ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS LATAR HISTORIS DALAM PIDATO KENEGARAAN PRESIDEN SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO

  • * Jupriono

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The focus of this study is explicit and implicit meanings of historical setting of Presiden SBY state speech discourse during 2004-2010. By perspective of critical discourse analysis van Dijk, it yields foundings as follows. Presiden SBY state speech maximally has made use of historical discourse setting to lead Indonesian public understanding. In building positive self image, Presiden SBY expresses explicitly life dynamic of politic, economy, law, social during the first ten (10) years of reformation era.Presiden SBY leads public perception implicitly that he is high ligitimated Presiden as democratic campaign product. Besides that, SBY also constructs publicunderstandingthat he gives contribution to reveal the development of Indonesian country. SBY is the more smart Presiden who exlpoits state speech as media of imagery politic.

 

Keywords: latar historis, politik pencitraan, makna eksplisit, persepsi implisit, analisis wacana kritis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fairclough, N. 2008.“Critical Linguisticsâ€.International Encyclopedia of Linguistics.www.mywire.com/a/Intl-Enc-Linguistics/Critical-Linguistics/9460312/

Fowler, R. 1996.“On Critical Linguisticsâ€. C.R. Caldas-Coulthard& M. Coulthard (ed.), Text and Practices: Reading in Critical Discourse Analysis. London-New York: Routledge. Hal.1-14.

Haryatmoko. 2003. “LandasanTeoretisGerakanSosialMenurut Pierre Bourdieu: MenyingkapKepalsuanBudayaPenguasaâ€. Basis 52(11-12), Nov.-Des.: 4-23.

Haryatmoko. 2010. DominasiPenuhMuslihat: AkarKekerasandanDiskriminasi. Jakarta: PT GramediaPustakaUtama.

Jupriono, D., Sudarwati, Anik C. Rahayu, A. Andayani. 2009. “PidatoKenegaraanPresiden SBY dalamPerspektifAnalisisWacanaKritisâ€. LaporanPenelitian. DP2M, DitjenDikti, Depdiknas, TahunAnggaran 2009.

Jupriono, D. 2010. “PolitikPencitraanPresiden SBY melaluiBentukKalimat: TinjauanLinguistikKritisâ€. MakalahPelatihanPenulisanArtikelJurnalTerakreditasiNasional, DP2M, DitjenDikti, Depdiknas.

Littlejohn, S.W. 1996. Theories of Human Communication. Ed. III. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Sara Mills. 1997. Discourse. London & New York: Routledge

Sulistiyo, H. 2008. “Waspadai Politik Pencitraanâ€. www.inilah.com/berita/2008/05/26/30030/waspadai-politik/

Sumarwan, A. 2006. “MenyingkapGramatikaWacanaOrdeBaruâ€. Basis 55(03-04) Maret—April: 40-51.

Thurlow, C. 2007. “Critical Linguistics: The Power of Language in Everyday Lifeâ€. http://faculty. washington.edu/ thurlow/guestlectures/osher1.pdf

vanDijk, T.A. 2001. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysisâ€. M. Wetherel, S. Taylor, S. Yates (ed.). Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Hal. 300-317

vanDijk, T.A. 2005. “Contextual Knowledge Management in Discourse Production: A CDA Perspectiveâ€, hal.71-100 dlm.Wodak, R. & P. Chilton (ed.). 2005. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Wodak, R. 1996. Disorders of Discourse. London & New York: Longman.

Published
2010-09-02
How to Cite
1.
Jupriono *. ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS LATAR HISTORIS DALAM PIDATO KENEGARAAN PRESIDEN SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO. parafrase [Internet]. 2Sep.2010 [cited 3Jul.2024];10(02). Available from: https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/parafrase/article/view/174
Section
Articles