Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Instruksi Guru yang Mengembangkan Strategi Belajar Regulasi Diri
Abstract
Abstract
Many studies highlighted the importance of self-regulation on academic achievement. Otherwise, not all students have the opportunity to develop their self-regulation optimally. As a result, knowing their perception of how the classroom instruction supports their self-regulation is essential. Search for qualitative studies on database electronic (Proquest, Sciencedirect, and Scopus) done. Selected studies were analyzed into the main findings. Discussion about how participant in the study perceive instruction based on the approach of Reigeluth and Carr Chelmann (2009) supported the use of self-regulation strategies. Seven studies were identified to be included. A study had middle school students as participants, while six other studies had college students. From those two levels of education, instructions that facilitated the use of self-regulation strategies are instruction problem, simulation, and discussion approach. Students perceived those approach as instructions that supported self-regulation because they had collaborative learning. Furthermore, students perceived by using technology and computer-based learning, they are helped to show their performance and easier to get feedback from friends and facilitators which facilitated the use of self-regulation strategies.
Keywords: self-regulation, classroom instruction, students’ perception, qualitative studies
Abstrak
Banyak studi telah menggarisbawahi pentingnya hubungan antara regulasi diri dan prestasi akademik. Namun demikian, tidak semua siswa dapat mengembangkan regulasi dirinya secara optimal. Oleh karena itu, perlu diketahui persepsi siswa akan instruksi kelas yang mendukung adanya regulasi diri. Pencarian studi kualitatif pada database elektronik (Proquest, Sciencedirect, dan Scopus) dilakukan. Studi terpilih dianalisis lebih dalam untuk dimasukan ke dalam hasil utama. Pembahasan diutamakan bagaimana partisipan dalam studi mempersepsikan instruksi berdasarkan pendekatan menurut Reigeluth dan Carr-Chelmann (2009) untuk mengedepankan penggunaan strategi regulasi diri. Terdapat tujuh studi yang membahas tentang persepsi siswa akan instruksi yang mendukung strategi regulasi diri. Satu diantaranya memiliki partisipan siswa SMP sementara enam lainnya merupakan mahasiswa. Dari kedua jenjang tersebut, instruksi yang dirasakan siswa dapat mempengaruhi penggunaan strategi regulasi diri adalah instruksi berdasarkan pendekatan masalah, simulasi, dan diskusi. Pada ketiga instruksi tersebut, siswa merasa terfasilitasi penggunaan strategi regulasi dirinya karena adanya pembelajaran yang kolaboratif. Selain itu, dalam mengembangkan regulasi diri, siswa merasa konteks pembelajaran berbasis teknologi dan komputer, dapat membantu mereka menunjukkan kemampuan dan mendapatkan umpan balik dari teman maupun fasilitator, yang mana hal tersebut penting untuk regulasi dirinya.
Kata Kunci: regulasi diri, instruksi kelas, persepsi siswa, studi kualitatif
Downloads
References
Andrade, H., Wang, X., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Efficacy for Writing Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment and Self-Efficacy for Writing.
Anzola, D., & RodrÃguez-Cárdenas, D. (2018). A model of cultural transmission by direct instruction: An exercise on replication and extension. Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.07.019
Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., & Burkett, C. (2010). Self-regulated learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with metacognitive tools. In AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report (pp. 225–247). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_11
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Selfâ€regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199–231.
Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2012). Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FUL-VEFGGFMC
Çakıroğlu, Ü., & Öztürk, M. (2017). Flipped Classroom with Problem Based Activities: Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 337–349. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.337
Cho, K. K., Marjadi, B., Langendyk, V., & Hu, W. (2017). Medical student changes in self-regulated learning during the transition to the clinical environment. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0902-7
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-Regulation Empowerment Program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10177
Conover, K., & Daiute, C. (2017). The process of self-regulation in adolescentsA narrative approach. Journal of Adolescence, 57, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.03.006
Cooper, J. E., Horn, S., & Strahan, D. B. (2005). “ If Only They Would Do Their Homework :†Promoting Self-Regulation in High Sch ... The High School Journal, 88(3), 10–25.
Demetriou, A. (2000). Organization and development of self-understanding and self-regulation: Toward a general theory. In Boekaerts, I. M; Pintrich, P. R; Zeidner, M (Ed.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 101–129). New York: Academic Press.
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?. A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
Duckworth, K., Akerman, R., & Macgregor, A. (2016). Self-regulated learning: A literature review.
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., … Brooks-Gunn, J. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428.
