IMPLEMENTATION OF TAX INVOICE CRIME PREVENTION POLICY IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Helmi Satria Fahmi STIA LAN Jakarta
  • Nurliah Nurdin STIA LAN Jakarta

Keywords:

VAT, Tax Invoice, Implementation, Crime Prevention

Abstract

Fiscal policy plays an important role in economic growth and maintaining inflation stability. VAT is one of the tax innovations and has experienced tremendous development. Crimes against tax invoices include not depositing taxes that have been collected and issuing and/or using tax invoices that are not based on actual transactions, often called Fictitious/unauthorized Tax Invoice. This research is expected to explain the factors that influence the implementation of tax invoice crime prevention policies. This research uses a qualitative method. The data collection method is done by observation, in-depth interview, and FGD. There were 13 Tax Investigators, 2 Tax Practitioners, and 4 Academics as informants who were interviewed and involved in FGDs. The results of the research on the implementation of the tax invoice crime prevention policy concluded that an integrated tax invoice crime prevention policy strategy framework is needed starting from the stage of confirming PKP until the tax invoice is issued and reported on the VAT periodic tax return. In addition, accuracy of information, consistency in application and clarity of feedback are required. Continuous improvement of procedures and political support from policy makers are absolutely necessary. Further steps are needed to publish the policy framework of the Tax Invoice crime prevention strategy in Indonesia in a regulation issued by the Director General of Taxes which is expected to be implemented properly

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Helmi Satria Fahmi, STIA LAN Jakarta

Student at Faculty of Public Administration, STIA LAN Jakarta

Nurliah Nurdin, STIA LAN Jakarta

Academic at Faculty of Public Administration, STIA LAN Jakarta

References

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Darussalam, Septriadi, D., & Dhora, K. A. (2018). Konsep dan Studi Komparasi Pajak Pertambahan Nilai. DDTC.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2022). Laporan Tahunan 2022 Bersama dalam semangat reformasi, menjadikan kinerja unggul sebagai tradisi. Retrieved from https://pajak.go.id/id/tahunan-page

Djufri, M. (2023). Implementasi Kebijakan Insentif Pajak Pertambahan Nilai sebagai Instrumen Pendukung Program Gerakan Nasional Bangga Buatan Indonesia. 4(4), 131–142.

Dunn, W. N. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Pulblik (p. 710). p. 710. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Dye, T. R. (2017). Understanding Public Policy Fifteenth Edition (Fifteenth). Pearson Education.

Ebrill, L., Keen, M., & Summers, V. (2001). The Modern VAT. In The Modern VAT. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589060265.071

Fahmi, H. S. (2024). Strategi Implementasi Kebijakan Pencegahan Kejahatan Faktur Pajak di Indonesia. STIA LAN JAKARTA.

Fischer, F., Miller, G. ., & Sidney, M. . (2020). Handbook Analisis Kebijakan Publik Teori, Politik dan Metode. Penerbit Nusa Media.

Hidayat, A., Ramdan, A., & Ramadhani, I. (2017). NILAI OLEH BENDAHARA DI KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT TAHUN 2016.

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing Public Policy. SAGE Publications, Inc.

James, K. (2015). The Rise of the Value-Added Tax. Cambridge University Press, 1–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107358522

Krever, R. (2014). Combating VAT Fraud : Lessons from Korea ?

Lab, S. P. (2016). Crime Prevention: Approaches, Practices, and Evaluations, Ninth Edition.

Marzuki, R. (2022). Analisis implementasi kebijakan pengkreditan pajak masukan dalam masa pajak tidak sama. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review), (9).

Mustami, Adinda Ade & Winarto, Y. (2018). Ditjen Pajak suspend 1.049 WP terindikasi penerbit faktur ilegal. https://doi.org/https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ditjen-pajak-suspend-1049-wp-terindikasi-penerbit-faktur-ilegal?page=1

Nugraha, A., Rahmat, D., Hendayani, E., & Ramadhan, H. (2020). IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK ( Studi Kasus pada Wajib Pajak Industri Tekstil di Kantor Wilayah DJP Jawa Barat I ). 11, 120–131.

Nugroho, R. (2017). Public Policy Edisi 6. PT Alex Media Komputindo.

Parsons, W. (2011). Public Policy : Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Safitra, D. A. (2019). Implementasi E-Tax Invoice: Sebuah Studi Komparatif. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review), 2(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v2i1.508

Simatupang, K. A., & Dompak, T. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM E-FILING DALAM UPAYA PENINGKATAN KUALITAS E-GOVERNMENT KANTOR PELAYANAN. 1.

Simon Nahak. (2014). Hukum Pidana Perpajakan Konsep Penal Policy Tindak Pidana Perpajakan dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum. Setara Pers.

Sipayung, R. S. G. S. (2023). Indonesia 2024: Meniti Kemajuan di Tengah Rengkuhan Tantangan. Retrieved from Sekretariat Kabinet Indonesia website: https://setkab.go.id/indonesia-2024-meniti-kemajuan-di-tengah-rengkuhan-tantangan/

Sukardji, U. (2018). Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Edisi Revisi 2015. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Winarno, B. (2016). Kebijakan Publik Era Globalisasi. CAPS (Center of Academic Publishing Service).

Yanow, D. (2022). Metode Kualitatif - Interpretif dalam Penelitian Kebijakan dalam Handbook Analisis Kebijakan Publik Teori, Politik dan Metode.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Satria Fahmi, H., & Nurdin, N. (2025). IMPLEMENTATION OF TAX INVOICE CRIME PREVENTION POLICY IN INDONESIA. DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 23(02), 547–565. Retrieved from https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dia/article/view/12122

Issue

Section

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION