Apakah pemberdayaan pembelajar dapat mendukung kemampuan inovatif mahasiswa? Pengujian korelasional dan komparatif
Abstract
Abstract
Competition between companies relies on innovations from their employees. The potential of innovative employees could be developed since they were college students. One of the many ways to see their potential is by looking at how they perceive their capabilities, impacts, and means in academic settings, also known as learner empowerment. This study aims to look at the relationship between Learner Empowerment and Innovative Work Behavior in University of Indonesia college students. Participants of this research are 539 students above freshman year, gathered using the convenience sampling technique. The instrument used are the Innovative Work Behavior Scale by Janssen (2000) (? = 0,88) and the Learner Empowerment Scale by Frymier dkk. (1996) (? = 0,87), both instruments are adapted accordingly to suit the participants for this research. Analysis techniques used are Pearson's Correlation, Independent Sample T-Test, and One-way ANOVA. Results showed that there's a positive significant relationship between learner empowerment and innovative work behaviour. Dimensions of learner empowerment (meaningfulness, competence, impact) also have significant relationships to innovative work behaviour, with impact as the strongest determinant. Further research can explore other factors that explain the relationship between these two variables.
Keywords: College Students; Correlational Research; Innovative Work Behavior; Learner Empowerment
Abstrak
Persaingan antar perusahaan pada masa ini membutuhkan ide inovatif dari karyawannya. Kemampuan inovatif karyawan dapat dikembangkan sejak individu masih menjadi mahasiswa. Salah satunya dengan bagaimana mahasiswa mempersepsikan kemampuan, potensi, dan peran yang dimilikinya dalam lingkungan belajar, dikenal sebagai pemberdayaan pembelajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara pemberdayaan pembelajar dengan perilaku kerja inovatif pada mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia. Partisipan penelitian merupakan 539 mahasiswa yang berada di atas semester 3, didapatkan melalui teknik convenience sampling. Alat ukur yang digunakan merupakan Innovative Work Behavior Scale dari Janssen (2000) (? = 0,88) dan Learner Empowerment Scale dari Frymier dkk. (1996) (? = 0,87) yang diadaptasi menyesuaikan target partisipan penelitian. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah Pearson Correlation, Independent Sample T-Test, dan One-way ANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan positif dan signifikan antara Pemberdayaan Pembelajar dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif. Ketiga dimensi pemberdayaan pembelajar (meaningfulness, competence, impact) juga secara signifikan berhubungan dengan perilaku kerja inovatif, dengan dimensi impact sebagai penentu terkuat. Penelitian lanjutan dapat mencari faktor yang mampu menjelaskan hubungan kedua variabel ini.
Kata kunci: Mahasiswa; Pemberdayaan Pembelajar; Penelitian Korelasional; Perilaku Kerja Inovatif
Downloads
References
Abdullah, N. H., Lee Ping, L., Wahab, E., & Shamsuddin, A. (2014). Perception on training and employee innovativeness: An evidence from small firms. ICMIT 2014 - 2014 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2014.6942404
Agarwal, U. A. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2012-0019
Bauer, W., Hämmerle, M., Schlund, S., & Vocke, C. (2015). Transforming to a Hyper-connected Society and Economy – Towards an “Industry 4.0.” Procedia Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.200
Batool T, Noureen G., & Ayuob Z. (2020). Relating learner empowerment with learner self-regulation learning in Higher Education. Review of Economics and Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.26710/reads.v5i4.903
Brooks, C. F., & Young, S. L. (2011). Are choice-making opportunities needed in the classroom ? Using self- determination theory to consider student motivation and learner empowerment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
Chang, S. J., Van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. In Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.88
Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2020). The global innovation index 2020: Who will finance innovation?. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Creativity in Schools: Tensions and dilemmas, January 2005, 1–192. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357965
Davis, K. A., & Amelink, C. T. (2016). Exploring differences in perceived innovative thinking skills between first year and upperclassmen engineers. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757369
Elliott AC, W. W. (2007). Statistical analysis quick reference guidebook with SPSS examples. In London: Sage Publications.
