Adaptasi dan uji properti psikometrik The PERMA-Profiler pada orang Indonesia
Abstract
Abstract
The PERMA-Profiler is a well-being instrument which combines the hedonic and eudaimonic perspective of well-being. This instrument was developed based on well-being theory (Seligman, 2012) which explained well-being as a multidimensional construct, included positive emotion, engagement, relationship, meaning, and accomplishment (PERMA). This study aimed to adapt and examine the psychometric properties of the PERMA-Profiler in Indonesian people. The participants were 439 Indonesians, aged 17-63 years old (mean age = 30,82; SD = 10,00). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the measurement model of PERMA. The result showed that the PERMA-Profiler met the goodness of fit criteria as a multi dimensional construct with five elements. Fourteen items have satisfactory factor loading. The PERMA-Profiler has good construct reliability as well as Cronbach’s alpha. The convergent validity was shown by the positive correlation between elements of PERMA with satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) and subjective happiness scale (SHS). In addition, the significant correlation between elements and each element with a total score proved the multidimensional nature of PERMA. The overall findings showed that the adaptation version of PERMA-Profiler have a good psychometric property and could be applied to Indonesian people.
Keywords: confirmatory factor analysis; PERMA; reliability; validity; well-being
Abstrak
The PERMA-Profiler merupakan instrumen kebahagiaan yang memadukan perspektif hedonik dan eudaimonik untuk mengukur kebahagiaan. Instrumen ini mengacu pada well-being theory (M. E. P. Seligman, 2012) yang menjelaskan kebahagiaan sebagai konstruk multidimensi, meliputi positive emotion, engagement, relationship, meaning, dan accomplishment (PERMA). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengadaptasi dan menguji properti psikometrik the PERMA-Profiler pada orang Indonesia. Partisipan berjumlah 439 orang Indonesia (pria = 108, wanita = 331) dan berusia antara 17- 63 tahun (usia rerata = 30,82 tahun; SD = 10,00). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) digunakan untuk menguji model pengukuran. Hasil CFA memperlihatkan the PERMA-Profiler memenuhi kriteria kecocokan model sebagai konstruk multidimensi yang terdiri dari lima elemen. Terdapat 14 dari 15 aitem yang valid. Keempatbelas aitem juga yang mengukur satu konstruk tunggal yaitu well-being. The PERMA-Profiler juga memperlihatkan reliabilitas komposit dan konsistensi internal yang memuaskan. Korelasi positif yang signifikan dengan pengukuran skala kepuasan hidup dan skala kebahagiaan umum menunjukkan PERMA-Profiler memenuhi validitas konvergen. Setiap dimensi berkorelasi signifikan satu sama lain dan dengan skor total. Temuan ini memperlihatkan hasil adaptasi the PERMA-Profiler memiliki properti psikometrik yang bagus dan dapat diterapkan pada orang Indonesia.
Kata Kunci: confirmatory factor analysis; kebahagiaan; PERMA; reliabilitas; validitas
Downloads
References
Ascenso, S., Williamon, A., & Perkins, R. (2017). Understanding the wellbeing of professional musicians through the lens of Positive Psychology. Psychology of Music, 45(1), 65 –81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616646864
Asebedo, S. D., & Seay, M. C. (2014). Positive psychological attributes and retirement satisfaction. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 25(2), 161–173.
Baltzell, A., Akhtar, V. L., McCarthy, Hurley, D., & Martin, I. (2011). Happiness and well-being models: Empirical support from high school coaching study. Athletic Insight, 6(2), 125–135.
Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some consideration. Paidéia, 22(53), 423–432.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016). The PERMA-Profiler : A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526
Camfield, L., Choudhury, K., & Devine, J. (2009). Well-being, happiness and why relationships matter: Evidence from bangladesh. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9062-5
Carvalho, T. F. de, Aquino, S. D. de, & Natividade, J. C. (2021). Flourishing in the Brazilian context : Evidence of the validity of the PERMA-profiler scale. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01587-w
Choi, S. P., Suh, C., Yang, J. W., Ye, B. J., Lee, C. K., Son, B. C., & Choi, M. (2019). Korean translation and validation of the Workplace Positive emotion , Engagement , Relationships , Meaning , and Accomplishment ( PERMA ) -Profiler. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, August, 1–13.
Coffey, J. K., Wray-Lake, L., Mashek, D., & Branand, B. (2016). A multi-study examination of well-being theory in college and community samples. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9590-8
Datu, J. A. D., & Valdez, J. P. M. (2012). Exploring Filipino adolescents ’ conception of happiness. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 1(3), 21–29.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin|, 95(3), 542–575.
Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, A., & Griffin, R. (1985). The satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49.(1), 71–75.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Furr, R. M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. SAGE Publication, Inc.
Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2013). Psychometrics. An inttroduction. SAGE Publication, Inc.
Giangrasso, B. (2018). Psychometric properties of the PERMA-Profiler as hedonic and eudaimonic well-being measure in an Italian context. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0040-3
Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.147
He, J., & Vijver, F. van de. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1111
Hidayat, R., Habibi, A., Rashid, M., Saad, M., & Mukminin, A. (2018). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of PERMA for Indonesian Students in Mathematics Education Programmes. Pedagogika, 132(4), 147–165.
