Feasibility Study of Infrastructure Investment (Tail Dock) Using Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Payback Period (PP) Methods

  • Henri Ponda Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • Nur Fadilah Fatma Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • Jordi Haidar Azis Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
Keywords: Feasibility Study; Infrastructure Investment; Internal Rate of Return (IRR); Net Present Value (NPV); Payback Period (PP)

Abstract

In the aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) sector, facility adequacy is crucial to meet increasing service demands. PT ABC, a leading MRO company, faced a bottleneck due to a lack of tail dock infrastructure, impacting its ability to fulfill aircraft maintenance orders. This study evaluates the investment feasibility of constructing or purchasing a movable tail dock for Line B operations. The financial analysis was conducted using Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Payback Period (PP) methods. Results show that manufacturing the movable tail dock internally yields a Net Present Value (NPV) of IDR 673,580,000, an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 18.25%, and a Payback Period (PP) of 9.7 years. These results indicate that the investment is financially feasible, as NPV is positive, IRR exceeds the company's Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR), and the Payback Period is within acceptable limits. Thus, building the movable tail dock internally is the preferred investment option.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yildiz, M., & Gürbüz, A., “Financial performance evaluation of infrastructure investments using ratio analysis,” J. Infrastruct. Syst, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 04018023, 2018.

Zhang, W., & Chen, H., “Evaluating the risk of capital projects using simulation-based NPV analysis,” Int. J. Proj. Manag, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 588–601, 2021.

Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C., Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning, 2019.

Rahman, M. A., Islam, M. T., & Ahmed, K., “Capital budgeting practices in developing countries: A case study,” J. Account. Financ. Emerg. Econ, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 743–761, 2020.

Nguyen, T. D., Pham, T. M., & Tran, Q. H., “Financial feasibility analysis of infrastructure investment projects in Southeast Asia,” Financ. Stud., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 124–139, 2021.

Kengatharan, L., “Capital budgeting practices: Evidence from Sri Lanka,” Int. J. Econ. Financ, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 96–104, 2016.

Friedlob, G. T. & Schleifer, L. L. F., Essentials of Financial Analysis. Wiley, 2018.

Bank Indonesia, “Suku Bunga BI Rate.” https://www.bi.go.id (accessed Jan. 22, 2025).

World Bank, “Global Economic Prospects,” 2022. https://www.worldbank.org (accessed Jan. 22, 2025).

Tandelilin, E., Portofolio dan Investasi: Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2020.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H., “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior and agency costs,” J. Financ. Econ, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305–360, 2016.

Gitman, L. J., Zutter, C. J., & Smart, S. B., Principles of Managerial Finance. Pearson Education, 2022.

Chua, D., & Swee, E., “Financial performance of public infrastructure projects in ASEAN,” J. Constr. Financ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 33–49, 2019.

Mahajan, A., “Risk analysis in infrastructure projects: Case study from airport expansion,” Int. J. Infrastruct. Manag, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 87–101, 2020.

Lee, S., & Park, J., “Infrastructure investment decision-making using IRR and Monte Carlo simulation,” Eng. Econ. Rev, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 204–215, 2017.

Published
2025-07-10
How to Cite
Ponda, H., Fatma, N., & Azis, J. (2025). Feasibility Study of Infrastructure Investment (Tail Dock) Using Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Payback Period (PP) Methods. Heuristic, 22(1), 71 - 78. https://doi.org/10.30996/heuristic.v22i1.131909
Section
Articles