BEST PRACTICE OF SMART GOVERNANCE INNOVATION IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN BADUNG REGENCY
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui transformasi pelayanan publik dan bentuk inovasi digital dalam peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik di Mal Pelayanan Publik Badung. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan dokumentasi dari website, surat kabar, dan jurnal yang relevan dengan penelitian. Analisis data pada penelitian ini juga menggunakan fitur Concept Map pada NVIVO12 Plus. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa bentuk pelayanan publik di Kabupaten Badung lebih mengutamakan model birokrasi pemerintahan yang inovatif karena proses pelayanan kepada masyarakat yang semula menggunakan kertas telah berubah dengan memanfaatkan teknologi digital. Terbentuknya Mal Pelayanan Publik Badung yang dianalisis menggunakan teori tata kelola inovatif secara riil, meningkatkan kualitas dan kuantitas pelayanan publik. Hal ini terlihat dari 29 instansi yang bekerja dan berafiliasi dengan Pemerintah, swasta, BUMN/BUMD, serta memiliki 12 fasilitas yang memadai. Pendirian Mall Pelayanan Publik juga mempengaruhi jumlah pengunjung yang datang setiap harinya karena berbagai pelayanan dalam satu tempat dapat dilayani dengan mudah dan cepat.
Downloads
References
Agustian, R. A. (2018). Desain Otonomi Daerah Dalam Kerangka Penegasan Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum, 12(2), 2159–2169.
Al-Qatamin, A. A., & Al-Omari, M. H. (2020). A study of the effect of information technology governance on quality of information technology services: The case of Jordan Customs Department. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9, 41–55.
Ali, A., Iqbal, S., Haider, S. A., Tehseen, S., Anwar, B., Sohail, M., & Rehman, K. (2021). Does Governance in Information Technology Matter When It Comes to Organizational Performance in Pakistani Public Sector Organizations? Mediating Effect of Innovation. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211016556. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016557
Berrone, P., Ricart, J. E., Duch, A. I., Bernardo, V., Salvador, J., Piedra Peña, J., & Rodríguez Planas, M. (2019). EASIER: An evaluation model for public–private partnerships contributing to the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 11(8), 2339.
Bolívar, M. P. R. (2018). Governance in smart cities: a comparison of practitioners’ perceptions and prior research. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 7(2), 1–19.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 5.
Curtis, S. (2019). Digital transformation—the silver bullet to public service improvement? Public Money & Management, 39(5), 322–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1611233
Datamora, S., & Malau, H. (2019). Penyelengaraan Mal Pelayanan Publik Untuk Masyarakat Di Kota Padang. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ilmu Administrasi Publik (JMIAP), 136–142.
Faraji, S. J., Jafari Nozar, M., & Arash, M. (2021). The analysis of smart governance scenarios of the urban culture in multicultural cities based on two concepts of “cultural intelligence” and “smart governance.” GeoJournal, 86(1), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10074-6
Farhan HR, M., & Nurmandi, A. (2022). Government Data Processing Mechanism to Support Smart City: A Bibliometric Review. In C. Stephanidis, M. Antona, S. Ntoa, & G. Salvendy (Eds.), HCI International 2022 -- Late Breaking Posters (pp. 498–506). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_63
Farhan HR, M., & Purnomo, E. P. (2023). Biofuel Successful Strategies towards Sustainable Development: A Bibliometrics Analysis. Jurnal Presipitasi: Media Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan, 1(20), 31–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v1i20.31-43
Gil, O., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., & Cantador, I. (2019). Citizen participation and the rise of digital media platforms in smart governance and smart cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 8(1), 19–34.
Giuliodori, A., Berrone, P., & Ricart, J. E. (2022). Where smart meets sustainability: The role of Smart Governance in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in cities. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 23409444221091280. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444221091281
Halid, I., & Hatu, R. A. (2022). IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE SOCIETY 5.0 ERA THROUGH DIGITAL LITERATURE CAPABILITIES OF LLDIKTI APPARATUS FOR REGION XVI. Public Policy Journal, 3(1).
Hardiyansyah, H. (2018). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Konsep, Dimensi, Indikator dan Implementasinya. Gava Media.
