Adaptasi dan validasi the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 pada individu yang telah menikah selama pandemi Covid-19
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to adapt and validate the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 in a group of married individuals in Indonesia during the pandemic of Covid-19. Getting married is a significant transitional stage for individuals. Previous research has shown that married couples experience anxiety over their lives and family as a response to uncertain conditions. The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 is a scale to measure individual responses to uncertainty. However, as the best of researcher’s knowledge, there was no Indonesian version that has been culturally adapted and validated. This research used quantitative method and 203 participants participated in this study through snowball sampling. Data analysis utilized factor analysis with the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to measure construct validity, Aiken’s V to measure content validity, and Cronbach’s Alpha to measure reliability. Results showed that model fit at the 4 factors according to χ2, RMSEA, SRMSR, CFI, and TLI scores. Those aspects are negative perception of uncertainty, desire for certainty, behavioral inhibition due to uncertainty, and helplessness toward uncertainty. Furthermore, explanation about the factors formation will be discussed.
Keywords: adaptation, Indonesia, IUS-12, married individuals, validation
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengadaptasi dan memvalidasi the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 pada kelompok individu yang telah menikah di Indonesia selama pandemi Covid-19. Menikah merupakan tahap transisi yang cukup signifikan bagi individu. Penelitian sebelumnya telah menunjukkan bahwa pasangan menikah mengalami kecemasan sebagai respon atas ketidakpastian. The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 merupakan skala untuk mengukur respon individu atas ketidakpastian namun sebatas pengetahuan peneliti, belum ada versi Bahasa Indonesia yang telah melalui proses adaptasi dan validasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan partisipan berjumlah 203 orang yang diperoleh dengan snowball sampling. Analisis data menggunakan analisis faktor dengan exploratory factor analysis (EFA) dan confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) untuk mengukur validitas konstruk, Aiken’s V untuk mengukur validitas isi, dan Cronbach’s Alpha untuk mengukur reliabilitas. Hasil analisis menunjukkan kesesuaian model dengan 4 faktor (aspek) didasarkan pada skor χ2, RMSEA, SRMSR, CFI, dan TLI. Aspek tersebut yaitu persepsi negatif terhadap ketidakpastian, hasrat akan kepastian, tindakan terhalangi oleh ketidakpastian, dan ketidakberdayaan menghadapi ketidakpastian. Lebih jauh lagi, terdapat penjelasan mengenai faktor-faktor yang terbentuk.
Kata kunci: adaptasi, individu menikah, Indonesia, IUS-12, validasi
Downloads
References
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Anxiety. Retrieved October 26, 2020, from https://www.apa.org/topics/anxiety
Anggraeni, R., Nurjanah, S., & Mubin, M. F. (2016). Hubungan penyesuaian peran dengan tingkat kecemasan pada pasangan baru menikah. Jurnal Keperawatan, 8(1), 25–30.
Azwar, S. (2016). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.
Birrell, J., Meares, K., Wilkinson, A., & Freeston, M. (2011). Toward a definition of intolerance of uncertainty : A review of factor analysis studies of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Clinical Psychological Review, 31, 1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.009
Bottesi, G., Marchetti, I., Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2020). What is the internal structure of intolerance of uncertainty? A network analysis approach. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 75, 102293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102293
Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behavior Research and Therapy, 40, 931–945.
Carleton, R. N., Norton, M. A. P. J., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 105–117.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson.
Dehle, C., & Weiss, R. L. (2002). Associations between anxiety and maritcal adjustment. The Journal of Psychology, 136(3), 328–338.
Dugas, M. J., Gosselin, P., & Ladouceur, R. (2001). Intolerance of uncertainty and worry: Investigating narrow specificity in a non-clinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 551-558.
Fadhilah, N. M., Fauziah, S., Riana, D., Eko, A., Yulianto, A., & Sulthon, B. M. (2020). Influence of overload information about COVID-19 pandemic on internet for psychological illness and behavioral intentions to continue searching for information. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1641, 1–6.
Freeston, M. H., Rheéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17(6), 791–802.
Friston, K. (2008). Impact of journaling on students’ self-efficacy and locus of control. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 3, 75–83. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.46504/03200809fr
Gomes, Á. K. V., Diniz, L. F. M., Lage, G. M., de Miranda, D. M., de Paula, J. J., Costa, D., & Albuquerque, M. R. (2017). Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Version of the Dickman Impulsivity Inventory (Br-DII). Frontiers in Psychcology, 8(1992), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01992
Hajebi, A., Motevalian, A., Amin?Esmaeili, M., Rahimi?Movaghar, A., Sharifi, V., Hoseini, L., Shadloo, B., & Mojtabai, R. (2018). Adaptation and validation of short scales for assessment of psychological distress in Iran: The Persian K10 and K6. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 27(3), 1–9.
