Legal Certainty in the Decisions of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court: A Case Study of Chairman Anwar Usman's Ruling
Abstract
The existence of the Constitutional Court in the life of the nation and state is in order to guarantee and prove the existence of positive law, especially laws, so that these laws remain in accordance with the constitution so that later the constitutional rights of citizens can be maintained. The purpose of this research is as evaluation material and learning material for law enforcers, students and other parties. This type of research is included in the juridical-normative category, namely research carried out by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and regulations that are appropriate and related to the object of research. The Constitutional Court decision that has been issued against Anwar Usman cannot be challenged in the State Administrative Court because the Constitutional Court's decision is not a state administrative decision so it does not fall within the scope of what can be litigated in the state administrative court. Another reason that could be the basis for approval or inaccuracy of the State Administrative Court's lawsuit in relation to the Constitutional Court's decision is related to the ad hoc nature inherent in the Constitutional Court. Compliance with ethical standards in the decision-making process in law enforcement agencies is a crucial element in maintaining the trust and reputation of state administration in the eyes of the public. The presence of ethical standards in the Constitutional Court is considered the basis for upholding constitutional principles which are moral and behavioral guidelines for all members of the judiciary.
Downloads
References
Aritonang, Dinoroy M. “Peranan Dan Problematika Mahkamah Konstitusi (Mk) Dalam Menjalankan Fungsi Dan Kewenangannya The Role And Problems Of Constitutional Court Of Indonesia In Running Its Function And Authority.” Ilmu Administrasi 10, No. 3 (2013): 373–89.
Bintang, D, M Roido, And G Juliana. “Pelanggaran Kode Etik: Pelanggaran Kode Etik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anwar Usman Selaku Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora 1, No. 2 (2023): 48.
Hardianto, Hanif, Sri Wahyu Krida Sakti, And Meliza Meliza. “Masalah Batas Usia Calon Presiden Dan Calon Wakil Presiden: Studi Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mk No. 90 90/Puu-Xxi/2023.” Jurnal Supremasi 14 (2024): 15–27. Https://Doi.Org/10.35457/Supremasi.V14i1.3313.
Intansari, Laila, And Samsul Arifin. “Konsekuensi Pelanggaran Kode Etik Hakim Mk Terhadap Berlakunya Putusan Mk Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023” 4, No. 90 (2024): 1–16.
Lismanida, And Zainal Arifin. “Understanding The Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number 90/Puu-Xxi/2023 In The Perspective Of Civil Law And Common Law Perspectives.” International Journal Of Accounting, Management, Economics And Social Sciences (Ijamesc) 1, No. 6 (2023): 1005–13. Https://Doi.Org/10.61990/Ijamesc.V1i6.129.
Mayandri Suzarman. “Tinjauan Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial.” Universitas Islam Riau Pekanbaru, 2019.
Mellani Mugia Adhita. “Independensi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Uu Yang Memuat Conflict Of Interest Pada Putusan Mk No 90/Puu-Xxi/2023,” No. 90 (2023): 1–17. Https://Doi.Org/10.11111/Nusantara.Xxxxxxx.
Novitalia, Khairani Hasibuan, And Budi Aspani. “Kredibilitas Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Putusan Mk Nomor: 90/Puu-Xxi/2023.” Solusi 22, No. 1 (2024): 24–35.
Perdana Aditya, And Imam Muhammad. “Judisialisasi Politik Dalam Putusan Mk Terkait Batas Usia Cawapres Dalam Pilpres 2024.” Jurnal Pengawasan Pemilu 4 (2024): 69–92.
Permadi, Haru & Oppy Pramudya Wisnu Wardhana. “Konflik Kepentingan Dalam Putusan Mk Nomor 90/Puu/Xxi/2023.” Maksigama 17, No. 2 (2023): 113–29. Https://Maksigama.Wisnuwardhana.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Maksigama/Article/View/149.
Prayatno, Cecep, Tri Susilowati, And Korespondensi Penulis. “Pemilihan Umum Serentak Tahun 2024 Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.” Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 1, No. 4 (2023): 168–80. Https://Doi.Org/10.51903/Perkara.V1i4.
Ramadan, Wahyu Aji, Irma Aulia Pertiwi Nusantara, And Tanti Mitasari. “Reformulasi Pengawasan Mahkamah Konstitusi Demi Meningkatkan Efektivitas Penegakan Kode Etik Hakim Konstitusi.” Jurnal Studia Legalia 3, No. 02 (2022): 21–43. Https://Doi.Org/10.61084/Jsl.V3i02.29.
Sumadi, Ahmad Fadlil. “Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 8, No. 5 (2016): 631. Https://Doi.Org/10.31078/Jk851.
Suparto. “Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 05 / Puu- Iv / 2006 Tentang Pengujian Undang Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial.” Pagaruyang Law Journal 2, No. 2 (2019): 200–220.
Suzeeta, Nala Syandhira, And Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba. “Pelanggaran Kode Etik Oleh Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023.” Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, No. 11 (2023): 256. Https://Doi.Org/10.5281/Zenodo.10252190.
Wijayanti, Winda. “Eksistensi Undang-Undang Sebagai Produk Hukum Dalam Pemenuhan Keadilan Bagi Rakyat (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/Puu-X/2012).” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, No. 1 (2016): 179. Https://Doi.Org/10.31078/Jk1018.
Zuhro Nuridahwati. “Karakter Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Melaksanakan Kewenangan Sesuai Pasal 24c Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik.” Read Kertha 03, No. 1 (2020): 94–108. Http://Www.Ejournal.Universitasmahendradatta.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Raadkertha/Article/View/171/168.
Zulqarnain, Cantika Dhea Marshanda, Nararya Salsabila Zamri, And Raesa Mahardika. “Analisis Pelanggaran Kode Etik Dalam Kasus Pemberhentian Ketua Mk Anwar Usman Terkait Putusan Batas Usia Capres Dan Cawapres Pada Pemilu 2024.” Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora 1, No. 2 (2023): 85–94.
Authors who publish with Mimbar Keadilan agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
