mukhopadhyay’s “The Insect”. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 19(7), pp.117-119

Global Index Peace. http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2019/06/GPI-2019-web003.pdf. Pp10

Grossman, Lev. (2012). Literary Revolution in the Supermarket Aisle: Genre Fiction Is Disruptive Technology.

Girous, H. (2003) "Utopian thinking under the sign of neoliberalism: Towards a critical pedagogy of educated hope". Democracy & Nature. 9 (1): 91–105.

Holden, A. (2015). On Socialization and Rebellion: A Sociological Analysis of the Religious Experiences of Young Jehovah's Witnesses'. Department of Sociology at Lancaster University.

Keller, D. (1984). Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism. Berkeley and London: University of California Press (USA).

Millner, A. (2004). Darker Cities: Urban Dystopia and Science Fiction Cinema. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(3), pp.259-279. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1367877904046303

Moleong, Lexy J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Petersen, R. (2009). A Community Based Theory of Rebellion. Eouropean Journal of Sociology, 41-78.

Read Write Think. (2006). http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/lesson_images/lesson926/DefinitionCharacteristics.pdf accessed on October 4th, 2019.

Talcott, P. (1942). Propoganda and Social Control. William Alanson White Psychiatric Foundation. Pp.551-572.

Published
2020-07-31
How to Cite
Fatimah, N., & Marsih, L. (2020). REBELLION OF MAIN CHARACTER IN LAUREN DESTEFANO’S WITHER. Anaphora : Journal of Language, Literary, and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v3i1.3546
Section
Articles