Budaya Transaksional dalam Kelas Menengah, Diametral Pilihan antara Idealisme dan Pragmatisme (dalam Perspektif Sociological Imagination C.Wright Milss)

Authors

  • Arie Wahyu Prananta Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Zainal Abidin Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/representamen.v6i02.4267

Abstract

Abstract

 

This article is to understand, analyze and interpret the movement diametrically space between idealism and pragmatism transaksionalisme cultural anti middle class groups conducted by using sociological perspectives Imagination C. Wright Mills. This article tries to find that the room is diametrically between idealism and pragmatism that appeared in diametraletis middle class anti-culture transaksionalisme get that high integrity to break away from the role of private and public roles, venue selection in anti culture transaksionalisme so they choose a place that can accommodate their anti-mainstream and dare to get out of your comfort zone, to change the system, although the risk will become a person who alienated, unpopular and always in solitude space. Diametric between idealism and pragmatism and for groups in the area of anti-culture transaksionalisme lighter because dilemma ethical in the role of his own, while a group in the area of power and politics is heavier because some can only see and experience the shock remarkable to stress but do not have the power to report it, some others even splashed in the cultural world transaksionalisme.

 

Keywords: Idealism, Pragmatism, diametraletis, sociological imagination

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amsyah, Z. (2003). Manajemen Kearsipan. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Azmi. (2016). Signifikansi Empat Instrumen Pokok Pengelolaan Arsip Dinamis. ANRI Jurnal Kearsipan, 11, 15–38.

Dinas Perhubungan Surabaya. (2020). Profil Dinas Perhubungan Kota Surabaya. Surabaya: Dinas Perhubungan.

Fajri, H., & Syahyuman. (2012). Sistem Pengelolaan arsip Dinamis Aktif di Kantor Perpustakaan, Arsip, dan Dokumentasi Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. Jurnal Ilmu Informasi Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan, 1(1).

Husni, E., & Hirma, D. (2019). Pengelolaan Arsip Dalam Mendukung Tertib Administrasi Di Universitas Dharma Andalas Padang. Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis Dharma Andalas, 21(1), 20–30.

Meirinawati, & Prabawati, I. (2015). Manajemen Kearsipan untuk Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Administrasi Perkantoran yang Efektif dan Efisien. 177–187.

Mulyadi. (2018). Efektivitas Sistem Kearsipan Dinamis ( SIKD ) Sebagai Sarana Temu Kembali Arsip Di Dinas Arsip, Perpustakaan Dan Dokumentasi (ARPUSDOK) Kota Palembang. Jipi, 3(1), 50–73.

Nurtanzila, L., & Nurpita, A. (2018). Penggunaan Arsip Untuk Kegiatan Administrasi: Tinjauan di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Kearsipan, 13(2), 107–119.

Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Kearsipan. Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Kearsiapan.

Putranto, W. A. (2018). Pengelolaan Arsip Di Era Digital:Mempertimbangkan Kembali Sudut Pandang Pengguna. Diplomatika: Jurnal Kearsipan Terapan, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/diplomatika.28253

Saeroji, A. (2014). Inovasi Media Pembelajaran Kearsipan Electronik Arsip (E-Arsip) Berbasis Microsoft Office Access. Dinamika Pendidikan, 9(2), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v9i2.4893

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kearsipan. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kearsipan.

Wijaya, R. A., Wiyono, B. B., & Bafadal, I. (2018). Pengelolaan Kearsipan. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.17977/um027v1i22018p231

Yuniasih, & Irawan, B. (2018). Analisis Manajemen Kearsipan di Kantor Kecamatan Jagakarsa Kota Administrasi Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani, 5(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2457491

Stachowicz-Stanusch, Agata. 2013. “Relationship Between National Intellectual Capital and Corruption: Cross National Studies.”

Suseno, F M. 1997. “13 Tokoh Etika Sejak Jaman Yunani Sampai Abad Ke 19, Yogyakarta: Kanisius,.”

Talshier, G. 2005. “Intellectual as a Political Actor? Four Models of Theory / Praxis.” Wiratmo, S. 1986. “Cendekiawan Dan Politik Penerbit LP3ES, Jakarta.”

Wright Mills, C. 2013. The Sociological Imagination, Contemporary Perspective. Contempora. ed. Ann Nilsen Scoot John. United Kingdom.

———. 2014. “C. Wright Mills, the Power and Power of the Elite - a Reassessment.”

Downloads

Published

2020-10-27