Etikariena, A. (2019). Perbedaan perilaku kerja inovatif berdasarkan karakteristik individu karyawan. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.17.2.107-118
Etikariena, A. (2017). Analisis efek mediasi identitas keorganisasian dan kesiapan karyawan untuk berinovasi pada hubungan antara ingatan keorganisasian dan perilaku kerja inovatif (Disertasi doktoral, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia tidak diterbitkan). Diperoleh dari http://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20446751&lokasi=lokal#parentHorizontalTab2
Etikariena, A., & Muluk, H. (2014). Correlation between organizational memory and innovative work behavior. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 18(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v18i2.3463
Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. Technical Note, 52374.
Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45(3), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529609379048
Ghani, N. A. A., Hussin, T. A. B. S. bin R., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Antecedents of psychological empowerment in the Malaysian private higher education institutions. International Education Studies, 2(3), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n3p161
Hsu, M. L. A., Hou, S. T., & Fan, H. L. (2011). Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.x
Hussin, T. A. B. S. bin R., Ghani, N. A. binti A., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Stimulating lecturers’ innovative behaviour in Malaysian polytechnics. Academic Leadership.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
Kirk, C. M., Lewis, R. K., Brown, K., Karibo, B., & Park, E. (2016). The power of student empowerment: Measuring classroom predictors and individual indicators. Journal of Educational Research, 109(6), 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.1002880
Kirk, C. M., Lewis, R. K., Brown, K., Karibo, B., Scott, A., & Park, E. (2017). The empowering schools project: Identifying the classroom and school characteristics that lead to student empowerment. Youth and Society, 49(6), 827–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14566118
Knol, J., & Van Linge, R. (2009). Innovative behaviour: The effect of structural and psychological empowerment on nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04876.x
Martín, P., Poto?nik, K., & Fras, A. B. (2017). Determinants of students’ innovation in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1087993
Maunder, R. E., Cunliffe, M., Galvin, J., Mjali, S., & Rogers, J. (2013). Listening to student voices: Student researchers exploring undergraduate experiences of university transition. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9595-3
Murray, J. (2019). Student empowerment and sustainability. Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_365-1
Palazzeschi, L., Bucci, O., & Di Fabio, A. (2018). Re-thinking innovation in organizations in the industry 4.0 scenario: New challenges in a primary prevention perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00030
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A Critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. In Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Puji, R. P. N., Hidayah, B., Rahmawati, I., Lestari, D. A. Y., Fachrizal, A., & Novalinda, C. (2018). Increasing multi-business awareness through “prol papaya” innovation. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 5(55), 2349-0381.
Rahman, A. A., Panatik, S. A., & Alias, R. A. (2014). The Influence of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior among academia in Malaysian research Universities Azra. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research.
Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and Test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x
Rieken, B., Schar, M., Shapiro, S., Gilmartin, S. K., & Sheppard, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between mindfulness and innovation in engineering students. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017-June. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28341
Roffeei, S. H. M., Kamarulzaman, Y., & Yusop, F. D. (2017). Inculcating innovative behaviour among students: Determinants of innovation culture in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem.vol5no4.1
Schmidt, H. J., & Baumgarth, C. (2017). PraxisWISSEN marketing empowerment from a “ student as customer ” perspective : Literature review and development of a framework in the. PraxisWISSEN Marketing, May. https://doi.org/10.15459/95451.14
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
Singh, M., & Sarkar, A. (2012). The relationship between psychological empowerment and innovative behavior: A dimensional analysis with job involvement as mediator. Journal of Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000065
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
Stoffers, J., Neessen, P., & Dorp, P. van. (2015). Organizational culture and innovative work behavior: A case study of a manufacturer of packaging machines. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2015.54022
Utami, F. A. (2016). Pelatihan developing self in work through psychological empowerment untuk meningkatkan pemberdayaan psikologis dan perilaku kerja inovatif. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas indonesia, Depok.
Van De Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
Wang, F. X. H. (Frank), Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., & Janssen, O. (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader-member exchange perspectives. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1994
Yujing, N. (2015). Influence of flipped classroom on learner’s empowerment - A study based on english writing courses in China. An International Peer-Reviewed Journal.
The author who will publish the manuscript at Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-prints sites or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work
