KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT MELALUI FACEBOOK DAN TWITTER: STUDI KASUS UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK
Abstract
Freedom of speech is a right of every individual to the community to express their opinions either in
criticism, suggestion/comment, or opinion through various ways whether oral or in writing, directly or
indirectly by utilizing social media, such as facebook, twitter, etc. However, sometimes peoples out of
control using their freedom of rights, so there are others who feel offended and aggrieved. Such events
are already common, and should end up in prison. Based from this incident, researchers wanted to know
whether freedom of speech through facebook and twitter being limited to the existence of the law of
information and electronic transaction (UU ITE). This research uses narrative qualitative research
design, which this research aimed to describe and analyze phenomena, events, social activities, attitudes,
perceptions, and thought of someone about freedom of speech through facebook and twitter being limited
by the existence of the law of the information and electronic transactions (UU ITE) are presented in
narrative form. From the results of this research revealed that a person’s freedom of speech through
social media (facebook and twitter) is not to be limit, thus they feel comfortable because of their privacy
rights are protected. In this law provides legal protection to every user virtual world of criminals who
exploit information technology, computer, and internet networks.
Keywords: freedom of speech, social media, facebook, twitter, UU ITE
Downloads
References
Bungin, Burhan. (2012). Penelitian kualitatif.
Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Bungin, Burhan. (2013). Sosiologi komunikasi:
Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Chakrabarti, Dishari & Pati, Puja P. (2014).
Social media and its efficacy. International
journal of research and analysis vol. 2 issue
(pp. 76-84).
https://independent.academia.edu/ %20Dishari
Chakrabarti.
http://independent.academia.edu/
DishariChakrabarti . Akses: 8-1-2015.
Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational
research: Planning, conducting, and
evaluating quantitative and qualitative.
Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Holmes, David. (2012). Teori komunikasi:
Media, teknologi, dan masyarakat. (T. W.
Utomo, penerj.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka
Belajar.
http://www.komisiinformasi.go.id/regulasi/down
load/id/140
http://www.komisiinformasi.go.id/regulasi/down
load/id/140 . Akses: 31 Januari 2015.
http://batampos.co.id/24-03-2014/kebebasanberpendapat-
yang-masih-terkekang/"
http://batampos.co.id/ Akses: 24-10-2014.
http://news.detik.com/read/2014/09/09/183529/2
/10/merasa-dihina-ridwan-kamilresmi-
laporkan--kemalsept-dan-2-akunlain?
nd% 20771104bcj. Akses: 21-1-2015.
http://www.fimela.com/news-entertainment/
kasus-florence-kontroversi-uu-ite-vskebebasan-
berpendapat-di-media-sosial-
u.html . Akses: 24-10-2014.
http://www.kemenag.go.id/file/dokumen/UU110
pdf . Akses: 12-11-2015.
Jawa Pos. 2014. Etika-dan-Kebebasan-
Berekspresi, UU ITE: Mencari
Keseimbangan Antara Etika dan Kebebasan
Berekspresi .
www.jawapos.com/baca/artikel/6764/UUITE-
. Akses: 24-10-2014.
Jawa Pos (Surabaya), 7 September 2014, h.1,
k.1.
Nasrullah, Rulli. (2014). Teori dan riset media
siber (Cybermedia). Jakarta: Kencana
Prenada Media Group.
Nurudin. (2013). Media sosial baru dan
munculnya revolusi proses komunikasi.
Jurnal komunikator UMY 5(2) (pp.127-
.
www.academia.edu/5651271/Nurudin_Medi
a_Sosial. Akses: 24-10-2014.
Olii, Helena. (2007). Opini publik. Jakarta: PT
Indeks
Ruslan, Rosady. (2012). Manajemen public
relations & media komunikasi. Jakarta: PT.
Rajagrafindo Persada.
Sidik, Suyanto. (2013). Dampak UU informasi
dan transaksi elektronik (UU ITE) terhadap
perubahan hukum dan sosial dalam
masyarakat. Jakarta: Universitas
Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya. http://ejournal.
jurwidyakop3.
com/index.php/jurnal-ilmiah/article/view/99
. Akses: 15-12-2014.
Susanto, Eko Hari, (2011). Media baru,
kebebasan informasi dan demokrasi di
kalangan generasi muda. Jakarta:
Universitas Tarumanagara.
http://journal.tarumanagara.ac.id/index.php/
kidFik/article/view/1246 . Akses: 15-12-
Tiwari, Shishir & Ghosh, Gitanjali. (2013).
Social media and freedom of speech and
expression: challenges before the Indian
law. India: North-Eastern Hill University.
https://www. academia.edu/4117408/.
Akses: 8-1-2015.
Wibowo, Ari. (2012). Kebijakan delik
pencemaran nama baik di Indonesia.
Pandecta vol.7, no. 7. Yogyakarta: UII.
http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pand
ecta/article/view/2358 . Akses: 15-12-2014.
Yonatha, Nadya S. (2012). Kebijakan kriminal
dalam penanggulagan tindak pidana
pencemaran nama baik yang terjadi di media
jejaring sosial. Palembang: Universitas IBA.
http://repository.iba.ac.id/index.php?p=show
_detail&id=555 . Akses: 15-12-2014.
Undang Undang RI No.11 Tahun 2008 tentang
Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang Undang RI No.40 Tahun 1999 tentang
Pers.
www.fimela.com/news-entertainment/ tentanguu-
ite-dan-kebebasan-berpendapat-di-mataahli-
hukum. Akses: 24-10-2014.
Authors whose manuscript is published will approve the following provisions:
The right to publication of all journal material published on the jurnal representamen website is held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain the property of the author).
The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, which means Jurnal Representamen reserves the right to store, modify the format, administer in database, maintain and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
Printed and electronic published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.