Meningkatkan perilaku prososial pelajar Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) melalui pembelajaran karakter: Bagaimana efektivitasnya?
Abstract
Abstract
Increasing prosocial behavior can help solve social problems that occur in the community. Cultivation of prosocial behavior can be done at school through character learning. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of character learning to improve prosocial behavior in working together, helping and respecting the rights and welfare of others in high school adolescents. The experimental research design used in this study was one group pretest-posttest. Research participants numbered 21 class XI Xin Zhong Surabaya High School students who were selected based on purposive sampling techniques. The research instrument used a prosocial scale compiled by researchers with a reliability coefficient of ? = 0.898. The results of the analysis using Wilcoxon show that character learning is effective for improving the prosocial behavior of high school adolescents. It is recommended that teachers use the character learning module to improve the prosocial behavior of high school adolescents.
Keywords: Character learning; Learning effectiveness; Prosocial behavior
Abstrak
Peningkatan perilaku prososial dapat membantu menyelesaikan permasalahan sosial yang terjadi di masyarakat. Penanaman perilaku prososial dapat dilakukan di sekolah melalui pembelajaran karakter. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas pembelajaran karakter untuk meningkatkan perilaku prososial bekerja sama, menolong dan menghargai hak dan kesejahteraan orang lain pada remaja SMA. Desain penelitian eksperimen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah one group pretest-posttest. Partisipan penelitian berjumlah 21 siswa kelas XI SMA Xin Zhong Surabaya yang terpilih berdasarkan teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan skala prososial yang disusun oleh peneliti dengan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar ?= 0,898. Hasil analisis menggunakan Wilcoxon menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran karakter efektif untuk meningkatkan perilaku prososial remaja SMA. Disarankan agar para guru menggunakan modul pembelajaran karakter untuk meningkatkan perilaku prososial remaja SMA.
Kata kunci: Efektivititas Pembelajaran; Pembelajaran Karakter; Perilaku Prososial
Downloads
References
Abdullahi, I. A., & Kumar, P. (2016). Gender differences in prosocial behaviour. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4).
Anjani, K. Y. (2018). Hubungan antara empati dengan perilaku prososial pada siswa SMK swasta X di Surabaya. Character: Jurnal Psikologi, 5(2), 1–6.
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Barr, J. J., & Alessandro, A. N. N. H. (2007). Adolescent empathy and prosocial behavior in the multidimensional context of school culture. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.168.3.231-250
Bierhoff, H.-W. (2005). Prosocial behaviour. In Social Psychology A Modular Course. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Caprara, G. V., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Zuffianò, A., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2015). Why and how to promote adolescents’ prosocial behaviors: direct, mediated and moderated effects of the CEPIDEA school-based program. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2211–2229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0293-1
Diggs, C. R., & Akos, P. (2016). The promise of character education in middle school : a meta-analysis. Middle Grades Review, 2(2).
Ding, W., Shao, Y., Sun, B., Xie, R., Li, W., & Wang, X. (2018). How can prosocial behavior be motivated? The different roles of moral judgment, moral elevation, and moral identity among the young Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(MAY), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00814
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x.Age
Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children.
Farid. (2011). Hubungan penalaran moral, kecerdasan emosi, religiusitas, dan pola asuh orangtua otoritatif dengan perilaku prososial remaja. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Gallitto, E., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2019). Moderating effect of trait emotional intelligence on the relationship between parental nurturance and prosocial behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 74 (October 2018), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.04.008
García-sancho, E., Salguero, J. M., & Fernández-berrocal, P. (2014). Aggression and violent behavior relationship between emotional intelligence and aggression : a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.007
Gondim, S. M. G., & Bendassolli, P. F. (2014). The use of the qualitative content analysis in psychology : a critical review. Psicologia Em Estudo, 19(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-737220530002
Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2011). Social psychology (sixth). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Jannah, P. M., & Djuwita, R. (2018). Intervensi peningkatan perilaku prososial dalam upaya menurunkan perundungan. Persona:Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 7(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.30996/persona.v7i1.1466
Khusumadewi, A., & Juliantika, Y. T. (2018). The effectiveness of cinema therapy to improve student empathy. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 212(February). https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-18.2018.124
Kline, R., Bankert, A., Levitan, L., & Kraft, P. (2017). Personality and prosocial behavior: a multilevel meta-analysis*. Political Science Research and Methods Cambridge University Press, 7(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.14
Kusumawardani, M. (2013). Implementasi nilai-nilai pendidikan karakter di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Negeri 4 Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Lestari, D., & Partini. (2015). Hubungan antara penalaran moral dengan perilaku prososial pada remaja. Jurnal Indigenous, 13(2), 41–46.
