APLIKASI TEORI STRUKTURALISME GENETIK, FEMINISME, SASTRA & POLITIK, TEORI HEGEMONI, RESEPSI SASTRA DALAM PENELITIAN MAHASISWA

Authors

  • Mateus Rudi Supsiadji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/parafrase.v11i01.181

Abstract

Abstract. This article discusses the weaknesses of student’s comprehension on theories that they were applying on their research. The result of the analysis were: 1) in applying genetic structuralism the students did not relate the structure of a literary work with the structure of the society on the issue; 2) they did not state clearly their stand points in applying feminist criticism; 3) in applying the political-ideology criticism, the students explained nothing on the author’s strategies to bring out his or her political-ideology; 4) in their applying theory of hegemony, the students were unclearly to choose the interested perspectives; 5) the students were not appropriately to choose the audience of which they addressed, and did not clearly state “the horazone of the reader’s expectationâ€, “open spaceâ€, ; 6) the students did not clearly discussed the text norms, reader’s knowledge and reading experiences, the tensions appearing between fiction and reality in a literary work in applying redear’s reception. Each theory has its own principle characteristics in approaching a literary work.

 

Key words: mastering theories, applying theories, sociological approach, feminism, reader’s reception

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aaker, David A (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York : The Free Press.

Assael, H. (1995), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, 5th Ed, Cincinnati, OH: South Western College Publishing.

Azwar, Saifuddin. (1997), Reliabilitas dan Validitas, Ed 3, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Baumgartner, Hans and Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp (1996), “Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior: Conceptualization and Measurement,†International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, Forthcoming.

Bagozzi. R. P. And P. R. Warshaw (1990), “Trying to Consume,†Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp. 127-140.

Bhote, Keki R. (1995), “It’s Customer Loyalty Stupid : Nuturing and Measuring What Really Matters,†National Productivity Review, Summer.

Boulding, W; A. Klra; R. Staelin; and V. A. Zeithaml (1993), “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions,†Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30 (February), pp. 7-27.

Chernev, Alex (1997), “The Effect of Common Features on Brand Choice: Moderating Role of Attribute Importance,†Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, March, pp. 304-311.

Cooper, Donald R. and C. William Emory. (1995), Business Research Methods, 5th Ed, Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,†Psychometrika, Vol. 16, pp. 297-334.

Deighton, John; Carolinee M. Henderson; and Scott A. Neslin (1994), “The Effects of Advertising on Brand Switching and Repeat Purchasing,†Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, February, pp. 28-43.

Downloads

Published

2011-02-01

How to Cite

1.
Supsiadji MR. APLIKASI TEORI STRUKTURALISME GENETIK, FEMINISME, SASTRA & POLITIK, TEORI HEGEMONI, RESEPSI SASTRA DALAM PENELITIAN MAHASISWA. parafrase [Internet]. 2011Feb.1 [cited 2026Jan.12];11(01). Available from: https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/parafrase/article/view/181

Issue

Section

Articles