Hirschi, A. (n.d.). Effects of orientations to happiness on vocational identity achievement. Career Development Quarterly, 59(4), 367-378.
Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4
Jones, W. P., & Loe, S. A. (2013). Optimal number of questionnaire response categories : More may not be better. SAGE Open, April-June, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013489691
Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802303044
Kern, M. L., Waters, L., Adler, A., & White, M. (2014). Assessing employee wellbeing in schools using a multifaceted approach: Associations with Physical health, life satisfaction, and professional thriving. Psychology, 5(April), 500–513. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.56060
Kern, M. L., Waters, L. E., Adler, A., & White, M. A. (2015). A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.936962
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.1007
Keyes, C. L. M., & Simoes, E. J. (2012). To flourish or not : Positive mental health and all-cause mortality. 102(11), 2164–2173. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300918
Khaw, D., & Kern, M. L. (n.d.). A Cross-cultural comparison of the PERMA model of Well-being. Undergraduate Journal of Psychology at Berkeley, 1–22.
Lambert D’raven, L., & Pasha-Zaidi, N. (2016). Using the PERMA model in the United Arab Emirates. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 905–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0866-0
Lietz, P. (2010). Research into questionnaire design. A summary of the literature. International Journal of Market Research, 52(2), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.2501/S147078530920120X
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
Macaro, A. (2005). Aristotle and the Good life. Practical Philosophy, Autumn, 4–6.
Maulana, H., Khawaja, N., & Obst, P. (2019). Psychology development and validation of the Indonesian Well-being scale. Asian Journal of Social, March. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12366
Novaliah, & Kartowagiran, B. (2018). The Content validity of instrument of character education in chemistry learning. 5th ICRIEMS Proceedings, CE63–CE70.
Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: the full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z
Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Martin, E. P. (2007). Strengths of character , orientations to happiness , and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228938
Pezirkianidis, C., Stalikas, A., Lakioti, A., & Yotsidi, V. (2019). Validating a multidimensional measure of wellbeing in Greece : Translation , factor structure , and measurement invariance of the PERMA Profiler. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00236-7
Pflug, J. (2009). Folk theories of happiness: A cross-cultural comparison of conceptions of happiness in Germany and South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 92, 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9306-8
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
Roncaglia, I. (2012). The Role of wellbeing and wellness: A positive psychological model in supporting young people with ASCs. Psychological Thought, 10(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.203
Ryan, J., Curtis, R., Olds, T., Edney, S., Vandelanotte, C., Plotnikoff, R., & Maher, C. (2019). Psychometric properties of the PERMA Profiler for measuring wellbeing in Australian adults. PLoS ONE, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0225932
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. 55(1), 68–78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials : A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology. 52, 141-166.
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). LivingWell: A Self determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
Ryff, C D, & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Ryff, Carol D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything , or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.
Saputra, A., Goei, Y. A., & Lanawati, S. (2016). Hubungan believing dan belonging sebagai dimensi religiusitas dengan lima dimensi well-being pada mahasiswa di Tangerang. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 3(1), 7–17.
Scorsolini-Comin, F., Fontaine, A. M. G. V., Koller, S. H., & Santos, M. A. Dos. (2009). From authentic happiness to well-being: the flourishing of Positive Psychology. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(4), 663–670. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000400006
Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting. The Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish (2nd ed.). Random House Australia Pty, Ltd.
Sepulveda, C. I., & Ibáñez, C. (2013). Flourishing in Chile. How to increase well- being in the Country? Estudos Contemporâneos da Subjetividade, 3(2), 267-275.
Tansey, T. N., Smedema, S., Umucu, E., Iwanaga, K., Wu, J., Cardoso, S., & Strauser, D. (2018). Assessing college life adjustment of students with disabilities : Application of the PERMA framework. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 6(3), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355217702136
Tiberius, V., & Hall, A. (2010). Normative theory and psychological research: Hedonism, eudaimonism, and why it matters. In The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003790971
Veenhoven, R. (2003). Hedonism and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(4), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHS.0000005719.56211.fd
Watanabe, K., Kawakami, N., Shiotani, T., Adachi, H., Matsumoto, K., Imamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Yamagami, F., Fusejima, A., Muraoka, T., Kagami, T., Shimazu, A., & Kern, M. L. (2018). The Japanese workplace PERMA-Profiler: A validation study among Japanese workers. 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.2018-0050-OA
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two Conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of Personal expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691.
Waterman, A. S. (2005). When Effort is enjoyed: Two Studies of intrinsic motivation for personally salient activities when effort is enjoyed : Two studies of Intrinsic. Motivation and Emotion, 29(3), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-005-9440-4
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The Implications of Two conceptions of happiness (Hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of Intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9020-7
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
Wijanto, S. H. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling dengan Lisrel 8.8. Graha Ilmu.
The author who will publish the manuscript at Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-prints sites or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work