Lickona, T. (1991). Mendidik untuk membentuk karakter bagaimana sekolah dapat mengajarkan sikap hormat dan tanggung jawab. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Lickona, T., & Davidson, M. (2005). Smart & good high schools: integrating excellence and ethics for success in school, work, and beyond. In Learning. Washington, D.C.
Llorca-Mestre, A., Malonda-Vidal, E., & Samper-Garcia, P. (2017). Prosocial reasoning and emotions in young offenders and non-offenders. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9, 65–73. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.01.001
Manullang, K. K. B. (2017). Pengaruh intensitas penggunaan jejaring sosial dan kematangan emosi terhadap kepedulian sosial. Psikoborneo, 5(4), 864–873.
Mestre, M. V., Carlo, G., Samper, P., Malonda, E., & Mestre, A. L. (2019). Bidirectional relations among empathy-related traits, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 28(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12366
Myers, D. G. (2010). Social psychology (10th ed.). In Social Psychology (10th ed.) (Tenth). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276052.n353
Niva, H. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan cinematherapy untuk meningkatkan perilaku prososial pada siswa Bosowa International School Makassar. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan & Konseling, 2(1), 41–48.
Nucci, L. P., & Narvaez, D. (2008). Handbook of Moral and Character Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203114896
Plenty, S., Östberg, V., & Modin, B. (2015). The role of psychosocial school conditions in adolescent prosocial behaviour. School Psychology International, 36(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034315573350
Poulou, M. S. (2010). The role of trait emotional intelligence and social and emotional skills in students’ emotional and behavioural strengths and difficulties: A study of Greek adolescents’ perceptions. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 2(2), 30–47.
Putri, S. M. (2019). Merawat nilai luhur bangsa Indonesia. Retrieved September 7, 2019, from http://bit.ly/2MWUEFe
Ramdhani, M. A. (2014). Lingkungan pendidikan dalam implementasi pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 8(1)(December), 28–37.
Rogers, J., & Révész, A. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334250281
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational psychology (Fifth). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
Song, P. (2015). Sincerity respect humility peace Di Zi Gui Level 1. Seri Kembangan: Chung Hua Cultural Education Centre (M)Bhd.
Tamnes, C. K., Overbye, K., Ferschmann, L., Fjell, A. M., Walhovd, K. B., Blakemore, S.-J., & Dumontheil, I. (2018). Social perspective taking is associated with self-reported prosocial behavior and regional cortical thickness across adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 54(9), 1745–1757. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000541.supp
Tasneem, K. (2015). Enhancing adolescents ’ prosocial attitudes and prosocial behaviors through the implementation of a research based comprehensive character education programme. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 10(4), 337–343.
Umayah, A. N., Ariyanto, A., & Yustisia, W. (2017). Pengaruh empati emosional terhadap perilaku prososial yang dimoderasi oleh jenis kelamin pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 15(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.7454/jps.2017.7
Villard-Gallego, L., Garcia-Carrion, R., Yanez-Marquina, L., & Estevez, A. (2018). Impact of the interactive learning environments in children’s prosocial behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072138
Wentzel, K. (2015). Prosocial behaviour and schooling. Encyclopedia of Early Childhood Development, 1–5.
Xie, X., Chen, W., Lei, L., Xing, C., & Zhang, Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.002
Yang, D. (2015). The contemporary significance of promoting Di Zi Gui spirit from the perspective of the core socialist values. Cross-Cultural Communication, 11(3), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.3968/6653
Zainuddin, A. (2017). Generasi milenial yang apatis. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://bit.ly/2RtrwHL
The author who will publish the manuscript at Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-prints sites or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work
