Bagaimana self-efficacy calon guru siswa dengan disabilitas di sekolah inklusi?: Studi di berbagai Perguruan Tinggi
Abstract
Abstract
The prospective teacher must have both academic and competency readiness. Besides, they must have self-efficacy on their own ability to later teach in schools, especially inclusive schools. However, until now research that discusses how Prospective teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching students with disabilities is still very limited and unclear. The purpose of this study is to reveal the self-efficacy profile of prospective teachers in teaching students with disabilities in inclusive schools as seen in three sub-constructs namely using inclusive instruction, collaboration, and managing behavior. The type of research is a survey. The population is the students of the Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program with a sample of 234 people. The data were collected using a scale of self-efficacy for prospective teachers with alpha coefficient 0,983. The data analyzed using descriptive statistics. In general, the self-efficacy of prospective teachers is in the moderate category. Based on the three sub-constructs of self-efficacy, prospective teachers in using inclusive instructional, collaboration, and managing behavior also are in a medium category. Implications may be reviewed further by the Ministry of Higher Education and University.
Key Words: Prospective Teachers; Collaboration; Managing Behavior; Self-Efficacy; Using Inclusive Instruction
Abstrak
Calon guru harus mempunyai kesiapan baik akademik maupun kompetensi sebelum mengajar di sekolah. Selain itu, calon guru harus mempunyai self-efficacy atas kemampuannya sendiri untuk nantinya mengajar di sekolah terutama sekolah inklusi. Namun, hingga kini penelitian mengenai bagaimana self-efficacy calon guru untuk mengajar siswa dengan disabilitas masih sangat terbatas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan gambaran self-efficacy calon guru untuk mengajar siswa dengan disabilitas di sekolah inklusi yang dilihat pada tiga sub konstruk yaitu using inclusive instructional, collaboration, dan managing behavior. Metode penelitian adalah survei dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi penelitian adalah mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar dengan partisipan sebanyak 234 orang. Pengumpulan data menggunakan skala self-efficacy calon guru dengan koefisien alpha 0,983. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Secara umum self-efficacy calon guru berada pada kategori sedang. Berdasarkan ketiga sub-konstruk self-efficacy calon guru yaitu dalam using inclusive instructional, collaboration, dan managing behavior juga memiliki kategori sedang. Implikasi dapat dikaji lebih lanjut oleh Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi dan Universitas.
Kata Kunci: Calon Guru; Kerja Sama; Manajemen Perilaku; Self-Efficacy; Pembelajaran Inklusif
Downloads
References
Alnahdi, G. H. (2019). Are we ready for inclusion? Teachers’ self-efficacy for inclusive education in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Disability, Development, & Education, 33(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643YYxxxxxxxx
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy_ The Exercise of Control. https://doi.org/10.1007
Bandura, A. (2009). Self-efficacy in changing societies. https://doi.org/10.1109/EVER.2017.7935960
Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (2013). Method for effective teaching: Meeting the needs of All students (7 Th). United States: Pearson.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (2011). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(1999), 1188–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.261
Department of Education. National Curriculum Statement (NCS) curriculum assessment policy statement: Guidelines for responding to learner diversity in the classroom through curriculum and assessment policy statements. , (2011).
Ekins, A., Savolainen, H., & Engelbrecht, P. (2016). An analysis of English teachers’ self-efficacy in relation to SEN and disability and its implications in a changing SEN policy context. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1141510
Forlin, C. (2014). Measuring inclusive education. United Kingdom: Emerald Group.
Forlin, C., Sharma, U., & Loreman, T. (2014). Predictors of improved teaching efficacy following basic training for inclusion in Hong Kong. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(7), 718–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.819941
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2016). Personality : classic theories and modern research (6th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc.
Hecht, P., Aiello, P., Pace, E. M., & Sibilio, M. (2017). Attitudes and teacher efficacy among Italian and Austrian teachers: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Research on Education and Teaching, 15(1), 269–282.
Hornby, G. (2015). Inclusive special education: Development of a new theory for the education of children with special educational needs and disabilities. British Journal of Special Education, 42(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12101
Jalanidhi, D. G. (2017). Identifikasi hambatan-hambatan guru dalam pembelajaran di sekolah inklusif SD Negeri 2 Petir Piyungan Bantul. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Kim, K. R., & Seo, E. H. (2018). The relationship between teacher efficacy and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(4), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6554
Klassen, R. M. (2004). Optimism and realism: A review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590344000330
Künsting, J., Neuber, V., & Lipowsky, F. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy as a long-term predictor of instructional quality in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0272-7
Kustawan, D. (2013). manajemen Pendidikan Inklusi. Jakarta: Luxima Metro Media.
