Kecerdasan Emosi, Anonimitas dan Cyberbullying (Bully Dunia Maya)

  • Renny Nirwana Sari Fakultas Psikologi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Suryanto . Fakultas Psikologi Airlangga Surabaya

Abstract

The purpose of this study to examine the relationship between emotional
intelligence and anonymity with cyberbullying in terms of gender. This study was done
with quantitative methods. Measurement variables of this research using a scale of
cyberbullying, emotional intelligence scale and the scale of anonymity. were Subjects
junior high school students in Sidoarjo, which amounted to 44 students with a lifespan of
13-17 years with a mix of men and women at least 21 of 23 students, which is in
accordance with the criteria as perpetrators of cyberbullying. were analyzed using
regression analysis, partial correlation,and Anova. The results showed: first, there was
no significant relationship between emotional intelligence and anonymity with
cyberbullying. second, there is a positive relationship of emotional intelligence with
cyberbullying. Third, the anonymity has a negative relationship with cyberbullying.
Fourth, the difference in cyberbullying behavior between men and women, where men
there is a tendency to become perpetrators of cyberbullying.
Keywords : Emotional Intelligence , Anonymity , Cyberbullying

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azwar, S. (2010).Reliabilitas dan Validitas.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2010).Penyusunan Skala

Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

BPS (2012). Statistik Telekomunikasi

Indonesia 2012. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Departement of Education and Training

Policies.(n.d.).Keeping Children Safe in

Cyberspace. Australia: Departement of

Education and Training Policies.

Demsey, Sulowski. M, Nichols & Storch. R,

(2009) Differences Between Peer

Victimization in Cyber And Assosiated

Psychosocial adjustment In Early

Adolescence.

Division of Techonology and Career

Education. (2007). Guidlines and

Resources for Internet Safety in

Schools. Virginia: Virginia

Departement of Education.

Diener E. Deindividuation: the absence of

self-awareness and self-regulation in

group members. In: Paulus PB, ed.

ThePsychology of Group

Influence.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence

Erlbaum; 1980:209-242.

Fabiola, V (2014) Cyberbullying Questionare

manual .Journal : Volume 29, nomor 2,

Fauzi, M.L (2012) Cyberbullying merupakan

fenomena Gunung ES, Yoyakarta: PSI

UII.

Fleming, M., & Towey, K. (2002).Forum

Pendidikan pada RemajaKesehatan:

Youth Bullying . Chicago: American

Medical Association.

Goleman,D.(1999). Kecerdasan Emosi Untuk

mencapai puncak prestasi, Jakarta : PT.

Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Goleman,D.(1995) emotional Intellegence

New York; Bantam Books.

Hadi, S. (1986). Metodelogi research.

Yogyakarta; Yayasan pendidikan

psikologi Universitas Gajah Mada

Yogyakarta.

Hinduja, S & Patchin, J. W. (2008)

Cyberbullying an Exploratory analysis

of factors related to offending and

victimization. Deviant Behav 2008;

(2)-156

Renny Nirwana Sari dan Suryanto

Hinduja, S &Patchin, J. W. (2010), Bullying,

Cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch

Auicide res.2010:14(3):206-221.

Hinduja, S & Patchin, J. W. (2011) State

Cyberbullying law: A Brief review of

State Cyberbullying Law and Policies.

Cyberbullying Research Center.

Hinduja, S & Patchin, J. W (2010) journal of

School Healt :Cyberbullying and Self

Esteem . American School Health

Association.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, JW (2008).

Cyberbullying: Sebuah eksplorasi

analisis faktor yang berhubungan

dengan menyinggung dan korban.

Deviant

Perilaku, 29 (2), 129-156.

Hurlock E.B (1999). Psikologi

perkembangan, Edisi kelima, Penerbit

erlangga Jakarta.

Jatmika, A. (2013, Juni 28).4 Alasan Remaja

Gemar Media Sosial.Retrieved

Desember 25, 2013, from Tempo

Tekno: http://www.tempo.co/read/

news/2013/06/28/061491864/4-Alasan-

Remaja-Gemar-Media-Sosial.

Kabay, M. E. (2001) Anonymity and

Pseudonymity in Cyberspace:

Deindividuation, Incivility and

Lawlessness Versus Freedom and

Privacy. Paper presented at the Annual

Conference of the European Institute

for Computer Anti-virus Research

(EICAR), Munich, Germany 16-8

March 1998. Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/

Kretschmar, J. M., (2003) The SIDE Model

Turned On its SIDE: How Anonimity

and Salient Group Identity Affect The

Formation and Replacement of Punitive

and Prosocial Norms.A

Dissertation.Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/.

