Konflik Supporter Jakmania Dan Maung Bandung Ditinjau Dari Komunikasi Lintas Budaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/representamen.v6i01.3517Abstract
The incident between supporters of Jakmania and Maung Bandung which led to an endless conflict and various efforts have been tried to minimize the feud between supporters of this football club. Observing cross-cultural communication, differences in the background of values, artifacts, and language are often sources of conflict and this has happened to both Jakmania and Maung supporters in Bandung. Jakmania and Maung Bandung conflict management can be approached including encouraging collaborative relations and mutual respect, empowering individuals, groups, and communities to find positive resources for humane and constructive change, generating and using positive resources for the good of the overall system, building community awareness and systemic on the part of the participants, helping the group to jointly build a positive future. The conflict resolution approach is carried out within the framework of alternative solutions to the resolution of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and the style of handling conflicts to accommodate / give, divert attention from conflict, compromise / give and take, collaboration / work together to find solutions for Jakmania and Maung Bandung.
Keywords: Cross Cultural Communication, Conflict, Conflict Management
Downloads
References
Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Amiri, M., Farhoodi, F., Abdolvand, N., & Bidakhavidi, A. R. (2011). A study of the relationship between big-five personality traits and communication styles with marital satisfaction of married students majoring in public universities of tehran. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 685–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.132
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical issues ini structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Reearch, 16(1), 78–117.
Birditt, K. S., Brown, E., Orbuch, T. L., & McIlvane, J. M. (2010). Marital conflict behaviors and implications for divorce over 16 years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1188–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00758.x
Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communications Monographs, 59(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376268
Carroll, S. J., Hill, E. J., Yorgason, J. B., Larson, J. H., & Sandberg, J. G. (2013). Couple communication as a mediator between work-family conflict and marital satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9237-7
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7).
Dailey, R. M., Hampel, A. D., & Roberts, J. B. (2010). Relational maintenance in on-again/off-again relationships: an assessment of how relational maintenance, uncertainty, and commitment vary by relationship type and status. Communication Monographs, 77(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903514292
Dainton, M. (2008). The use of relationship maintenance behaviors as a mechanism to explain the decline in marital satisfaction among parents the use of relationship maintenance behaviors as a mechanism to explain the decline in marital satisfaction among parents. Communication Quarterly, 21(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210802019413
Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine Maintenance Behaviors: A Comparison of Relationship Type, Partner Similarity and Sex Differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000206
Dew, J., & Wilcox, W. B. (2013). Generosity and the maintenance of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(5), 1218–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12066
Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540000
Fatimah, S. (2018). Hubungan cinta komitmen dengan kepuasan pernikahan dimoderatori oleh kebersyukuran. Psikodimensia, 17(1), 26–35.
Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1993). ENRICH marital satisfaction scale: A brief research and clinical tool. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(2), 176–185.
Frisby, B. N., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2012). The “how” and “why” of flirtatious communication between marital partners. Communication Quarterly, 60(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.704568
Haas, S. M., & Stafford, L. (2005). Maintenance behaviors in same-sex and marital maintenance relationships: A matched sample comparison. The Journal of Family Communication, 5(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0501
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
Horn, E. E., Xu, Y., Beam, C. R., Turkheimer, E., & Emery, R. E. (2013). Accounting for the physical and mental health benefits of entry into marriage: A genetically informed study of selection and causation. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029803
Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Marital biography and health at mid-life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000307
Jackson-Dwyer, D. (2014). Interpersonal Relationships. In Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-6631.1968.tb01978.x
Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues, Ninth Edition (9th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Kline, P. (1986). A Handbook of Test Construction (Routledge, ed.). New York: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Knoke, J., Burau, J., & Roehrle, B. (2010). Attachment styles, loneliness, quality, and stability of marital relationships. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 51(5), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502551003652017
Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2016). Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication? Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12301
Maier, M., Turkiewicz, K., & Herrman, A. R. (2019). Relational maintenance strategies and satisfaction in the stepmother–stepdaughter dyad. Family Journal, 27(4), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480719852368
McEwan, B., Sumner, E., Eden, J., & Fletcher, J. (2017). The effects of facebook relational maintenance on friendship quality: an investigation of the facebook relational maintenance measure. Communication Research Reports, 35(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1361393
Ogolsky, B. G. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115.
Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512463338
Quek, K. M. T., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2013). Cultural values, self-disclosure, and conflict tactics as predictors of marital satisfaction among singaporean husbands and wives. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 21(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480712466822
Ragsdale, J. D. (1996). Gender, satisfaction level, and the use of relational maintenance strategies in marriage. Communication Monographs, 63(4), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376399
Sanjaya, A., Irwansyah, & Alunaza, H. (2017). Pemeliharaan hubungan dan komunikasi organisasi via media siber. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 14(2), 239–258.
Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 278–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510378125
Stafford, L. (2016). Marital sanctity, relationship maintenance, and marital quality. Journal of Family Issues, 37(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13515884
Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005
Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67(3), 306–323.
Waite, L. J., Luo, Y., & Lewin, A. C. (2009). Marital happiness and marital stability: Consequences for psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 38(1), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.07.001
Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (1999). Using paired data to tet models of relational maintenance and marital quality. Jouraal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599162003
Whisman, M. A., Gilmour, A. L., & Salinger, J. M. (2018). Marital satisfaction and moratlity in the United States adult population. Health Psychology, 37(11), 1041–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000677
Widhiarso, W. (2009). Koefisien reliabilitas pada pengukuran kepribadian yang bersifat multidimensi. Psikobuana, 1(1), 39–48.
Wulandari, O. (2016). Pemeliharaan hubungan antara orangtua yang bercerai dan anak (studi kualitatif deskriptif komunikasi antar pribadi antara orangtua yang memiliki hak asuh dengan anaknya). Komuniti: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Teknologi Informasi, 8(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v8i1.2928
Yum, Y. (2003). The relationships among loneliness, self/partner constructive maintenance behavior, and relational satisfaction in two cultures. Communication Studie, 54(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970309363303
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors whose manuscript is published will approve the following provisions:
The right to publication of all journal material published on the jurnal representamen website is held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain the property of the author).
The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, which means Jurnal Representamen reserves the right to store, modify the format, administer in database, maintain and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
Printed and electronic published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
