EVALUATION OF HAJJ FUND MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA
Keywords:
Hajj fund management Indonesia, evaluation planning, policy evaluation, accountability governance, investment risk management, Islamic finance compliance, transparency and public trust.Abstract
Hajj fund management in Indonesia is crucial for sustainable Hajj financing and for improving Hajj service quality for pilgrims. This article aims to strengthen policy evaluation and evaluation planning for Hajj fund management by placing accountability at the center of public governance. A persistent problem is how investment returns and investment risk management translate into fair, transparent, and efficient financing outcomes. Using a conceptual literature review and policy document analysis, the study designs an evaluation plan for Badan Pengelola Keuangan Haji. The approach follows the Evaluation Planning and Implementation Cycle model and structures an evaluation planning matrix. The results show that process and implementation evaluation is the most actionable entry point for improving Hajj fund governance. Priority evaluation domains include investment policy, portfolio performance, and risk controls; allocation rules between program costs, benefit returns, and reserves; transparency, disclosure, and public reporting; stakeholder participation, grievance handling, and service responsiveness; compliance with Islamic finance principles; procurement integrity and operational efficiency; and coordination among supervisory, audit, and regulatory institutions. Recommended indicators combine financial returns, risk exposure, compliance, timeliness of reporting, and stakeholder satisfaction, using portfolio data, audited statements, and stakeholder feedback. The planning matrix links each question to data sources, analytic methods, and responsible actors, enabling timely feedback to improve processes and prevent misuse. It also clarifies trade offs between risk tolerance, returns, and affordability. Overall, systematic evaluation planning improves accountability, safeguards long term sustainability, and strengthens public trust in Hajj fund management Indonesia, while providing a practical roadmap for continuous service improvement.
Downloads
References
Abadi, Muhammad Taufiq., dkk. (2024). Manajemen Pengelolaan Dana Haji Pada Badan Pengelola Keuangan Haji (BPKH). Jurnal Ilmiah Research and Development Student (JIS). 2(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.59024/jis.v2i1.566
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European law journal, 13(4)
Braun, D., & Guston, D. H. (2003). Principal-agent Theory and Research Policy: an Introduction. Science and Public Policy, 30(5)
Connors, Sarah. (2016). Geopolicy: Science and the Policy Cycle. https://blogs.egu.eu/geolog/2016/09/14/geopolicy-science-and-the-policy-cycle/
Deviyanti, P. (2015) Mekanisme Pengawasan Komisi Pengawas Haji Indonesia Pada Penyelenggaraan Haji di Indonesia.
Dunn. William N., (1999). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik Edisi Kedua, Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction Second Edition. Gajah Mada University Press
Ghazinoory, S., & Aghaei, P. (2021). Differences Between Policy Assessment & Policy Evaluation: A Case Study on Supportive Policies for Knowledge-based Firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120801
Holden, Debra J., Zimmerman, Marc A., (2009). A Practical Guide to Program Evaluation Planning: Theory and Case Examples. Sage Publication, Inc
Howlett, Michael, Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Public Subsystem. Oxford University Press
Imansyah, Fadlul. (2024). Strategi & Manajemen Pengelolaan Keuangan Haji BPKH. Humas BPKH.
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2013). Governance in the Public Sector: A Governing Body Perspective. Consultation Draft for an International Framework. 6-39.
Kasri, Rahmatina A. (2024). Menjaga Keberlanjutan Dana Haji. Disampaikan pada Regular Sharia Discussion. Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia (IAI).
Kurniawan, E. (2021). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Haji Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam. 7(03). 1449-1456. http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v7i3.2682
Lehtonen, M. (2005). OECD Environmental Performance Review Programme: Accountability (f) or learning?. Evaluation, 11(2)
Lindberg, S. I. (2013). Mapping Accountability: Core Concept and Subtypes. International Review of Administrative Aciences, 79(2)
Nugroho, Riant. (2018). Public Policy: Dinamika Kebijakan Publik, Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Manajemen Politik Kebijakan Publik, dan Etika Kebijakan Publik, Cetakan Keenam, Elex Media Komputindo
Prabowo, Muhammad Agung. dkk. (2024). Strategi Investasi Syariah Dana Haji: Analisis Kepatuhan Syariah sebagai Pilar Transformasi Badan Pengelola Keuangan Haji. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen. 11(1), 240-250.
Primadhany, Erry Fitria. (2017). Tinjauan Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Badan Pengelola Keuangan Haji (BPKH) Dalam Melakukan Penempatan Dan/Atau Investasi Keuangan Haji. Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah. 8(2). 125-141.
Selepe, M. M. (2023). The Evaluation of Public Policy Implementation Failures and Possible Solutions. EUREKA Social and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2023.002736
Stewart, Joseph, Hedge, David M., Lester, James P. (2008). Public Policy : An Evolutionary Approach. Boston : Kluwer Law International
Teasdale, R. M., Strasser, M., Moore, C., & Graham, K. E. (2023). Evaluative Criteria in Practice: Findings from an Analysis of Evaluations Published in Evaluation and Program Planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97, 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102226
Yuniar, Adela Miranti., dkk. (2023). Optimalisasi Pengelolaan Dana Haji yang Berkeadilan dan Berkelanjutan. PEBS FEB UI, 1(1). 1-5.
Yusuf, Amri. (2023). Kontroversi Biaya Haji. Diakses pada 23 September 2024. https://BPKH.go.id/kontroversi-biaya-haji/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Iqbal Jafar, Laode Rudita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The DiA journal allows authors to retain the copyright of their papers without limitation. Authors may grant publishers non-exclusive publishing rights to publish articles. Granting first publishing rights to publishers also qualifies as unlimited copyright (because there are no restrictions imposed by publishers on author copyright).