Kowalski, R., & Limber, SP

(2007).Intimidasi elektronik antar

tengah siswa sekolah.Journal of

Adolescent Health, 41 (6), 22-30.

Kowalski, R., Limber, SP, & Agatston, PW

(2008).Bullying Cyber:Bullying di Era

Digital : Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Kowalski, R Susan P, Limber & Patricia W.

Agatston 2008. Cyberbullying :Bullying

in the Digital Age. American journal of

Psichiatri

Kowalski RM, Limber SP. (2007)Electronic

bullying among middleschool students.J

Adolesc Health. 2007;41:S22-S30.

Li, Qing. 2007, New Bottle but Old Wine:

Reseach of cyberbullying in Shools.

Computers in human behavior 23:1777-

Li Q. (2007) Bullying in the new playground:

research into cyberbullyingand cyber

victimisation. Aust J Educ Technol;

(4):435-454

Manstead, A. S. R. & Hewstone, M.

(1996).The Blackwell Encyclopedia of

Social Psychology. Great Britain:

Blacwell Publisher.

Mawardah, M. (2012). Hubungan Antara

Kelompok Teman Sebaya dengan

Kecenderungan Regulasi Emosi

menjadi Pelaku Cyberbullying pada

remaja Universitas Gadjah Mada,

[Yogyakarta]

Mayers, D. G. (2009) Exploring Social

Psychology 5th Edition. NY:

McGrawHill.

Moran, M & Berry, M. J. (2011) Child abuse

material and the Internet:

Cyberpsychology of online child related

sex offending

Olweus,D.(1994). Bullying di sekolah:

Tujuan jangka panjang bagi para

korban dan program intervensi berbasis

sekolah yang efektif. Di R. Huesmann

(Ed.), perilaku agresif: perspektif

Kecerdasan Emosi, Anonimitas dan Cyberbullying (Bully Dunia Maya)

Current (hal. 97-130). Baru York: John

Wiley

Olweus, D.(1993). Victimization by peer:

Antecedents and long term

consequences. In K.H Rubin& J.B

Asendorpf (pp.315-541) Hillsdale, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Reimann, M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011).The

dark side of social encounters:

Prospects for a neuroscience of human

evil. Journal of Neuroscience,

Psychology and Economics 4 (3), 174-

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024654

Santrock, W.J (2010) Remaja, edisi Revisi

Jakarta : Erlangga.

Santrock, W.J (2007) Perkembangan Masa

Hidup, Edisi Revisi 5. Jakarta: Pustaka

Setia.

Suryabrata, S (2005). Alat Ukur Psikologis,

Jogjakarta : PT. Andi

Suryabrata, S (2011) Metode Penelitian,

cetakan ke 22, Jakarta: PT. Raja

Grafindo Persada.

Suler, J. (2009) Journal : The Online

Disinhibition Effect

Susan G, Wiliams, and alice, J Godfrey

(2011) What cyberbullying & haor

Psichatric – mental Healt Nurse

Rognize it ?

Schneider, S.K, O'Donnell, Stueve,

L,Coulter, R.WS(2009) Journal of

Healt: Cyberbullying, School Bullying,

and Psychological Distress: A Regional

Census of High School

Silke,A.(2003).Deindividuation,anonymity,

and violence: Findings from northern

ireland. The Journal of Social

Psychology, 143(4), 493-9 Retrieved

fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docvie

w/199816343?accountid=17242

Vandebosch,H.& Van Cleemput, K. (2009).

Cyberbullying antara anak-anak:. Profil

pengganggu dan korban New Media &

Society, 11 (8),1349-1371

Wiyono,W. (2013)Effect of Information and

Communication Technology Toward

Emotional Quotient Studentat SMKN 1

Samarinda.

Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying:

Memprediksi korban dan

perbuatan. Anak-anak & Society, 25

(1), 59-72.

Williams, KR, & Guerra, NG (2007).

Prevalensi dan prediktor Intimidasi

Internet. Jounal of Adolescent Health,

(6), s14-S21.

Ybarra, ML, & Mitchell, KJ (2004). Agresor

online/ target, agresor dan sasaran:

Perbandingan karakteristik pemuda

Journal of Child Psikologi dan

Psikiatri, 45 (7), 1308-1316.

Published
2016-01-10
Section
Articles