STRATEGY FOR ENFORCING THE KPK EMPLOYEE CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT: LESSONS FROM INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES
Keywords:
KPK, code of ethics, code of conduct, ethics enforcement, best practicesAbstract
The enforcement of ethical codes and behavior within law enforcement agencies is crucial to ensuring the integrity and accountability of these institutions, particularly in the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Although KPK has established an ethical code, there are challenges related to the independence of the institution, transparency in supervision, and whistleblower protection, which can diminish the effectiveness of the enforcement of the ethical code. This article aims to analyze the ethical code enforcement systems in three countries with effective anti-corruption systems: Singapore, Canada, and Finland, and how these principles can be applied in the context of KPK. The study finds that the independence of supervisory bodies, transparency in the supervision process, whistleblower protection, and independent audits are key factors in the success of ethical code enforcement in these countries. Based on these findings, this article recommends that KPK strengthen the independence of its Supervisory Board, improve transparency in investigation processes, and adopt a stronger whistleblower protection system. Additionally, KPK should implement independent audits conducted regularly to enhance accountability and strengthen public trust in the institution. By adapting these elements, KPK can improve the effectiveness of law enforcement and achieve a more sustainable goal of corruption eradication in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Akbar, A. M. S. (2021). Efektivitas kewenangan Dewan Pengawas KPK berdasarkan norma hukum Pasal 37B UU No. 19 Tahun 2019 perspektif maslahah mursalah [Skripsi Sarjana]. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara, Jilid II. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2008). Pokok-pokok hukum tata negara Indonesia. BIP Kelompok Gramedia.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). Peradilan etik dan etika konstitusi (Cet. ke-2). Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2016). Perkembangan dan konsolidasi lembaga negara pasca reformasi (Cet. ke-3). Sinar Grafika.
Atmadja, I. D. G. (2012). *Hukum konstitusi, problematika konstitusi Indonesia sesudah perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945*. Setara Press.
Barker, A. S., & Edwards, T. W. (2015). The Role of Ethics Commissions in Preventing Corruption. Journal of Public Integrity, 7(4), 123-145.
doi: 10.1080/19473258.2015.1132723
Bello, P. C. K. L. (2025). Penegakan kode etik dan kode perilaku KPK oleh Dewan Pengawas KPK. Honeste Vivere, 35(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.55809/hvv3511.424
Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB). (n.d.). Corruption Prevention and Investigation. Government of Singapore. Retrieved from https://www.cpi.gov.sg
Danian, R. P. (2024). Kinerja Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam pengawasan penyelenggaraan tugas KPK [Skripsi Sarjana]. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Djaja, E. (2009). Memberantas korupsi bersama KPK: Kajian yuridis normatif UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 junto UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 Versi UU No. 30 Tahun 2002. Sinar Grafika.
Finnish National Bureau of Investigation (KRP). (n.d.). About KRP. Finnish Government. Retrieved from https://www.poliisi.fi/en/krp
Friedrichs, D. O. (2016). Corruption and Organized Crime in an Evolving Era. Cambridge University Press.
Horsley, J. W. (2019). Ethical Leadership and the Fight Against Corruption: A Global Perspective. International Journal of Ethics and Governance, 22(1), 98-112. doi: 10.1080/19471660.2019.1578380
Indrayana, D. (2016). Jangan bunuh KPK. Intrans Publishing.
Johnston, M. (2014). The Integrity System and the Problem of Corruption: A Framework for Prevention. Global Integrity Journal, 15(2), 48-69. doi: 10.1016/j.gi.2014.06.009
Mahfud, M. D. (2004). Demokrasi dan konstitusi di Indonesia. Rineka Cipta.
Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.
Mochtar, Z. A. (2016). Lembaga negara independen: Dinamika perkembangan dan urgensi penataannya kembali pasca-amandemen konstitusi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Musanef. (2007). Manajemen kepegawaian di Indonesia. Gunung Agung.
Nasuha, R. P., & Isharyanto. (2024). Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (KPK) pasca perubahan Undang-Undang KPK. Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik, 8(1), 11–23.
OECD. (2016). Committing to Effective Whistleblower Protection. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2016/03/committing-to-effective-whistleblower-protection_g1g65d0a/9789264252639-en.pdf
OECD. (2020). OECD Public Integrity Handbook. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/publications/oecd-public-integrity-handbook_598692a5
Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (CIEC). (n.d.). Conflict of Interest and Ethics. Government of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.ociiec-bciv.gc.ca
Ramdoni, M. A. (2020). Urgensi Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Studi analisis UU No. 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) [Skripsi Sarjana]. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Rialdo, W. (2021). Pengalihan status pegawai Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi menjadi aparatur sipil negara untuk mendukung kinerja Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam pencegahan dan pemberantasan korupsi [Tesis Magister]. Universitas Andalas.
Simabura, C. (2016). Pengisian jabatan lembaga negara independen. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Thoha, M. (2008). Ilmu administrasi publik kontemporer. Prenadamedia Group.
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. Transparency International. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rina Martina Puspitasari, Hidayaturahmi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The DiA journal allows authors to retain the copyright of their papers without limitation. Authors may grant publishers non-exclusive publishing rights to publish articles. Granting first publishing rights to publishers also qualifies as unlimited copyright (because there are no restrictions imposed by publishers on author copyright).