Hutama, E. T., Atyeo, J., & Kuntoro, I. A. (2017). Development and validation of Social Anxiety Scale (SAS). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 213–221.
Johansson, M., Benderix, Y., & Svensson, I. (2020). Mothers’ and fathers’ lived experiences of postpartum depression and parental stress after childbirth: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 15(1), 1–11.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, dan Coping. Springer.
Mardhiyana, R. (2019). Pengaruh intolerance of uncertainty terhadap generalized anxiety disorder pada remaja. Universitas Muhammadyah Malang.
Martínez, I. M., Meneghel, I., Carmona-Halty, M., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2019). Adaptation and validation to Spanish of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire-12 (PCQ-12) in academic contexts. Current Psychology.
Mittal, C., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Sense of control under uncertainty depends on people’s childhood environment: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 621–637. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037398
Nye, C. D., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Assessing goodness of fit: Simple rules of thumb simply do not work. Organizational Research Method, 14(3), 548–570. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/1094428110368562
Prudon, P. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis as a tool in research using questionnaires: A critique. Comprehensive Psychology, 4(10), 1–19. https://doi.org/DOI : 10.2466/03.CP.4.10
Rettie, H., & Daniels, J. (2020). Coping and tolerance of uncertainty: Predictors and mediators of mental health during the Covid-19 Pandemic. American Psychologist, 1–10.
Saphiro, M. O., Short, N. A., Morabito, D., & Schmidt, N. B. (2020). Prospective associations between intolerance of uncertainty and psychopatology. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110210.
Scarrf, J. R. (2019). Postpartum depression in men. Innovation in Clinical Neuroschience, 16(5–6), 11–14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6659987/
Sheppes, G., Suri, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation and psychopatology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112739
Siqueira, V. R., & Oades, L. G. (2015). Acceptance and avoidance processes at different levels of psychological recovery from enduring mental illness. Psychiatry Journal, Siqueira,(968596), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/968596
Slagers, A. J., Reininga, I. H. F., Geertzen, J. H. B., Zwerver, J., & Akker-Scheek, I. van den. (2019). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, reliability and stability to the Dutch Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport (I-PRRS-NL) Scale. Journal of Sport Sciences, 37(9), 1038–1045.
Stewart, D. E., Robertson, E., Dennis, C.-L., Grace, S. L., & Wallington, T. (2003). Postpartum Depression: Literature Review of Risk Factors and Intervention. University Health Network Women’s Health Program.
Strokes, J. E. (2017). Mutual influence and older married adults’ anxiety sympotms: Results from the Irish Longituinal Study on Ageing. Gerontologist, 57(3), 529–539.
Swar, B., Hameed, T., & Reychav, I. (2017). Information overload, psychological ill-being, and behavioral intention to continue online healthcare information search. Computers in Human Behavior, 70(C), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.068
Trigueros, R., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Cangas, A. J., Mullor, D., Álvarez, J. F., & García-Mas, A. (2019). Adaptation and validation the State Mindfulness Scale (SMS) to physical education in a Spanish context. Sustainability, 11(5681), 1–10.
Tull, M. T., Barbano, A. C., Scamaldo, K. M., Richmond, J. R., Edmonds, K. A., Rose, J. P., & Gratz, K. L. (2020). The prospective influence of COVID-19 affective risk assessments and intolerance of uncertainty on later dimensions of health anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 75, 102290.
Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/0095798418771807
Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.531299
Young, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
Yuniardi, M. S. (2019). Cognitive risk factors predicting social anxiety among Indonesian Adolescents. Anima Indonesian Psychological Journal, 34(2), 85–92.
Zaider, T. I., Heimberg, R. G., & Iida, M. (2010). Anxiety disorders and intimate relationships: A study of daily processes in couples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(1), 163–173.
Zajenkowska, A., Jasielska, D., & Melonowska, J. (2017). Stress and sensitivity to frustration predicting depression among young adults in Poland and Korea - Psychological and philosophical explanations. Curret Psychology, 38, 769–774. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s12144-017-9654-0
Copyright (c) 2022 Annisa Ardi Ayuningtyas, Avin Fadilla Helmi, Wahyu Widhiarso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author who will publish the manuscript at Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, pre-prints sites or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater dissemination of published work