Froyd, J., & Simpson, N. (2010). Student-Centered Learning Addressing Faculty Questions about Student-centered Learning What is meant by Student-centered Learning (SCL)? (1997), 11. Retrieved from http://ccliconference.org/files/2010/03/Froyd_Stu-CenteredLearning.pdf
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ff1BDwAAQBAJ
Hilden, K. R., & Pressley, M. (2007). Self-regulation through transactional strategies instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560600837651
Hodges, L. C., & Stanton, K. (2007). Translating comments on student evaluations into the language of learning. Innovative Higher Education, 31(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9027-3
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Koivuniemi, M. (2016). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 42, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006
Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40(4), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9209-6
Kareshki, H. (2011). Relations among perceptions of classroom activities and self-regulating learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.050
Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Büttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2010). Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3
Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing Self-Regulatory Processes Among Novice, Non-Expert, and Expert Volleyball Players: A Microanalytic Study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200252907761
Koivuniemi, M., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2018). Teacher education students’ strategic activities in challenging collaborative learning situations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 19(May), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.05.002
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Kreber, C., Castleden, H., Erfani, N., & Wright, T. (2005). Self-regulated learning about university teaching: An exploratory study. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251052000305543
Lee, H. S., & Anderson, J. R. (2013). Student Learning: What Has Instruction Got to Do With It? Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143833
Lee, L., Lajoie, S. P., Poitras, E. G., Nkangu, M., & Doleck, T. (2017). Co-regulation and knowledge construction in an online synchronous problem based learning setting. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1623–1650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9509-6
Lee, S. (2014). Design of a learner-directed e-learning model. PQDT - UK & Ireland, (November), 1. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1687708115?accountid=10673%0Ahttp://openurl.ac.uk/redirect/athens:edu/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Global&a
Lin-Siegler, X., Dweck, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2016). Introduction: Instructional interventions that motivate classroom learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000124
Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
McClelland, M. M., Morrison, F. J., & Holmes, D. L. (2000). Children at risk for early academic problems: The role of learning-related social skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(3), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(00)00069-7
McGuire, C. H., Solomon, L. M., & Bashook, P. G. (1976). Construction and use of written simulations. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=IjomAQAAIAAJ
Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3701_3
Michailidis, N., Kapravelos, E., & Tsiatsos, T. (2018). Interaction Analysis for supporting students’ self-regulation during blogbased CSCL activities. Educational Technology and Society, 21(1), 37–47.
Moos, D. C., & Ringdal, A. (2012). Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom: A Literature Review on the Teacher’s Role. Education Research International, 2012, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/423284
Muianga, X., Klomsri, T., Tedre, M., & Mutimucuio, I. (2018). From Teacher-Oriented to Student-Centred Learning: Developing an ICT-Supported Learning Approach at the Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 46–54. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2025353640?pq-origsite=gscholar
Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2006). A breed apart? A comparison of secondary and university teachers’ perspectives on self-regulated learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600600832338
Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). TeorÃas de autorregulación educativa: una comparación y reflexión teórica. Psicologia Educativa, 20(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.05.002
Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226
Pauli, C., Reusser, K., & Grob, U. (2007). Teaching for understanding and/or self-regulated learning? A video-based analysis of reform-oriented mathematics instruction in Switzerland. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(5), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.10.004
Perry, N. E., & VandeKamp, K. J. O. (2000). Creating classroom contexts that support young children’s development of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(7–8), 821–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00052-5
Ponitz, C. C., McClelland, M. M., Matthews, J. S., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). A Structured Observation of Behavioral Self-Regulation and Its Contribution to Kindergarten Outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015365
Raffaelli, M., Crockett, L. J., & Shen, Y. L. (2005). Developmental stability and change in self-regulation from childhood to adolescence. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.166.1.54-76
Reigeluth, C M & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume III: Building a Common Knowledge Base (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Vc2LAgAAQBAJ
Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=HFxtMAEACAAJ
Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Oppezzo, M. A., & Chin, D. B. (2011). Practicing Versus Inventing With Contrasting Cases: The Effects of Telling First on Learning and Transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025140
Seker, M. (2016). Scenario-Based Instruction Design as a Tool to Promote Self-Regulated Language Learning Strategies. SAGE Open, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016684175
Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2008). Flexibility in problem solving: The case of equation solving. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.018
Topping, K. (2006). Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility. Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4
Turner, J. (1995). turner_1995_The Influence of Classroom Contexts on Literacy Motivation.pdf. Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 30, pp. 410–441.
Varutharaju, E., & Ratnavadive, N. (2014). Skills Through Clinical Simulation. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11, 75–100.
Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/749186
Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9
Woolfolk Hoy, A., Demerath, P., & Pape, S. (2002). Teaching adolescents: Engaging developing selves: General issues in the education of adolescents. In F. P. Tim Urdan (Ed.), Adolescence and education, (pp. 119–169). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=4fknDwAAQBAJ
Yang, X., Kuo, L. J., Ji, X., & McTigue, E. (2018). A critical examination of the relationship among research, theory, and practice: Technology and reading instruction. Computers and Education, 125(March), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.009
Zhao, K., & Zheng, Y. (2014). Chinese Business English Students’ Epistemological Beliefs, Self-Regulated Strategies, and Collaboration in Project-Based Learning. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0103-z
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Skinner, E. A. (2011). The development of coping across childhood and adolescence: An integrative review and critique of research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410384923
The author who will publish the manuscript at Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-prints sites or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work
