Mindset dan task value: Dapatkah memprediksi kinerja siswa Sekolah Dasar (SD) pada bidang matematika?
Abstract
Abstract
The mathematical ability of Indonesian students is still lacking, especially when working on problems that require reasoning. Task value (which consists of intrinsic and attainment/utility values) and growth mindset were considered as factors that can influence student performance in performing complex tasks such as mathematics. A hypothesis formulated based on the purpose of this study as there is an effect of intrinsic value, attainment/utility value, and mindset on elementary student performance in mathematics. The variables in this study were measured by: 1) Subjective Task Value scale (? intrinsic value = 0.87; ? attainment / utility value = 0.79); 2) Implicit Theories of Intelligence scale for mindset (? = 0.84), and 3) mathematical tests (? = 0.84). The subjects of this study were 371 5th grade students in five schools in Jakarta selected by convenience sampling technique. Data processed with Multiple Regression techniques using IBM SPSS 22 for Windows. The analysis showed that the mindset had a greater role than the intrinsic value in predicting mathematical abilities. Also, the attainment/utility value did not significantly predict the performance of 5th-grade students.
Keywords: Elementary School Students; Mathematics; Mindset; Task Value.
Abstrak
Tingkat kemampuan matematika para siswa Indonesia pada umumnya masih tergolong kurang, terutama saat mengerjakan soal yang membutuhkan penalaran. Task value (yang terdiri dari intrinsic dan attainment/utility value) dan growth mindset dipertimbangkan sebagai faktor-faktor yang dapat memengaruhi kinerja siswa dalam mengerjakan tugas rumit seperti matematika. Tujuan penelitian ini dituangkan dalam suatu hipotesis yaitu terdapat pengaruh skor intrinsic value, attainment/utility value, dan mindset terhadap kinerja siswa SD dalam matematika. Variabel-variabel dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan: 1) skala Subjective Task Value (? intrinsic value = 0,87; ? attainment/utility value = 0,79); 2) skala Implicit Theories of Intelligence untuk mindset (?=0,84), dan 3) tes matematika (?=0,72). Subjek penelitian ini adalah 371 siswa kelas 5 SD pada lima sekolah di Jakarta yang dipilih dengan teknik convenience sampling. Data diolah dengan teknik Multiple Regression menggunakan IBM SPSS 22 for Windows. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa mindset memiliki peranan yang lebih besar daripada intrinsic value dalam memprediksi kemampuan matematika. Selain itu, attainment/utility value tidak secara signifikan memprediksi kinerja siswa kelas 5 SD.
Kata kunci: Matematika; Mindset; Siswa SD; Task Value.
Downloads
References
Abramovich, S., Grinshpan, A. Z., & Milligan, D. L. (2019). Teaching mathematics through concept motivation and action learning. Education Research International, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3745406
Bedford, S. (2017). Growth mindset and motivation: a study into secondary school science learning. Research Papers in Education, 32(4), 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1318809
Boaler, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mathematical mindsets. San Fransisco: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Optimizing Students’ Motivation in the Era of Testing and Pressure: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. In W. C. Liu, J. C. K. W. Wang, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Building Autonomous Learners (pp. 9–30). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-0
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. New York: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.
Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2017). Mindsets: their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed., pp. 135–154). New York: The Guilford Press.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
Fisher, C. B. (2005). Deception research involving children: Ethical practices and paradoxes. Ethics and Behavior, 15(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1503_7
François, K. (2007). The untouchable and frightening status of mathematics. In K. François & J. P. Van Bendegem (Eds.), Philosophical Dimensions in Mathematics Education (pp. 13–40). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2017). The Origins of Children’s Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal. Child Development, 88(6), 1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12955
Hoang, T. V. (2018). Growth Mindset and Task Value Interventions. Texas University.
Huang, X., Zhang, J., & Hudson, L. (2019). Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: the gender moderating effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing Interest and Performance With a Utility Value Intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019506
Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Critical Maths for Innovative Societies. In Critical Maths for Innovative Societies. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264223561-en
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics. Retrieved from http://timss2015.org/timss-2015/science/student-achievement/distribution-of-science-achievement/
Musu-Gillette, L. E., Wigfield, A., Harring, J. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2015). Trajectories of change in students’ self-concepts of ability and values in math and college major choice. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(4), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1057161
Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2012). Development Through Life (11th ed.). Belmont CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Nizam. (2016). Ringkasan Hasil-hasil Asesmen Belajar Dari Hasil UN, PISA, TIMSS, INAP. In Seminar Puspendik 2016. Retrieved from http://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/seminar/
Nurmi, J. E., & Aunola, K. (2005). Task-motivation during the first school years: A person-oriented approach to longitudinal data. Learning and Instruction, 15(2 SPEC. ISS.), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.009
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-Student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions. In S. L. Christenson, C. Wylie, & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 365–386). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Roman, H. T. (2004). Why Math Is So Important. Tech Directions, 63(10), 16–17.
Sembiring, R. K., Hadi, S., & Dolk, M. (2008). Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(6), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0125-9
Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi siswa pada pelajaran matematika: studi pendahuluan pada siswa yang menyenangi game. In Y. W. Mandaya & R. Arjanggi (Eds.), Prosiding Temu Ilmiah X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia (pp. 224–232). Retrieved from http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ippi/article/view/2193
Tibbetts, Y., Canning, E. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Academic Motivation and Performance: Task Value Interventions. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26078-9
Valerio, K. (2012). Intrinsic motivaiton in the classroom. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2(1), 30.
Whitley, B. E., & Kite, M. E. (2013). Bernard E. Whitley Jr., Mary E. Kite-Principles of Research in Behavioral Science-Routledge (2012) (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., Freedman-Doan, C., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Arbreton, A. J. A., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Change in Children’s Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values Across the Elementary School Years: A 3-Year Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451
Wigfield, A., Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Achievement Values: Interactions, Interventions, and Future Directions. In D. S. Y. Andrew J. Elliot, Carol S. Dweck (Ed.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., … Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037637
The author who will publish the manuscript at Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-prints sites or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work