Kuyini, A. B., Desai, I. (Ishwar), & Sharma, U. (2018). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes and concerns about implementing inclusive education in Ghana. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1544298
Loreman, T., Sharma, U., & Forlin, C. (2013). Do Pre-service Teachers Feel Ready to Teach in Inclusive Classrooms? A Four Country Study of Teaching Self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n1.10
Malinen, O. P., Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Xu, J., Nel, M., Nel, N., & Tlale, D. (2013). Exploring teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices in three diverse countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.004
Martella, R. C., Nelson, J. R., Marchand-Martella, N. E., & O’Reilly, M. (2012). Comprehensive Behavior Management: Individualized, Classroom, and Schoolwide Approaches. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243931
Martínez, Y. M., & Porter, G. L. (2018). Planning for all students: promoting inclusive instruction. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1544301
Mitchell, D. (2014). What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Monteiro, E., Kuok, A. C. H., Correia, A. M., Forlin, C., & Teixeira, V. (2019). Perceived efficacy of teachers in Macao and their alacrity to engage with inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1514762
Montgomery, A., & Mirenda, P. (2014). Teacher’s self-efficacy, sentiments, attitudes, and concerns about inclusion of students with developmental disabilities. Exceptionality Education International, 24(1), 18–32. Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0071913
Ngalimun, Fauzi, M., & Salabi, A. (2016). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran (Revisi). Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
Ni’matuzahroh, & Nurhamida, Y. (2016). Individu berkebutuhan khusus dan pendidikan inklusi. Malang: UMM Press.
Ozokcu, O. (2018). Investigating Preschool Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Inclusion Practices in Turkey. International Education Studies, 11(9), 79. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n9p79
Özokcu, O. (2018). The relationship between teacher attitude and self-efficacy for inclusive practices in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3), 6. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.3034
Peebles, J. L., & Mendaglio, S. (2014). The impact of direct experience on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(12), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.899635
Rubie-Davies, C. M., Stephens, J. M., & Watson, P. (2015). The Routledge International Handbook Of Social Psychology Of The Classroom. In and P. W. Christine M. Rubie-Davies, Jason M. Stephens (Ed.), the Routledge International Handbook of Social Psychology of the Classroom (pp. 350–360). https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2010.528257
Šafránková, A., & Hrbá?ková, K. (2016). Teacher Self-Efficacy within the Context of Socially Disadvantaged Pupils’ Education. Ssrn, 4(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2888532
Sanjeev, K., & Kumar, K. (2007). Inclusive Education in India. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 2(2), 1–15.
Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M., & Malinen, O. P. (2012). Understanding teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy in inclusive education: Implications for pre-service and in-service teacher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.613603
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (6th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Schwab, S. (2019). Teachers’ student-specific self-efficacy in relation to teacher and student variables. Educational Psychology, 39(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1516861
Schwab, S., Hellmich, F., & Görel, G. (2017). Self-efficacy of prospective Austrian and German primary school teachers regarding the implementation of inclusive education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 17(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12379
Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2012). Exploring Pre-Service Teachers ’ Perceived Teaching-Efficacy, Attitudes and Concerns About Inclusive Education in Bangladesh. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 8(2), 1–20.
Sharma, U., & Forlin, C. (2007). What concerns pre-service teachers about inclusive education: An international viewpoint? KEDI Journal of Educational, 2(January), 95–114. Retrieved from http://libir1.ied.edu.hk/dspace/handle/2260.2/5482
Sharma, U., & George, S. (2016). Understanding Teacher Self-Efficacy To Teach In Inclusive Classroom. In S. Garvis & D. Pendergast (Eds.), Asia-Pacific perspectives on teacher self-efficacy. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Sharma, U., & Jacobs, D. K. (2016). Predicting in-service educators’ intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms in India and Australia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.12.004
Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x
Sharma, U., Shaukat, S., & Furlonger, B. (2014). Attitudes and self-efficacy of pre-service teachers towards inclusion in Pakistan. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 15(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12071
Shaukat, S., Sharma, U., & Furlonger, B. (2013). Pakistani and Australian Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes and Self- Efficacy towards Inclusive Education. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 23(2).
Specht, J., McGhie-Richmond, D., Loreman, T., Mirenda, P., Bennett, S., Gallagher, T., … Cloutier, S. (2016). Teaching in inclusive classrooms: Efficacy and beliefs of Canadian preservice teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1059501
Suryana, A. (2006). Manajemen Kelas. Bandung.
Toropainen, A. S. ja K. (2019). Ways to structure an inclusive classroom: Inclusive instruction. Retrieved July 2, 2019, from HundrED website: https://hundred.org/en/innovations/inclusive-instruction
Tsakiridou, H., & Polyzopoulou, K. (2014). Greek Teachers’ Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-4-6
Tuti, A. N. K. (2017). Identifikasi Kesulitan Guru dalam Pembelajarab Biaologi di Sekolah Inklusi SMA Negeri 1 Pengasih Kulon Progo. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Wahyuhastufi, A. (2015). Identifikasi Hambatan-Hambatan Guru dalam Pembelajaran di Kelas III A Sekolah Inklusi SD Negeri Giwangan Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (2009). Handbook of Motivation at School. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Wiyarsi, A., Hendayana, S., Firman, H., & Anwar, S. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Self Efficacy Mengajar Kimia di Sekolah Kejuruan untuk Calon Guru Kimia. Peran Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia Dalam Mengembangkan INdustri Kreatif. Yogyakarta.
Yada, A., & Savolainen, H. (2017). Japanese in-service teachers ’ attitudes toward inclusive education and self-efficacy for inclusive practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.005
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher Self-Efficacy and Its Effects on Classroom Processes, Student Academic Adjustment, and Teacher Well-Being: A Synthesis of 40 Years of Research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
The author who will publish the manuscript at Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-prints sites or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work