Haryani, T. N., & Puryatama, A. F. (2020). Pelayanan Prima Melalui Penyelenggaraan Mal Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia. Kybernan: Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan, 3(1), 40–54.
Henninger, M. (2017). Government information: Literacies, behaviours and practices. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.12.003
Herizal, H., & Purwaningsih, T. (2017). Kinerja Lembaga Perwakilan Rakyat di Daerah Otonomi Khusus Aceh dalam Melaksanakan Fungsi Legislasi. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 4(2), 294–326.
HR, M. F. (2023). Abstention in the 2020 Jambi Provincial Gubernatorial Election. Society, 11(2), 275–287.
HR, M. F., Suswanta, S., Purwaningsih, T., Wiyono, W., & Gusmi, A. D. (2023). MERIT SYSTEM: ASSESSMENT OF THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT WEBSITE. Sosiohumaniora, 25(3), 430–441.
Huda, M. N., & Purwaningsih, T. (2021). Nonalam Disaster Management Policy for The Spread of Covid-19 in The Framework of Regional Autonomy (Central Java Provincial Government Case Study). JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik), 9(2), 71–82.
Irawan, B., & Hidayat, M. N. (2021). Asistensi Pembuatan Website “Mall Pelayanan Publik” Dinas Penanaman Modal Dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu Kota Samarinda. Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(5), 1120–1128.
Jansen, A., & Ølnes, S. (2016). The nature of public e-services and their quality dimensions. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 647–657.
Kusuma, T. P., Setyadi, D. S., Andaru, I. W., & Roziqin, A. (2022). REFORMASI BIROKRASI DALAM ASPEK EFISIENSI DAN TRANSPARANSI PADA PELAYANAN BIROKRASI PEMERINTAHAN KOTA BATU. AS-SIYASAH: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 7(1), 1–9.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.
Lestari, R. P., Mutiarin, D., & Nurmandi, A. (2020). Inovasi Mall Pelayanan Publik untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Jurnal Ilmiah Tata Sejuta STIA Mataram, 6(2), 528–551.
Lexy, J. M. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Lindgren, I, & Van Veenstra, A. F. (2018). Digital government transformation: A case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation. In H. C.C. & Z. A. (Eds.), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209302
Lindgren, Ida, & Jansson, G. (2013). Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 163–172.
Lindgren, Ida, Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002
Maani, K. D. (2009). Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas dalam Pelayananan Publik. Jurnal Demokrasi, 8(1).
Male, M. (2019). PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK BERDASARKAN ASAS OTONOMI DAERAH PADA KECAMATAN GEDONG TATAAN-KABUPATEN PESAWARAN. PRANATA HUKUM, 14(1).
Mandić, A., & Kennell, J. (2021). Smart governance for heritage tourism destinations: Contextual factors and destination management organization perspectives. Tourism Management Perspectives, 39, 100862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100862
Maryati, A. (2023). KUALITAS PELAYANAN TERHADAP MASYARAKAT PADA MALL PELAYANAN PUBLIK (MPP) KABUPATEN HULU SUNGAI UTARA. Al’iidara Balad, 5(1), 1–11.
Mattsson, L.-G., & Andersson, P. (2019). Private-public interaction in public service innovation processes-business model challenges for a start-up EdTech firm. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. Revue Internationale Des Sciences Administratives, 82(2), 417–435.
Meijer, A. J., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Smart city research: Contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 647–656.
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Muliawaty, L., & Hendryawan, S. (2020). Peranan e-government dalam pelayanan publik (studi kasus: Mal pelayanan publik Kabupaten Sumedang). Kebijakan: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 11(2), 45–57.
Nesti, G. (2020). Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: Insights from four European cases. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 20–37.
Nugroho, H., & Ma’ruf, R. (2019). Elements and success factors of the electronic-based public service to the active role of the community in the Lukadesi Program in Wukirsari village government. International Conference on Democratisation in Southeast Asia (ICDeSA 2019), 211–216.
Octavia, S. D., Cikusin, Y., & Khoiron, K. (2023). Terciptanya Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Melalui Peran Profesionalisme Kerja Pegawai (Studi Kasus pada Mall Pelayanan Publik Kabupaten Tuban). Respon Publik, 17(11), 55–61.
