Analisis Perbandingan Biaya dan Waktu Pelaksanaan Pelat Lantai Beton Panel dan Beton Konvensional (Studi Kasus Proyek Pembangunan SMP Islam Terpadu AL-Irsyad Al-Islamiyah Kabupaten Pamekasan)

  • Bakti Dwi Prasetyo
  • Budi Witjaksana
  • Priyoto Priyoto
Keywords: Quality, Multiple linear regression, Ranking, SPSS

Abstract

The implementation of projects in Trenggalek Regency often does not achieve good construction quality and even construction failures are caused by underestimate bids or bids far below 80% of the HPS (self-estimated price) value set by the Commitment Making Officer (PPKom) or the Budget User Authority (KPA). The use of costs that are too low far below 80% of the HPS has been determined can result in deviations in the quality of construction projects, so that it can harm the Trenggalek Regency government. The ranking method is used to determine the ranking of respondents which can later be used as a reference for why the construction of campus buildings is delayed, Data analysis in this study uses multiple linear regression analysis stepwise method based on the results of the analysis of variable X6 (environment) and X1 (tender document review) is the most dominant factor in the quality of project quality in Trenggalek district with multiple linear regression equation Y = 0, 043 + 0.948 (X6) + 0.251 (X1) and the results of the β coefficient value, obtained the following ranking of the Project Location / Environment Factor (X6) with a β coefficient value of 1.097, auction document review factor (X1) with a β coefficient value of 0.251, cost factor (X4) with a β coefficient value of 0.187, work method factor (X3) with a β coefficient value of -0.042, planning factor (X5) with a β coefficient value of -0.212, Schedule / Implementation Time Factor (X2) with a β coefficient value of -0.432, Work environment factor (X2) with a β coefficient value of -0.063.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung Nugroho, B. Startegi Jitu Memilih Metode Statistik Penelitian dengan SPSS, CV. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta. 2005
pekerjaan proyek konstruksi di Kabupaten Tambanan. Jurnal Ilmiah Elektronik.ojs.unud.ac.id
Azwar, Saifudin. 1997. Reliabilitas dan Validitas, Yogyakarta. Pustaka Belajar
Barie, D.S., Paulson, Jr. B.C. dan Sudinarto. 1995. Manajemen Konstruksi Profesional. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta.
Dipohusodo, Istimawan.1996. Manajemen Proyek dan Konstruksi, jilid 2. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta
Djojosoedarso, Soeisno. 1999. Prinsip Prinsip Manajemen Resiko dan Asuransi. Salemba Empat. Jakarta
F, F. (2005). Identifikasi penyebab overrun biaya proyek konstruksi gedung. SMARTek, 3(3), 160–168.
Fahadila F Remi. (2017). Kajian Faktor Penyebab Cost Overrun pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung, Jurnal Teknik Mesin Mercu Buana
Henry Wattimury, Deane RO, (2015). Identifikasi faktor-faktor cost overrun biaya overhead pada proyek pembangunan manado town square III. Jurnal Sipil Statik. ejournal.unsrat.ac.id
Ismail I. 2013. Keterlambatan Proyek Konstruksi Gedung Faktor Penyebab Dan Tindakan Pencegahannya. jurnal momentum. e-journal.itp.ac.id
Kurniawan F, 2015. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil. Universitas Narotama. Surabaya. ISBN : 978-602-72437-1-2.
Mutiawati C, 2012. Penyebab Cost Overrun pada proyek konstruksi. jurnal teknik sipil. jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id
Norken IN, AIN Yuda. 2012. Manajemen risiko pada proyek konstruksi di Pemerintah kabupaten jembrana. jurnal ilmiah teknik sipil.
Nurlela, Hery Suprapto. 2014. Identifikasi Dan Analisis Manajemen Risiko Pada Proyek Pembangunan Infrastruktur Bangunan Gedung Bertingkat. E-Journal Universitas Gunadarma
Santoso, Singgih. SPSS Statistik Multivariat. Jakarta. Gramedia. 2010
Septarini, D. F., Lia, E., Kore, R., Ekonomi, F., & Musamus, U. (2016). 1) , 2), (1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps/62.010302
Published
2024-03-18
Section
Articles