PARADIGMA PRINSIP HARDSHIP DALAM HUKUM PERJANJIAN PASCA ERA NEW NORMAL DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v4i1.4441Keywords:
hardship, force majeure, perjanjianAbstract
Abstract
This journal aims to analyze and discuss about the issuance by government policies related to the Covid-19 pandemic such as Large-Scale Social Restrictions and Social Distancing, which is greatly affecting the performance to implement achievements in the contract, so that some parties can make excuse that there is a force majeure event so the party can terminate the contract. With this situation, it is certainly very important for both party to know and understand the principles of hardship. This research method is normative research which is used to examine the problems that exist in this research. The results of the study found that the rules regarding hardship itself have developed in the practice of international contract law which is regulated in the UNIDROIT Principle of International Commercial Contracts (UPICC) that can be used as a reference in making agreements that have high value and long term. The acknowledgment of its absence of hardship ownin the legal system in Indonesia has made the settlement of cases that related in the hardship category will be settled with the applicable provisions, such as good faith and force majeure. Therefore, contract law in Indonesia is expected to be more adaptive and flexible in relation to changing og circumstances fundamentally by the application of the principle hardship to the legal system in Indonesia.
Keywords: contract; force majeure; hardship
Abstrak
Jurnal ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mendiskusikan mengenai terbitnya kebijakan pemerintah terkait pandemi Covid-19 seperti Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar dan Social Distancing, yang tentu saja sangat mempengaruhi kewajiban pelaksanaan prestasi dalam perjanjian, sehingga beberapa pihak dapat beralasan terdapat nya keadaan memaksa sehingga pihak tersebut dapat mengakihiri perjanjian. Dengan adanya keadaan tersebut tentu sangatlah penting bagi para pihak agar dapat mengerti dan memahami mengenai prinsip hardship. Metode penelitian ini bersifat normatif yang digunakan untuk mengkaji problematika yang ada di dalam peneltian ini. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa aturan mengenai hardship sendiri sudah berkembang di dalam praktik hukum kontrak internasional yang diatur di dalam UNIDROIT Principle of International Commercial Contracts (UPICC) yang dapat dijadikan rujukan dalam melakukan perjanjian-perjanjian yang memiliki nilai yang tinggi serta jangka waktu yang panjang. Belum diakui nya hardship sendiri di dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia membuat penyelesaian perkara yang termasuk kategori hardship diselesaikan dengan ketentuan-ketentuan yang berlaku yaitu itikad baik dan force majeure. Maka dari itu hukum perjanjian di Indonesia diharapkan dapat lebih adaftif serta fleksibel terkait dengan perubahan keadaan secara fundamental dengan diterapkannya prinsip hardship ke dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Allen, N. & Meyer, J. 1990. Measurement of Antecendents of Affective,Continuance and Normative commitment to Organizational. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-8.
Bassman, E. (1992). Abuse in the Workplace: Management Remedies and Bottom Line Impact. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum.
Cooper, C. dan Robertson, I. (2001). Well-being in organizations. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Dumitru, A., Burtaverde, V., & Mihaila, T. (2015). Exploring turnover, bullying at work and organizational commitment in the communication field. Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology, 6(4).
Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & stress, 23(1), 24-44.
Elangovan, A. R. (2001). Causal ordering of stress, satisfaction and commitment, and intention to quit: a structural equations analysis. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
Fapohunda, T. M. (2013). Towards effective team building in the workplace. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(4), 1-12.
Firth, L., Mellor, D. J., Moore, K. A., & Loquet, C. (2004). How can managers reduce employee intention to quit?. Journal of managerial psychology.
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2014). PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES konsep, metode dan Aplikasi menggunakan program WarpPLS 4.0. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hamid, S. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Lanjutan. Deepublish.
Mathis, R. L. dan Jackson,(2011). Human Resource Management. Cengage Learnin. USA
Mattice& Garman,(2011). Building a culture of respect: Managing bullying at work (pp. 135–154). London:Taylor & Francis.
McCarthy, P, Mayhew, C., Barker, M., and Sheehan, M. 2003 Bullying and Occupational Violence in tertiary education: Risk factors, perpetrators and prevention, Journal of Occupational Health and Safety Australia and New Zealand, 19, 4, pp.319-26
Mitchell, T., dkk. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 4 (6).
Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2008, June). The construction and validation of the Short-Negative Acts Questionnaire. In Comunicación en el 6th International Conference on Workplace Bullying (pp. 4-6).
Oghojafor, B. A., & Adebakin, M. A. (2012). Assessment of job design and job satisfaction among doctors and nurses in Lagos, Nigeria hospitals. African Journal of Business Management, 6(48), 11702.
Putra, D.K., dan Pujiastuti, I.S.S. (2015). Pengaruh Workplace Bullying Pada Kepuasan Kerja, Komitmen Organisasi, Dan Niat Untuk Berpindah Dengan Strain Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Fokus Manajerial, 13(2): 177-188.
Randi L. Sims, Peng Sun, (2012) "Witnessing work place bullying and the Chinese manufacturing emplo-yee", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 27 Iss: 1, pp.9 – 26.
Sanjaya, I. K. E., & Indrawati, A. D. (2014). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Kompensasi, dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Pande Agung Segara Dewata. E-Jurnal Manajemen, 3(1).
Winarni, Luh Nila. “ASAS ITIKAD BAIK SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN KON-SUMEN DALAM PERJANJIAN PEMBIAYAAN.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (2015).
Yusmita, Yusmita, Riski Pebru Ariyanti, Enricho Duo Putra Njoto, and Rizal Yudistira. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR DAN KREDITUR DALAM MELAKUKAN PERJANJIAN BAKU.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (2019).
“KAJIAN HUKUM KEADAAN MEMAKSA (FORCE MAJEURE) MENURUT PASAL 1244 DAN PASAL 1245 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA.” LEX PRI-VATUM (2016).
“Keberadaan Asas Rebus Sic Stantibus Dalam Perjanjian Internasional.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada (2011).
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