Pratama, A. B. (2019). The landscape of public service innovation in Indonesia: A comprehensive analysis of its characteristic and trend. Innovation & Management Review, 17(1), 25–40.
Prayitno, B. (2017). Mengukur Kemampuan Keuangan Daerah Pemerintah Kota Semarang Dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah Tahun 2013-2017. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 13(3), 261–280.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2021). PERATURAN PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 89 TAHUN 2O2I (Issue 097575).
Pribadi, U., & Kim, H. J. (2021). Impacts of cultural behavior of civil servants on citizens’ satisfaction: A survey on licensing services of Indonesian local government agencies. Journal of Public Affairs, 2021(2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2662
Ramdansyah, N., Sholahuddin, A., & Sadhana, K. (2022). Utilization of the Integrated Service Application System [SIAPEL] in Civil Service Retirement Administration Services: Study of Employment Policy Implementation based on Malang Regency Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of . International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities (IJRSS) ISSN: 2582-6220, DOI: 10.47505/IJRSS, 3(1), 1–12.
Ramírez, Y., & Tejada, Á. (2019). Digital transparency and public accountability in Spanish universities in online media. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
Ranchod, R. (2020). The data-technology nexus in South African secondary cities: The challenges to smart governance. Urban Studies, 57(16), 3281–3298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019896974
Rangkasa, E. (2017). Penyelenggaraan otonomi daerah guna mewujudkan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1).
Ricart, J. E., & Berrone, P. (2017). La economía colaborativa en las ciudades. Harvard Deusto Business Review, 265, 50–64.
Royo, S., Yetano, A., & García-Lacalle, J. (2019). Accountability Styles in State-Owned enterprises: The good, the bad, the ugly... and the pretty: Estilos de rendición de cuentas en empresas públicas: el bueno, el malo, el feo... y la guapa. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 22(2), 156–170.
Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81, 1–23.
Schedler, K., Guenduez, A. A., & Frischknecht, R. (2019). How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government. Information Polity, 24(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180095
Sønderskov, M., Rønning, R., & Magnussen, S. (2022). Hybrid stimulations and perversions in public service innovation. Public Policy and Administration, 37(3), 363–384.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
Suryana, O. (2019). Analisis Survei Kepuasan Masyarakat Pada Mal Pelayanan Publik (MPP) Kota Batam. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 9(1), 56–70.
Suyanto, B. (2015). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Prenada Media.
Tomor, Z. (2020). Smart Governance in Practice. Utrecht University.
Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., & Geertman, S. (2019). Smart governance for sustainable cities: findings from a systematic literature review. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(4), 3–27.
Tomor, Z., Przeybilovicz, E., & Leleux, C. (2021). Smart governance in institutional context: An in-depth analysis of Glasgow, Utrecht, and Curitiba. Cities, 114, 103195.
Umam, U., & Adianto, A. (2020). Efektivitas Mal Pelayanan Publik (MPP) Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Humaniora: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi Dan Hukum, 4(1), 160–165.
Umar, A., Amrin, Madani, M., Farida, U., Yusriadi, Y., Tamsa, H., Bahtiar, Ansar, Yahya, M., Nurnaningsih, Alam, S., Gunawan, H., Darwis, Sahabuddin, C., Jamaluddin, Misbahuddin, Elpisah, Akbar, Z., Sakkir, G., … Misnawati, M. (2019). One-stop service policy as a bureaucratic reform in Indonesia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(2).
Vydra, S., & Klievink, B. (2019). Techno-optimism and policy-pessimism in the public sector big data debate. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101383.
Wicaksono, K. W. (2019). Transforming The Spirit Of New Public Service Into Public Management Reform In Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v2i1.20190
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Farhan HR, Titin Purwaningsih (Author); Rahmi Hidayati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The DiA journal allows authors to retain the copyright of their papers without limitation. Authors may grant publishers non-exclusive publishing rights to publish articles. Granting first publishing rights to publishers also qualifies as unlimited copyright (because there are no restrictions imposed by publishers on author copyright).